Fostering psychological safety through facework: the importance of the effective delivery of performance feedback

dc.contributor.advisorDaly, John A. (John Augustine), 1952-en
dc.creatorSmith, Mary Eileenen
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-28T23:18:59Zen
dc.date.available2008-08-28T23:18:59Zen
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the relationships between employees’ perceptions of supervisory coaching-oriented behaviors and psychological safety at work, and between psychological safety at work and error reporting and turnover. This study also examined the relationships between employees’ perceptions of the degree to which supervisors show regard for their subordinates’ positive and negative face under conditions of negative feedback communication, and psychological safety at work. Coaching-oriented behaviors were operationalized as delivering prompt, specific, and behaviorally-related general performance feedback; considerate, private, and externally-attributed negative performance feedback; public and internally-attributed positive performance feedback; seeking input from work group members; listening to work group members’ concerns; and being accessible and receptive to work group members’ questions and ideas. Results indicated that the more supervisors were perceived to (a) seek input from subordinate employees regarding work-related matters, (b) attribute poor performance to external factors when delivering negative performance feedback, and (c) provide prompt general performance feedback to employees, the greater employees’ reported psychological safety. Results also indicated that the more supervisors were perceived to attend to employees’ face needs when delivering negative feedback (particularly their positive face needs), the greater employees’ reported psychological safety. In turn, psychological safety was found to be significantly and positively associated with the willingness of employees (and work groups) to report errors, and to be significantly and negatively associated with employees’ (and work groups’) intention to turnover. Negative feedback delivered in a considerate tone of voice also was found to be a statistically significant predictor of group members’ willingness to report errors. However, psychological safety was not found to be related to actual error reporting or turnover by work unit in this study. Implications and directions for further research are discussed.
dc.description.departmentCommunication Studiesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.identifierb68655228en
dc.identifier.oclc166290508en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/2964en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en
dc.subject.lcshPsychology, Industrial--Texas--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshEmployees--Rating of--Texas--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshEmployees--Coaching of--Texas--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshFeedback (Psychology)--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshEmployee retention--Texas--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshSupervision of employees--Texas--Case studiesen
dc.titleFostering psychological safety through facework: the importance of the effective delivery of performance feedbacken
dc.type.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentCommunication Studiesen
thesis.degree.disciplineCommunication Studiesen
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
smithm02908.pdf
Size:
2.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.65 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: