Jackson School of Geosciences
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/47260
Browse
Browsing Jackson School of Geosciences by Subject "9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, D.C."
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Comparing carbon sequestration in an oil reservoir to sequestration in a brine formation-field study(9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, D.C., 2008-11) Hovorka, Susan D.; Choi, Jong-Won; Meckel, Timothy A.; Treviño, Ramón H.; Hongliu, Zeng; Kordi, Masoumeh; Wang, Fred P.Geologic sequestration of CO2 in an oil reservoir is generally considered a different class than sequestration in formations which contain only brine. In this paper, the significance and validity of this conceptualization is examined by comparing the performance of CO2 injected into a depleted oil reservoir with the performance of similar injection into non-oil bearing sandstones using a field test at Cranfield Field, Mississippi as a case study. The differences considered are: (1)Residual oil in the reservoir slightly reduces the CO2 breakthrough time and rate of pressure build up as compared to a reservoir containing only brine, because under miscible conditions, more CO2 dissolves into oil than in to brine. (2)Dense wells provide improved assessment of the oil reservoir quality leading to improved prediction as well as verification of CO2 movement in this reservoir as compared to the sparsely characterized brine leg. The value of this information exceeds the risk of leakage. Assessment of the difference made by the presence of residual oil requires a good understanding reservoir properties to predict oil and gas distribution. Stratal slicing, attribute analysis and petrographic analyses are used to define the reservoir architecture. Real-time pressure response at a dedicated observation well and episodic pressure mapping has been conducted in the reservoir under flood since mid-2008; comparison measurements are planned for 2009 in down-dip environments lacking hydrocarbons. Model results using GEM compositional simulator compare well in general to measured reservoir response under CO2 flood; imperfections in model match of flood history document uncertainties Time laps RST logging is underway to validate fluid composition and migration models. Monitoring assessing the performance of the wells during the injection of CO2 suggests that the value of wells to provide field data for characterization exceeds the risk of leakage.Item Investigation of water displacement following large CO2 sequestration operations(9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, D.C., 2008-11) Nicot, Jean-Phillipe; Hovorka, Susan D.; Choi, Jong-WonThe scale of CO2 injection into the subsurface required to address CO2 atmospheric concentrations is unprecedented. Multiple injection sites injecting into multiple formations will create a large excess pressure zone extending far beyond the limited volume where CO2 is present. In a closed system, additional mass is accommodated by the compressibility of system components, an increase in fluid pressure, and possibly an uplift of the land surface. In an open system, as assumed in this analysis, another coping mechanism involves fluid flux out of the boundaries of the system, in which case the fresh-water-bearing outcrop areas, corresponding to the up-dip sections of the down-dip formations into which CO2 is injected, could be impacted. A preliminary study using a MODFLOW groundwater model extending far down-dip shows that injecting a large amount of fluid does have an impact some distance away from the injection area but most likely only in localized areas. A major assumption of this preliminary work was that multiphase processes do not matter some distance away from the injection zones. In a second step, presented in this paper, to demonstrate that a simplified model can yield results as useful as those of a more sophisticated multiphase-flow compositional model, we model the same system using CMG-GEM software. Because the chosen software lacks the ability to deal easily with unconfined water flow, we compare fluxes through time, as given by MODFLOW and CMG-GEM models at the confined/unconfined interface.Item Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces(9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, D.C., 2008-11) Nicot, Jean-Philippe; Oldenburg, Curtis M.; Bryant, Steven L.; Hovorka, Susan D.We investigate the possibility that brine could be displaced upward into potable water through wells. Because of the large volumes of CO2 to be injected, the influence of the zone of elevated pressure on potential conduits such as well boreholes could extend many kilometers from the injection site—farther than the CO2 plume itself. The traditional approach to address potential brine leakage related to fluid injection is to set an area of fixed radius around the injection well/zone and to examine wells and other potentially open pathways located in the “Area-of-Review” (AoR). This suggests that the AoR needs to be defined in terms of the potential for a given pressure perturbation to drive upward fluid flow in any given system rather than on some arbitrary pressure rise. We present an analysis that focuses on the changes in density/salinity of the fluids in the potentially leaking wellbore.Item Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces(9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, D.C., 2008-11) Nicot, Jean-Phillipe; Oldenburg, Curtis M.; Bryant, Steven L.; Hovorka, Susan D.We investigate the possibility that brine could be displaced upward into potable water through wells. Because of the large volumes of CO2 to be injected, the influence of the zone of elevated pressure on potential conduits such as well boreholes could extend many kilometers from the injection site—farther than the CO2 plume itself. The traditional approach to address potential brine leakage related to fluid injection is to set an area of fixed radius around the injection well/zone and to examine wells and other potentially open pathways located in the “Area-of-Review” (AoR). This suggests that the AoR needs to be defined in terms of the potential for a given pressure perturbation to drive upward fluid flow in any given system rather than on some arbitrary pressure rise. We present an analysis that focuses on the changes in density/salinity of the fluids in the potentially leaking wellbore.