Eisenhower's shield : building foreign militaries, retrenchment, and the New Look

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorSuri, Jeremi
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWeaver, Catherine
dc.contributor.committeeMemberInboden, William
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLawrence, Mark
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRedei, Lorinc
dc.creatorDouglas, Eleanore Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-19T21:18:37Z
dc.date.available2021-07-19T21:18:37Z
dc.date.created2018-08
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.date.submittedAugust 2018
dc.date.updated2021-07-19T21:18:38Z
dc.description.abstractAt the outset of the 21st century, United States foreign policy experienced a spasm of strategic over-extension under the administration of George W. Bush, followed by a period of more or less directed retrenchment under Barack Obama, yet America’s long-standing practice of building foreign military capabilities continued largely unchanged under both. The role played by building foreign militaries during more expansive periods of foreign policy “engagement” or “renewal” is not controversial; the role played under a strategy of retrenchment is neither theoretically obvious, nor well-understood. This dissertation seeks to clarify the role played by building foreign militaries under a strategy of retrenchment through the historical examination of a prominent example in modern US history: that of Eisenhower’s New Look. My research suggests Eisenhower viewed the practice of building foreign militaries as a crucial and constructive policy instrument to accomplishing the objectives of the New Look. Through a detailed examination of the two largest and most significant cases of that era, South Korea and NATO, I find that these programs made positive and important material contributions to the overarching goals of retrenchment in a number of ways: in facilitating the pursuit and conclusion of durable diplomatic agreements, in establishing or enhancing local or regional military capabilities as a vital precondition for potential US redeployment, and finally as a crucial lubricant to sustained burden-sharing in continuing to meet longer-term US national interests. Yet building foreign militaries was not in itself sufficient to realize the conditions of durable political order in recipient nations or regions that would make a complete withdrawal of US forces possible. At the same time, American efforts to rebalance its own resources and global commitments sometimes led to the creation of serious military imbalances in developing partners and allies with potentially destabilizing effects. Finally, the rhetorical promise of building foreign militaries almost always exceeded what was realized within a politically salient timeframe, setting the stage for persistent public perceptions of failure.
dc.description.departmentPublic Policy
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/86870
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/13821
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectEisenhower
dc.subjectBuilding partner capacity
dc.subjectRetrenchment
dc.subjectNATO
dc.subjectSouth Korea
dc.subjectMutual Security Program
dc.titleEisenhower's shield : building foreign militaries, retrenchment, and the New Look
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentPublic Policy
thesis.degree.disciplinePublic policy (PhD)
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DOUGLAS-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf
Size:
2.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
4.46 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations