Browsing by Subject "Profitability"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item The impact of cluster drilling technology on well productivity and profitability : a case study of the Fayetteville Shale play(2015-05) Hwang, Allen Thomas; Tinker, Scott W. (Scott Wheeler); Ikonnikova, SvetlanaHorizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in shale formations have led to a boom in the U.S. production of natural gas. After the commercial viability of the resource was proven, producers have been focused on innovative completion techniques to increase production and profit. While locations with high resource density and original gas in place can produce sufficient natural gas to make wells economical at relatively low prices, locations with low resource density appear non-viable. The objective of this study is to present an analysis of a new technology--cluster drilling--in the Fayetteville Shale development, highlighting the effect technology may have on well profitability. Inspired by the Fayetteville Shale-Production Outlook performed by the Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG) and funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, this study uses production history data, separating wells drilled as a cluster from analog non-cluster wells, to investigate changes in costs, production, and profitability. The study's well economics were analyzed with a discounted cash flow model that reflects how a change in a well production profile and drilling and completion costs will affect its profitability. The study uses individual well estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) projected using methods and well economics parameters reported by earlier studies of the play and investor presentations. The analysis produced several important results. First, on a per-well basis, non-cluster wells are, perhaps surprisingly, expected to recover more natural gas than cluster wells. Wells in the non-cluster drilling pattern outperform cluster wells in both productivity and profit. However, the well density of cluster drilling results in a higher recovery factor for a given volume of rock, thus a more thorough extraction of the resource. Second, while a cluster pattern produces more gas from a unit of volume, equating to a higher recovery factor, that production comes at higher cost. The analysis reveals the requisite reduction in drilling and completion costs for cluster wells to match profit levels of non-cluster wells in a given lease. Finally, the analysis suggests an operator may choose to forego monetary efficiency, measured by the present value index (PVI), for higher gas recovery factor provided by cluster drilling.Item The impact of delivery methods on the profitibility of commercial construction(2011-12) Herndon, Michael Brett; Nichols, Steven Parks, 1950-; McCann, Robert B.According to September 2011 information from the U.S. Census Bureau, the construction industry in the United States is valued at nearly eight hundred billion dollars annually. A 2004 collaborative study by Construction Industry Institute and Lean Construction Institute suggests that as much as fifty seven percent of time, effort, and material investment in construction projects do not add value to the final product. When compared with twenty six percent wastes in the manufacturing industry, it becomes obvious that the construction industry has a problem. Construction projects that come in over budget and behind schedule have become the rule rather than the exception, leading to contentious business relationships and costly litigation. This study will strive to identify and analyze the primary sources of these problems. Research and industry experience point to a lack of communication and cooperation among the various entities required to complete a construction project as the leading causes of waste in the industry. Further analysis suggests that traditional forms of construction contracts encourage adversarial and non-cooperative behavior between parties. Additionally, poor communication between various contributors opens the door for additional wasted cost. Fortunately, the development of tools such as Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) present new options to construction professionals that are proving to help address some of the challenges the industry faces today. IPD as a project delivery method creates a culture of collaboration and teamwork, where a culture of risk avoidance and conflict once stood, while BIM provides a platform for better communication among parties. When used together, these tools can reduce or eliminate many of the major sources of waste within the industry. This thesis will provide descriptions, analysis, and case studies that demonstrate the use of these tools and the potential they have to make a positive impact on the construction industry.