47 Highpoint, North Hill, Highgate, LONDON, N6. 24 October 1950. Dear Professor Hrozny, Thank you very much for the offprint of the Journal of Juristic Papyrology, which is extremly interesting, both with regard to its publication of a new Pylos text, and to your own adventurous translation of it. As the very valuable function of your work is to promote discussion, perhaps I might make a comment on it from my own point of view ? The 15 lines of the inscription follow a rigid pattern: A AD-AC B C commodity numbers. Your proposal to read A, B, and C as the names of 3 divinities in each case, linked by "and" and in no syntactic relationship one the the other, comes up against 2 obstacles: - 1. AD-AC "field ?" is the second work in each sentence, which is not the simplest construction. 2. The occurences of A are grouped into paragraphs in a definite, if not entirely consistent, order; the groups B are different throughout the inscription; the groups C recur in a random way, one of them 4 times. None of the sign-groups occur outside their own positions. It seems a necessary conclusion that the positions of A, B and C in the sentences represent a functional distiction, which may or may not be reinforced by distinct case-endings. My own guess is that AD-AC represents a postposition "for??" governing A, and that C is an adjective or dependent noun quali- fying B. The structure of the inscription would be that a large number of persons (?) B, who share the 5 attributes C, join in a livestock (?) transaction for the benefit of a limited number of entities A. The sign-group which forms the second half of A in lines 1-4 I would guess to be a qualifying adjective or a noun preceded by the genitive. With best wishes. Dear Bennett, I got this article from Hrozny today and thought you might like to see it. Here also is a copy of my comments to him, which probably only state the obvious. I don't know whether you're back in the States at the moment, but if not it can await your arrival. I hope you had a pleasant and successful summer. Best wishes, Michael Ventris