Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCherwitz, Richard A., 1952-
dc.creatorMangis, Daniel Edwarden
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T17:53:30Zen
dc.date.available2015-04-28T17:53:30Zen
dc.date.issued2005-12en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/29637en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation provides a theoretically grounded framework for investigating "legal rhetoric." By making a distinction between the discursive elements of a Legal system and the broader rhetorical notion of Law, rhetorical critics can better understand the interdependent relationship between citizens, their legal structures, and their cultures. The Legal system represents the forum in which legal disputes are addressed. In contrast, the Law signifies the principles of justice and fairness that give rise to legal disputes addressed by the Legal system. This dissertation emphasizes the important role that media play in disseminating information about specific legal disputes and providing citizens an opportunity to reflect on which principles of justice and fairness are to be valued. This study specifically examines the text, reasoning, and media coverage of Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger, two U.S. Supreme Court cases related to the University of Michigan's use of racial classifications in its admissions process. By comparing which arguments and rhetorical elements from the Supreme Court's 2003 decisions were reported in the press, this dissertation both demonstrates the rhetorical concepts of the "Law" and the "Legal System" and suggests how citizens and rhetorical scholars can more fully critique legal texts.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en
dc.subjectLegal rhetoricen
dc.subjectMedia coverageen
dc.subjectJudicial argumentsen
dc.subjectU.S. Supreme Courten
dc.subjectLegal system vs. lawen
dc.subjectGratz v. Bollingeren
dc.subjectGrutter v. Bollingeren
dc.subjectUniversity of Michiganen
dc.subjectAffirmative actionen
dc.titleDistinguishing between the Law and the Legal : a rhetorical analysis of judicial argument and media coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court's deliberations in the University of Michigan affirmative action casesen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.departmentCommunication Studiesen
thesis.degree.departmentCommunication Studiesen
thesis.degree.disciplineCommunication Studiesen
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record