TEXAS BUSINESS REVIEW A MONTHLY SUMMARY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN TEXAS BUREAU OF BUSINESS RESEARCH COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS VOL. XX, No. 4 May, 1946 HIGHLIGHTS OF TEXAS BUSINESS APRIL, 1946, COMPARED WITH APRIL, 1945 Life insurance sales____ -----------------------------· Retail sales ------------·--------------------------------· Farm cash income ---------------------------------· Bank debits ----·--··----------------------------------­Construction contracts -------------------------· Cotton consumption ----------------------------­Employment --------------------------------··---------­Pay rolls -------------------------·-----------------------· Postal receipts --------------------·------------------· Crude petroleum production_______________ _ Electric power consumption__________________ _ APRIL, 1946, COMPARED WITH MARCH, 1946 Farm cash income___________________________________ _ Retail sales --·-------------·----------·-----------------­Crude petroleum production _________________ _ Life insura nee sales____________________ ·------------­Electric power consumption_____ ______________ _ Pay rolls ------· -·------------------------------__ ___ ____ _ Employment -------------------------------------------· Postal receipts -----------------------------------····· Cotton consumption --·--------------------------­Bank debits -------------------------·-----------------· Construction contracts ------------------·------· TEN CENTS PER COPY ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR FIGURES FOR Tl-IE MONTI-I COMPOSITE INDEX OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY (1935-39= 100)* Index of department and apparel store sales---------------------------------------------------------------­ lndex of miscellaneous freight carloadings in Southwestern District______________________________ Index of crude oil runs to stills_____________________________________________________________________:____________________ Index of electric power consumption_____________________________________________________________ _ __ _ Index of employment----------------------------------------------------------------------­lndex of pay rolls--------------------------------------------------------------­ TRADE Retail sales of 922 independent stores--------------------------------------------------------------------------­ Ratio of credit sales to net sales in department and apparel stores____ __ _ _,_________________ Ratio of collections to outstandings in department and apparel stores_______________________ Ratio of credit salaries to credit sales in department and apparel stores__ _ _______________ Postal receipts in 52 cities--------------------------------------------------------------------------------­ PRODUCTION Southern pine production (weekly per unit average in board feetL---------------------------· Cotton consumption (running bales) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------­Cottonseed crushed (tonsl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------· Manufacture of dairy products (1000 lbs. milk equivalentl --------------~---------------------­Man-hours worked in 508 manufacturing establishments------------------------------------­Building permits in 45 cities-----------------------------------------------------------------­Construction contracts-----------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------­ lndustrial electric p,ower consumption for 10 companies (thousands of kilowatt hours) Crude petroleum production (daily average in barrelsl --------------------------------------------------­ AGRICULTURE Farm cash income____ -=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­Shipments of fruits and vegetables (carloadsl -------------------------------------------------------­Shipments of livestock (carloadsl ------------------------------------------------------------------------­Shipments of poultry and eggs (carloads) --------------------------------------------------------------­ FINANCE Bank debits in 20 cities (thousandsl -------------------------------------------------------------------------· Loans, reporting member banks in Dallas District (thousand;,) ----------------------------------­Loans and investments, reporting member banks in Dallas Di trict (thousands) -------­Demand deposits adjusted, reporting member banks in Dallas District (thousands)_______ Time deposits, reporting member banks in Dallas District (thousands) -------------------------­Ordinary life insurance sales (thousands) --------------------------------------------------------------------­ April March April1946 1946 1945 184.4 175.3 226.2 304.1 261.9 189.4 150.6 145.4 184.0 173.2 184.3 181.4 346.2 233.4 277.3 108.3 105.2 160.5 185.7 178.3 314.6 $36,582,036 $32,463,444 . $23,619,696 45.8% 47.4% 42.0% 68.6% 70.6% 66.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.5% $2,561,176 $2,568,153 $2,619,435 194,513 199,943 202,454 17,656 17,854 15,287 19,554 34,802 65,084 98,007 72,565 116,013 3,010,378 3,005,573 5,127,438 $19,633,641 $42,860,794 84,326,290 $41,682,822 $35,182,401 $71,388,452 210,326 203,574 258,113 2,007,050 1,817,500 2,163,550 $86,493,000 $56,630,000 $69,165,000 15,862 9,245 10,855 14,882 7,220 12,210 871 916 1,112 $2,387,615 $2,423,969 $1,963,287 $684,000 $691,000 $403,000 82,096,000 $2,141,000 $1,671,000 $1,413,000 $1,408,000 $1,269,000 $300,000 $295,000 $242,000 $69,008 $63,283 $35,208 *The composite index is made up of the indexes listed. All component indexes except employment and pay rolls are adjusted for seasonal variation, and all indexes are bas<: +12.3 Residua l .................... 16,421 16,917 22,850 -28.1. -2.9 Crude oil -----­----------­ 4,583 4,546 4,513 + 1.0. + 0.8 INLAND TEXAS Gasoline --­-­-----------­--12,308 12,532 11,829 + 4.0> - 1.8 Distillate -----­--­--------­ 1,285 -1 ,206 1,284 0.(). + 6.6 Residual -------------..·---­ 2,956 2,511 2,918 + 1.3. +17.7 Crude oil -----­-----------­ 862 852 969 - 11.0> + 1.2 *Figures shown for week ending nearest last day of :zn.onth. Pay rolls, however, decreased 0.9 % from March to April, 1946, and the April, 1946, figure was 21.8% be­low that for April, 1945. Although the total milk equivalent consumed in the manufacture of dairy products in April, 194.6, was 15.5% below the April, 1945, figure, it was 35.1 % above the March, 1946, figure. Creamery butter production dur­ing April, 1946, was 34.3% below the April, 1945, figure, although it represented an increase. of 26.4% above the amount for March, 1946. American cheese showed like tendencies, but larger percentage changes, the figure for April, 1946, being 41.8% below the April, 1945, figure, and 74.6% above the March, 1946, figure. In contrast to these changes, ice cream for April, 1946, showed an increase of 57.4% above the April, 1945, figure, as well as a gain of 22.8% above the March, 1946, figure. MANUFACTURE OF DAIRY PRODUCTS Percent change Product Unit Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. from from 1945 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 TOTAL MILK EQUIVALENT* 1,000 lbs. 98,007 72,565 116,013 -15.5 +35.1 Creamery butter. ___ 1,000 lbs. 2,106 1,666 3,206 -34.3 + 26.4 Ice creamt -----------­1,000 gal. 2,526 2,057 1,605 +57.4 +22.8 American cheese ____ 1,000 lbs. 992 568 1,704 -41.8 + 74.6 *Milk equivalent of dairy products was calculated from production data. tincludes sherbets and ices. The volume of canned grapefruit juice in Texas for the 1945-46 season (November I-April 27) was only slightly higher (1.1 % ) than for the 1944-45 season. Shipments, however, were 11.7% higher, whereas stocks on April 27, 1946, were 21.3% below those for the comparable date a year earlier. GRAPEFRUIT JUICE CANNING (in cases of 24/2's) Source: Texas Canners Association 1945-46 1944-45 Percent Item Season* Season• change Production ---·--·----------------------­ 9,111, 729 9,009,169 +u Shipments -----------------------------­ 6,915,440 6,192,479 + 11 .7 Stocks (Apr il 27) ---------------­ 2,217,875 2,816,690 -21.3 *November 1-April 27. Construction (Because of the accumulated deficiency of buildine in all sections of the State, data on the volume of construction work are an ex­tremely important part of the business situation. Building permits or contracts awarded are generally used to measure building activity. but it must be kept in mind that data on both permits and contracts reftect the value of new work begun, rather than the volume of actual conatruction activity in a particular month.) Building permits for April, 1946, for the 45 Texas cities listed in the accompanying table, were consider­ably lower than for March, 1946, having declined from $42,860,794 in March, 1946, to $19,633,641 durinu April, 1946. The figures for both April and March, BUILDING PERMITS City Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 TOTAL ------·­-------·-----------$19. 63 3. 641 $42,860, 794 $4,326,290 Abilene -···-----------------------­ 460,178 677,111 19,650 Amarillo -------------------------­ 6,577 1,1 06,507 104,187 Austin ---------------------­-­-----­ 1,648,116 1,917,725 135,773 Beaumont -----------­------­----­ 211,136 566,418 85,927 Big Spring -----­-----­----·­---­ 73,711 184,225 97,410 Brownsville -­-------------------­ 7,135 15il,440 9,400 Bryan -----····-··-·---------------­ 202.419 225,595 43,000 Childress --­--------------­-----­ 18,100 34,050 12,755 Cleburne ---····--·­·-------------­Coleman ------­-····-------------­Corpus Christi -------­-----­ 47,325 19,850 561,985 44,500 21,550 1,747,857 10,191•205,339 Corsicana -----------------­-----­ 67,116 32,027 9,750 Dallas ------------··--·---------­--4,295,400 6,452,619 644.~12 Denison ---------------·-----------­ 41,260 106,009 12,934 Denton --------------······--------­ 159,025 496,025 5,860 Edinburg -------------···-·-----­ 71,379 97,390 12,560 El Paso ·--------------··-··-----­ 286,338 350,590 49 ,338 Fort Worth ---------···-·-----­ 2,079,378 3,238,105 543,999 Gainesville ----------------­----­ 71,230 21,270 33,085 Galveston -----------------------­ 155,756 344,650 53,652 Gladewater -------------­----­-- 27,145 8,150 1,125 Harlingen ------···--------------­ 113,225 418,668 13,650 H ouston ------------------------­ 4,213,481 15,358,661 1,111,961 J acksonville -------------­-----­ 61,600 105,850 3,300 Kenedy ····-----------------------­ 13,310 51,200 5,500 Kerrville ·-····-----------------­-· 67,580 88,000 24,560 Longview ··-·-·····-----·······­ 56,065 133,407 5,050 Lubbock -------------------------­ 300,699 752,725 133,337 McAllen -------------------·-···-­ 199,680 430,985 59,005 Marshall ······-----­-------­-----­ 59,119 158,678 11,034 Midland -------­-·······-------­---­ 145,500 443,650 61,650 New Braunfels -----------­-­ 22,170 99,120 5,630 Pampa ·······-···-----­-------­-- 163,750 96,700 60,600 Paris -···--····--·---·-······--·----­ 122,250 56,595 15,050 Plainview -----------··········--­ 74,350 244,000 15,325 Port Arthur -----------­----··· 115,785 299,689 66,607 San Antonio ··-····--­---------­ 1,829,732 4,641i,577 433,361 Seguin ············----------------­ 8,200 58,500 1,100 Sherman -----­-------------­----­ 468,346 202,336 55,884 Sweetwater -···-------······-··-­ 99,240 64,585 8,545 Texas City -----·····--­----···­- 34,898 145,100 4,595 Tyler ···----------------·······-···­- 285,877 356,690 57,336 Victoria ----­----------­--------­ 86,525 93,475 11,630 W aco ·····--·······-···-·········---­ 379,565 519,973 57,840 Wichita Falls ····----------···­ 202,135 209,817 23,403 1946, were considerably higher than for the comparable months of 1945. During April, 1946, Dallas led in value of building permits with Houston a close second; in both cases, the figures for April, 1946, were lower than for March, 1946, and in the case of Houston, con­siderably lower. Fort Worth was third and Austin fourth in rank as to value of building permits for April, 1946; no other Texas cities went above the $1,000,000 mark for this month. Construction contracts in Texas for April, 1946, ac­cording to the data in the accompanying table, were 18.5% higher than in March, 1946, but were 41.6% below those for April, 1945. The largest category for April, 1946, was residential building, which was 84.9% above the March, 1946, figure, and more than ten times greater than the March, 1945, amount. The engineer­ing construction category also registered a considerable gain for April, 1946, over the March, 1946, figure, as well as over that for March, 1945. Nonresidential build­ing contracts for April, 1946, registered a decrease of 34.5% below the March, 1946, figure and a decrease of 52.3% below that for April, 1945. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Source: T exas Contractor ~---=-============================= Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Type of Apr. Mar. Apr. from from building 1946 1946 1945 Apr. 1945 Mar. l!M6 .--------·---------·----­ TOTAL ..........$41,682,822 $35,182,401 $71,388,452 + 41.6 + 18.5 Engineering .. 10,229,387 3,748,369 2,465,604 + 314.9 + 172.9 Non resident ial 14,611,435 22,324,332 30,619,686 -52.3 -34.5 Residential .... 16,842,000 9,109,700 1,407,299 + 1196.8 + 84.9 War construe- tion ---····-····-· ............... . 3,403,274 Although the number of all loans by savings and loan associations in Texas decreased by 3.4% from March to April, 1946, the numbers for both of these months were considerably above the fi gures for the correspond­ing months of 1945. On the other hand, the amount of all such loans for April, 1946, was 5.8% above the March, 1946, figure, and the April, 1946, amount was 174% above that of April, 1945. Of the various categories of loans in April, 1946, purchase loans out­ranked by far all others in amount of loans made, while loans for construction ranked second. LOANS BY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS Source: Federal H ome Loan Bank of Little Rock Percent change Type Apr. 1!}46 Mar. 1946 Apr . 1946 Apr. 1946 Ap r. from from 1945 A pr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Number ALL LOANS 2,381 2,464 1,197 + 98.9 -3.4 Construction -------­ 461 406 88 +423.9 + 13.6 Purch ase. ------·--------­ 1,475 1,510 792 + 86.2 -2.3 Refinance --­---------­ 155 230 95 + 63.2 -32.6 R econdition ---------­ 152 138 138 + 10.1 + 10.1 Other --------­----­-­----­ 138 180 84 + 64.3 -23.3 Amount ALL LOANS ...... $S,785,367° $8,300 ,240 $3,206,077 + 174.0 + 5.8 ·--­-­ Construction ·········· 1,946,178 1,325,503 260,151 + 648.1 +46.8 Purchase ················ 5,927,096 5,622,721 2,318,148 + 155.7 + 5.4 R efi na nce -----------­-­ 401,690 732,756 280,430 + 43.2 -45.2 Recondit ion ----­----­ 176,477 135 ,262 147,729 + 19.5 +3o.5 Other --­--------------­---­ 333,926 483,998 199,619 + 67.3 -31.0 Public Utilities (The consumption of electric power by industrial concerns is a measure of the volume of industrial activity, since it may be as­sumed that the amount of power used will be directly related to manufacturing volume. Residential and commercial power consump~ tion shows a seasonal variation due to the changing amount of li&'hting needed.) Texas electric power consumption during April, 1946, according to reports of 10 electric power companies, registered a gain of 6.3% over March, 1946, although it was 8.0% below the figure for April, 1945. Commercial power consumption registered the largest monthly increase of the several categories and the largest group, industrial power consumption, showed a gain of 3.3%. Industrial power consumption in April, 1946, was 18.5% below that for April, 1945. On the other hand, residential power consumption was 20.3% greater than for April, 1945, and was 2.5% above the March, 1946, figure. ELECTRIC POWER CONSUMPTION• (in millions of kilowatt hours) P ercent chanire Us e A pr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 from from A pr. 194.5 Mar. 1946 TOTAL ...................... 429,495 404, 144 466,697 - 8.0 + 6.3 ---­·­ ------­. --~----­·-­~ Com mer cial ·------------­ 89,154 78,184 81,696 + 9.1 + 14.0 Industr ial ·················· 21 0,326 203,574 258,113 -18.5 + 3.3 Residential ········-------­ 65,913 64,290 54,778 +20.3 + 2.5 Other -------·----------·-··-­ 64,101 58,096 72,110 -11.1 +lo.s •Prepared from reports of 10 <>lect ric power companies to the Bureau of Business Research. Electric energy production in Texas for March, 1946, was 6.6% above the figure for February, 1946, but was 8.7% below the March, 1945, amount. For the United States, electric energy production for March, 1946, showed a gain of 9.9% above the February, 1946, figure, but was 8.9% below the figure for March, 1945. ELECTRIC ENERGY PRODUCTION* (in thousands of kilowatt hours) Sou rce: Federal Power Commission Percent chanire P lace Mar. 1946 F eb. 1946 Mar. 1945 Mar. 1946 Mar. 1946 from from Mar. 1945 Feb. 1946 Texas ...................... 547,695 513,914 600,048 -8.7 +6.6 United States ·-····· 17,788,389 16,193,296 19,526,557 -8.9 +9.9 ----·---·.=·======:== ==== •Amount produced for public use. Natural Resources (The production of crude petroleum is a major industry In Texa1, and the changes in the volume of production have a direct effect upon the income produced in the State. Fiirures on the number of well completions by districts indicate the extent to which new sources of oil and gas are being developed and the areas of the State in which drilling operations are in proceas.) The daily average production in Texas of crude pe­troleum during April, 1946, was 10.4% greater than for March, 1946. All districts registered increases, and East Texas, Coastal Texas, and West Texas showed gains of 10% or more. Daily average production for the United States during April, 1946, was only 4.7% greater than for March, 1946. April, 1946, production in Texas was 3.8% less than for April, 1945, but it was 10.4% above the March, 1946, figure. The April, 1946, figures for all Texas districts except North Texas were below those for April, 1945. The greatest percentage change was registered by Coastal Texas, the amount for April, 1946, being 17.2% below that for April, 1945. Texas had 607 well completions in April, 1946; of these, 386 were oil wells, 33 were gas wells, and 188 were dry holes. North Central Texas led in number of completions as well as in number of dry holes. West Texas led in number of oil wells; North Central Texas ranked second, followed by the Gulf Coast. To date in 1946, North Central Texas leads in number of comple­tions, followed in order by the Gulf Coast and West Texas. DAILY AVERAGE OF CRUDE PETROLEUM (in barrels) Source: American Petroleum Institute Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 District Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 from from Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 TEXAS ______,,___________ 2,007,050 1,817,500 2,163,650 - 7.2 +10.4 Coastal Texas -·-----­ 468,000 418,800 665,250 -17.2 +11.7 East Central Texas 137,400 127.500 138.550 -0. 8 + 7.8 East Texas -------------­ 360,800 317,400 378,100 - 4.6 +13.7 North Texas ............ 166,300 146,060 150.000 + 4.2 + 7.0 Panhandle -------------­ 82,000 81,000 90,000 - 8.9 + 1.2 Southwest Texas .... 318,800 290,200 352,150 - 9.5 + 9.9 West Texas .............. 483,760 436,550 489,600 - 1.2 +lo.8 UNITED STATES 4,624,050 4,418,250 4,804,815 -3.8 + 4.7 •Includes Conroe. WELL COMPLETIONS Source: The Oil and Gas Journal April• Jan.-Apr. (all wells) District Total Oil Gas Dry 1946 1945 TEXAS 386 33 188 2,515 2,297 -------------------------------607 North Central Texas.......... 213 102 2 109 861 660 West Texas .......................... 127 109 17 537 602 Panhandle ---------------------­ 30 16 9 6 122 191 Eastern Texas -----------------­ 52 43 2 7 238 101 Texas Gulf Coast................ 131 89 18 24 572 629 Southwest Texas --------------­ 54 27 26 186 214 = •For four weeks ending April 27. AGRICULTURE Income (The amount of income received by farmers ia a composite meaaure of the prosperity of airriculture, taking into account both the volume of products sold and the prices received. Since the marketinc• of m•ny products are concentrated in certain seasons of the year, It Is important that the data be adjusted for seasonal variation In order to ahow the basic changes in the situation of •irriculture.) Texas farmers received approximately $86,000,000 from marketings of agricultural commodities during April this year, according to Bureau of Business Re­search estimates, and the index of farm cash income in April, adjusted for seasonal variation, was more than three times as great as in the average month of the pre­war years 1935-39. Compared with April, 1945, income last month was up more than 50%, and compared with March, 1946, it was about 25% greater. Higher prices and greater volume marketings com­bined to effect the over-all upturn in farm income in April. Fruit and vegetables were sold in record volume, as reflected in the index number of 961.5 (1935-39 average = 100) for District 10-A, the principal pro­ducing area at this time. Livestock sales continued to increase, yielding about three-fifths of all cash farm income in April. FARM CASH INCOME* Indexes, 1935-39=100, adjusted for seasonal Tariatlon Amount. Jan.