TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effective porosity estimation from 3D seismic reflection data : Marco Polo Field, Gulf of Mexico

    View/Open
    Access restricted to UT Austin EID holders (22.17Mb)
    Date
    2007-05
    Author
    Young, Gregory Russell
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Seismic inversion is a geophysical tool that uses geologically constrained physical models to infer elastic interval properties (e.g., P-velocity, S-velocity, and density) from seismic interface data (e.g., reflection amplitude and moveout). This thesis focuses on one such application to pre-stack seismic data from the Marco Polo Field, deepwater Gulf of Mexico. I compare the usefulness of post-, partial-, and pre-stack seismic inversion methods for estimating effective porosity by 1) inverting the Marco Polo Field seismic data with post-, partial-, and pre-stack seismic inversion methods, 2) transforming the estimated elastic parameters into effective porosity via fluid-dependent transformations derived from borehole data, and 3) interpreting all results in terms of inverse theory, rock physics, and the Marco Polo Field geology. I derive fluid-dependent transformations that are calibrated to the Marco Polo Field by cross-plotting measured elastic parameters (i.e., well logs) against petrophysical logs for gas-, oil-, and brine-saturated intervals in the wells. Cross-plot analysis indicates that density is best-suited for estimating effective porosity because the steep gradient of the density-to-effective porosity transformation implies minimal error magnification during mapping from the elastic parameter domain to the reservoir characteristic domain. The shallow gradient of the P-impedance-to-effective porosity transformation gradient results in substantial error magnification. Although density is the choice parameter for estimating effective porosity, deterministic linear seismic inversion methods have historically failed to resolve density. Post-stack inversion methods, which parameterize the model space with the single parameter P-impedance, provide no information about density. Partial-stack inversion methods fail to resolve density from angle-dependent amplitude variations because the NMO corrected gathers, upon which partial-stack inversions rely, have a separate null space that contains the necessary information to separate density from velocity within the impedance estimates. Pre-stack seismic inversion methods utilize the full waveform data (i.e., amplitude and moveout) and show great potential for estimating mass density. However, pre-stack seismic inversions are viewed as impractical due to high computation costs, and they are typically only applied to a few CMP's or over small time windows. Using the Miocene submarine fan system in the Marco Polo Field as a case study, I invert the 3D pre-stack seismic volume with a computationally efficient pre-stack seismic inversion algorithm, and I demonstrate that only full-waveform nonlinear pre-stack inversion accurately resolves density and estimates effective porosity within the deepwater system. The density and effective porosity estimates accurately tie with a type well with VSP, and they both correctly model the a priori structural and stratigraphic information in the Marco Polo Field. Moreover, the pre-stack inversion algorithm is able to resolve all model parameters from nearly flat initial models.
    Department
    Geological Sciences
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/2152/115232
    http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/42133
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin