Texas National Security Review

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/63836

The Texas National Security Review is a new kind of journal committed to excellence, scholarly rigor, and big ideas.

Launched in 2017 by War on the Rocks and the University of Texas (as a part of its Texas National Security Network) we aim for articles published in this journal to end up on university syllabi and the desks of decision-makers, and to be cited as the foundational research and analysis on world affairs.

Why do we need another journal?

Many scholars and policymakers have worked on the challenges of bridging the gap between academia and the world of practice and policy. These conferences, fellowship programs, workshops, articles, and books have been important in solving this problem set.

We are still limited, however, by the traditional shape and form of the pillars of the academic profession. One of these is the scholarly journal. Lengthy review periods, jargon-laden prose, particularism, stodgy and large publishing houses, and “gates” that limit dissemination are well-known problems. On top of these, a lack of true interdisciplinary writing and review continue to limit the ability of most journals to serve as vehicles for policy engagement while continuing to facilitate scholarly communication and advancement.

War on the Rocks has partnered with the Texas National Security Network – a flagship effort by Chancellor William McRaven of the University of Texas System – to solve these problems. The Texas National Security Review sits at the heart of this new partnership. It features scholarly articles as well as essays by policymakers and practitioners. Its academic articles are:

  • Peer reviewed (double-blind);
  • Rigorous and demonstrate academic excellence;
  • Interdisciplinary; and
  • Accessible and useful for decision-makers and practitioners.

By focusing on the production and publication of top-tier scholarly work that serves both academic and “real-world” audiences and goals, we aim to create something we know is difficult but we believe is well worth pursuing. The print edition comes out quarterly and will be made available online, for free, for everyone. The online edition also features roundtable-style debates, discussions, and book reviews.

The Texas National Security Review maintains the best practices of scholarly journals – namely double-blind peer review enabled by a strong editorial board and stable of reviewers – while otherwise remaking how these publications are produced and disseminated. Even though we are going to be rigorous, exclusive, and methodologically pluralistic, we are going to demand jargon-free prose and scholarly work that addresses current policy problems. The result will be articles that are reviewed and edited quickly (see our Submissions page) and upon publication will experience meaningful exposure and access to decision-makers outside the ivory tower.