-Apr. (in thousands of doll&n) District Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1946 1946 1945 TE'XAS ------------313.2 250.4 278.2 249,640 290,211 1-N -----------------­294.1 253.4 305.1 26,212 33,691 1-S --··-------------­310.3 293.8 380.6 18,229 29,330 2 ------------------------255.6 171.4 217.3 1'6,186 30,938 3 ........................ 254.8 152.4 171.1 8,619 11,628 4 ---------------------­160.7 187.8 228.7 26,106 36,367 5 ---------------------­204.4 188.1 194.2 8,688 11,250 6 -------­--------------­317.3 224.5 304.1 14,884 14,441 7 -----------------------­483.0 277.7 212.4 17,594 14,832 8 -----------------------­466.5 230.1 291.4 23,024 21,333 9 ---------------­------­219.3 149.9 195.4 14,008 23,032 10 -----------------------­246.0 278.6 167.8 17,302 14,683 10-A ................ 961.5 545.1 770.5 58,888 50,186 •Farm cash income as computed by the Bureau understates actual farm cash income by from 6 to lOo/o. This situation results from the fact that means of securing comi>lete local marketings, espe--­cially by truck, have not yet been fully developed. In addition, means have not yet been developed for computing cash income from all a~rf.. cultural specialties of local importance in scattered areas. This aitua­tion does not impair the accuracy of the indexes. Although income in the month of April showed decided gains over last April, income for the first four months of the current year has fallen some 14% below that for the comparable period of 1945. This decline has been due principally to the sharp drop in cotton pro­duction last season as compared to previous years. In fact, Texas cotton output in the 1945 season hit a 46-year low, according to the United States Department of Agri­culture, which estimated the 1945 crop at 1, 794,000 bales. Both the acreage harvested and the yield per acre were far below the level of previous years. Prices (One of the elements that brlnir about chanires In the level of farm income is the price received for products; ao chanires In prices are of primary concern to tha farmer and all hualneuea relylnir 011 the farm market.) Continuing an uptrend noted for the past several months, prices received by Texas farmers for most field crops and livestock again advanced in April. Cotton rose two cents per pound to reach its highest April level since 1923, according to the United States Depart­ment of Agriculture in its mid-April report on Texas farm prices. Cottonseed rose $1.00 a ton, while cattle and calves brought 30 cents more per hundredweight and sheep 10 cents more than a month earlier. Corn, grain sorghum, and oats were up slightly, along with oranges and grapefruit. Price declines were shown in relatively few items-rice, eggs, beets, cabbage, and potatoes-­most of which resulted from the normal seasonal factors of supply and demand. Compared with a year ago, most farm product prices were up substantially in April this year. The actual prices are shown in the accompanying table. The national index of prices paid by farmers rose again between March and April, moving from 187 to 188% of the 1910-14 average. Measured by the index are both commodities used in farm family living and commodities used in farm production. The April index -----------· ----------·· ---· --·--------··--·----­ -.------------·------·-----·-·---------·-----­ LOCAL BUSI NE Percent change Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 ABILENE Apr. from from CORSICANA Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 18 stores.................... $402,487 + 62.0 + 18.0 Postal receipts .................................... $9,430 -11.7 + 23.6 +588.4 +109.6 Postal receipts .................................... $29,126 -11.9 + 10.2 Building permits ··············-------·········· $67,116 Building permits ................................ $460,178 + 134.2 -32.0 Bank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) .................................... $7,402 -26.7 -2.3 (thousands ) .................................... $22,901 + 45.6 2.5 Placements in employment__ ___________ 682 + 35.0 + 9.8 Civilian labor force·--·------------------------20,872 -82.7 + 1.0 Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Percent change DALLAS Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 AMARILLO Apr. from from Retail sales of 28 stores................._.