Could The Ultra-Metal-Poor Stars Be Chemically Peculiar And Not Related To The First Stars?

Date

2008-04

Authors

Venn, Kim A.
Lambert, David L.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Chemically peculiar stars define a class of stars that show unusual elemental abundances due to stellar photospheric effects and not due to natal variations. In this paper, we compare the elemental abundance patterns of the ultra-metal-poor stars with metallicities [Fe/H]similar to-5 to those of a subclass of chemically peculiar stars. These include post-AGB stars, RV Tauri variable stars, and the Lambda Bootis stars, which range in mass, age, binarity, and evolutionary status, yet can have iron abundance determinations as low as [Fe/H]similar to-5. These chemical peculiarities are interpreted as due to the separation of gas and dust beyond the stellar surface, followed by the accretion of dust-depleted gas. Contrary to this, the elemental abundances in the ultra-metal-poor stars are thought to represent yields of the most metal-poor supernovae and, therefore, observationally constrain the earliest stages of chemical evolution in the universe. Detailed chemical abundances are now available for HE 1327-2326 and HE 0107-5240, the two extreme ultra-metal-poor stars in our Galaxy, and for HE 0557-4840, another ultra-metal-poor star found by the Hamburg/ESO survey. There are interesting similarities in their abundance ratios to those of the chemically peculiar stars; e. g., the abundances of the elements in their photospheres are related to the condensation temperature of that element. If these three stars are chemically peculiar, then their CNO abundances suggest true metallicities of [X/H] similar to-2 to -4. It is important to establish the nature of these stars, since they are used as tests of the early chemical evolution of the Galaxy.

Description

LCSH Subject Headings

Citation

Venn, K. A., and David L. Lambert. "Could the Ultra-Metal-poor Stars be Chemically Peculiar and Not Related to the First Stars?." The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 677, No. 1 (Apr., 2008): 572.