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 20 of 226
  • Item
    Vol. 7, Iss. 3: The Cost of Power (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Texas National Security Review
  • Item
    Why We Write (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Gavin, Francis J.
  • Item
    Estimating China’s Defense Spending: How to Get It Wrong (and Right) (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Fravel, M. Taylor; Gilboy, George J.; Heginbotham, Eric
  • Item
    Access Denied? Non-Aligned State Decisions to Grant Access During War (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Ellinger, Emily
  • Item
    A Break in the Clouds: Learning Lessons From the Sea (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Hoffman, Frank G.; Garrett, George P.
  • Item
    Confronting Another Axis? History, Humility, and Wishful Thinking (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Zelikow, Philip
  • Item
    The Great Game and the Korean Question: A Dawn of the New Order (Summer 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Jin, Sangpil
  • Item
    Vol. 7, Iss. 2: Beneath the Surface (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Texas National Security Review
  • Item
    What Exactly Are We Doing? (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Gavin, Francis J.
    In his introduction to Volume 7, Issue 2, the chair of our editorial board, Frank Gavin, considers why the United States seems stuck in the Middle East and suggests that Washington refocus on core grand-strategic interests. More broadly, he calls on Americans to find ways to passionately and respectfully discuss difficult issues.
  • Item
    Climate Change and Military Power: Hunting for Submarines in the Warming Ocean (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Gilli, Andrea; Gilli, Mauro; Ricchi, Antonio; Russo, Aniello; Carniel, Sandro
    Climate change will have significant effects on military power, capabilities, effectiveness, and employment. Yet, scholars have paid little attention to this topic. We address this gap by investigating the effects of changing ocean conditions on anti-submarine warfare. Anti-submarine warfare capabilities exploit various physical phenomena to detect enemy submarines, principally underwater sound propagation. Underwater sound propagation depends on factors influenced by climate change, such as water temperature and salinity. Through ocean-acoustic simulations, we estimate the effect of climate change on the detection range of enemy submarines in the North Atlantic and in the Western Pacific. Our results show that, in most areas, the range of detection through underwater acoustics is contracting due to climate change.
  • Item
    Franklin D. Roosevelt, World War II, and the Reality of Constitutional Statesmanship (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Schumacher, Luke J.
    Is statesmanship compatible with constitutional government? Scholars have posited the possibility of “constitutional statesmanship” in America but have done little to probe its historical reality or to evaluate its consequences. To illustrate some of the limits, possibilities, and ambivalences of constitutional statesmanship in practice, this article examines Franklin Roosevelt’s leadership on the home front as the country contemplated and later waged war abroad. I argue that, while the president applied constitutional statesmanship to prepare his nation for war, this brand of circumscribed statesmanship later struggled to resolve the tensions between the demands of war and the dictates of constitutionalism. After explaining how distinct notions of constitutionalism generate unique expectations of statesmanship, I show how Roosevelt’s own conceptions of the U.S. Constitution and American statesmanship, developed before World War II, elucidate his leadership decisions during wartime. His leadership, for good or ill, indelibly shaped the powers of the U.S. president and the constitutional order we live under today.
  • Item
    From Panic to Policy: The Limits of Foreign Propaganda and the Foundations of an Effective Response (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Wilde, Gavin
    American leaders and scholars have long feared the prospect that hostile foreign powers could subvert democracy by spreading false, misleading, and inflammatory information by using various media. Drawing on both historical experience and empirical literature, this article argues that such fears may be both misplaced and misguided. The relationship between people’s attitudes and their media consumption remains murky, at best, despite technological advances promising to decode or manipulate it. This limitation extends to foreign foes as well. Policymakers therefore risk becoming pessimistic toward the public and distracted from the domestic, real-world drivers of their confidence in democratic institutions. Policy interventions may also prove detrimental to democratic values like free expression and to the norms that the United States aims to foster in the information environment.
  • Item
    Rethinking U.S. Africa Policy Amid Changing Geopolitical Realities (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Chin, John J.; Bartos, Haleigh
    Since 2020, Africa has seen more political unrest, violent extremism, and democratic reversals than any other region in the world. A wave of coups has washed across the Sahel and West Africa, leaving authoritarians in power in numerous countries. In addition, the continent has served as a stage for the escalating great-power competition between China, Russia, and the United States. U.S. engagement with Africa has long been deprioritized in Washington, with successive administrations devoting scant attention and resources to advancing democracy and resolving conflicts. Thus far, the Biden administration has maintained this pattern, which reflects the persistent tension between an interests-based and values-based U.S. foreign policy. Nevertheless, there are a few actions the United States can take to reinvigorate democracy and stabilize the region, such as emphasizing development and diplomacy over military responses and stepping up cooperation with allies and partners to reduce the influence of China and Russia.
  • Item
    Stabilizing Haiti: A Guide for Policymakers (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Murray, Ian; Bernotavicius, Chris
    Proposals for a security-focused intervention in Haiti are logical given the rampant instability and endless escalation of gang violence. Many argue that Haiti’s foundational problems of economic underdevelopment, violence, and weak institutions cannot be addressed without improvements in basic security. Previous interventions — always on scales far larger than the currently proposed U.N.-approved mission — have not served Haitian civil society. Instead they have shored up corrupt regimes, and it is far from clear that they have contributed to any stability in Haiti. The country’s challenges are fatalistically ascribed to violence, and the narrative that nothing can be done to improve Haiti’s economic and social conditions until security improves both belies the origin of Haiti’s economic challenges and precludes discussion of economic engagement. Haiti is in chaos, and events are moving quickly. This heightens the need to consider both immediate and longer-term policy responses rather than another security intervention that will repeat the mistakes of the past.
  • Item
    The Futility of Great-Power Politics (Spring 2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Hobson, Alex
    In this roundtable feature, Alex Hobson reviews Galen Jackson’s book, “A Lost Peace,” and considers lessons that its historical analysis offers for the current crisis in the Middle East. Hobson’s essay is part of a roundtable review published on TNSR’s website in March.
  • Item
    Vol. 7, Iss. 1: Audacity and Alliances (Winter 2023/2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Texas National Security Review
  • Item
    Cracks in the Ivory Tower? (Winter 2023/2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Gavin, Francis J.
  • Item
    Making Peace From the Outside-in or the Inside-out (Winter 2023/2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Stein, Janice Gross
  • Item
    Alliance Commitment in an Era of Partisan Polarization: A Survey Experiment of U.S. Voters (Winter 2023/2024)
    (Texas National Security Review, 2024) Bäcker-Peral, Verónica; Park, Gene