$7,782,531 ' + 58.7 + 7.0 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Postal receipts .................................... $648,347 + 12.5 -1.3 Retail sales of 22 stores.................... $407,473 + 54.3 + 6.8 Building permits ................................$4,295,400 +566.0 -33.4 Postal receipts .................................. $57,696 -2.4 + 10.8 Bank debits to individual accounts Building permits ................................ $6,577 -93.7 -99.4 (thousands) .................................... $699,336 + 28.2 + 10.2 Bank debits to individual accounts Placements in employment.____________ 4,153 -40.0 3.8 (thousands ) --------------····················· $54,442 + 19.7 + Q.6 Civilian labor force____________________________ 207,932 + 6.5 + 4.2 Placements in employment.............. 738 -32.9 + 8.2 Civilian labor force ....-----------------····-· 27,655 -4.5 + 2.4 Percent changePercent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 EL PASO Apr. from AUSTIN from Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 14 stores....................$2,034,885 + 52.8 + 19.4 Retail sales of 15 stores.....-.............$1,211,100 + 77.4 + 12.8 Postal receipts ·····················--------·-···· $94,761 0.0 + 4.2 Postal receipts ···············-·············-····· $107,676 + 0.2 + 2.0 Building permits ·········-············--······· $286,338 +480.3 -18.2 Jluilding permits ................................$1,648,116 + 1111.4 -14.1 Bank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands ) ...................................... $79,546 + 41.2 -2.0 (thousands) .................................... $84,142 + 27.0 -20.5 Placements in employment______________ 531 -49.3 -14.2 Placements in employment____ _________ 1,047 + 0.6 + 11.9 Civilian labor force____________________________ 48,000 + 2.3 + 0.8 Ci~ilian labor force______________________ ______ 45,690 + 8.5 -1.8 . 777 Real ostate transfers (number) ...... + 55.4 -35.4 Percent changePercent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. rn46 FORT WORTH Apr. from fromBEAUMONT Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 28 stores....______________.$3,400,974 + 49.8 + 12.5 Itetail sales of 12 stores ....................$1,287,767 + 132.0 + 72.2 Postal receipts .................................... $264,606 + 6.1 -13.5 Postal receipts .................................... $50,766 + 1.8 + 18.6 Building permits ··················-·····-------$2,079,378 +282.2 -35.8 Buildini: permits ................................ $211,136 + 145.7 -62.7 Bank debits to individual accounts ' Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) ·--------·························· $209,835 + 9.3 3.8 Placements in employment______________ 2,907 -35.6 3.1 (thousands) .................................... $55,627 + 5.4 5.4 Placements in employment (area ) 1,792 -52.5 + 2.6 Civilian labor force____________________________ 123,900 -9.0 + 2.5 Civilian labor force (area) .............. 93,655 -1.5 + 1.0 Percent change Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 CORPUS CHRISTI Apr. from from Apr. 194' Apr. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 GALVESTON Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946Retail sales of 23 stores.__________________ $997,742 + 53,2 + 13.2 -8.4 Postal receipts ··················-········--····· $66,669 + 5.2 Postal receipts ··--·-···········-················· $56,869 + 5.6 + 6.3 Building permits ·············"·················· +190.3 Buildini: permits ................................ $561,985 + 173.7 -67.8 $155,756 -54.8 :Rank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) .................................... $67,564 + 30.0 -4.2 (thousands) .................................... $50,697 + 24.1 -13.5 Placements in employment____ __ ________ 1,008 + 23.8 + 79.7 Placements in employment (area) 1,641 -21.0 + 3.7 Civilian labor force_.......................... 54,~00 -8.7 + 1.5 Civilian labor force (area) ·····-······· 52,600 -6.4 + 0.9 0 _____ =____ _ =__ 2 C0 NDI T I0 NS_ : ______ ___:::__ = == Percent change Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 HOUSTON Apr. from from SAN ANGELO Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 39 stores____________$3,615,117 + 59.4 + 12.7 Retail sales of 10 stores___________________ $447,916 + 45.1 + 9.9 Postal receipts ----------------------------------$407,993 + 1.8 -4.3 Postal receipts ------------------------------------$23,182 -12.9 + 2.8 Building permits -------------------------------$4,213,481 +278.9 -72.6 Bank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) -----------------------------------$23,929 + 55.6 + 13.8 (thousands) --------------------------------$624,524 + 10.7 -6.4 Placements in employment____________ 4,488 -57.1 + 13.7 Civilian labor force_________________________ 309,235 -0.3 + 0.6 Percent change Apr.1946 Apr. 1946 SAN ANTONIO Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Percent change Retail sales of 42 stores____________________$4,072,789 + 43.5 + 4.3 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Postal r¢ceipts --------------------------------$258,592 + 0.7 + 10.5 JACKSONVILLE Apr. from from Building permits -------------------------------Sl,829,772 +322.2 -60.6 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Bank debits to individual accounts Retail sales of 11 stores·-------------------$527,908 + 58.6 + 7.0 (thousands ) ------------------------------------$201,146 + 36.4 2.1 Postal receipts -----------------------------------$5,780 -9.5 + 5.3 Placement in employment________________ 2,016 -33.0 + 0.6 Building permits --------------------------$61,600 +1766.7 -41.8 Civilian labor force_ _______________________ 177,404 + 40.2 + 1.8 Percent change Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 TYLER Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. from from LUBBOCK Apr_ from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 12 stores_:__________________ $526,461 + 55.8 + 12.0 Retail sales of 15 stores___________________ $603,976 + 60.6 + 18.1 Postal receipts -----------------------------------$27,994 -5.9 + 4.S -4.0 ­ Postal receipts ---------------------------------$32,939 + 11.1 Building permits ------------------------------'-$285,877 +398.6 19.9 Building permits ---------------------·-------$300,699 +125.5 -60.1 Bank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) -----------------------------------$31,021 + 31.3 + 3.9 (thousands) ------------------------------$38,559 + 34.5 -1.9 Placements in employment_____________ 788 + 70.9 + 29.8 Civilian labor force___________________________ 30,979 + 46.3 + 0.4 Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946WACO Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Percent change Retail sales of 23 stores____________________ $977,938 + 51.9 + 8.8 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Postal receipts ------------------------------------$58,770 -4.3 .+ 12.2 PLAINVIEW Apr. from from Building permits --------------------------------$379,5C5 +556.2 -27.t 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Bank debits to individual accounts Retail sales of 13 stores____ _______________ $136,961 + 46.5 + 20.2 $37,193 + 42.7 -14.4 (thousands) -----------------------------------­Postal receipt. ------------------------------------$6,734 + 1.3 + 0.9 Placements in employment______________ 725 -15.6 + 20.6 Civilian labor force____________________________ Building permits --------------------------$74,350 +385.2 -69.5 52,000 + 9.2 + 1.0 Percent change Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 WICHITA FALLS Apr. horn from Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 PORT ARTHUR 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Apr. from from 1946 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Retail sales of 14 stores___________________ $400,31& + 78.4 + 23.2 Postal receipts --------------------------------­$26,549 -7.1 + 9.1 Postal receipts -----------------------------------$47,875 -3.4 + 13.6 Buildinc permits ---------------------------­$115,785 + 73.8 -61.4 Building permits ------------------------------$202,135 + 763.7 -3.7 Bank debits to individual accounts Bank debits to individual accounts (thousands) ---------------------------­$25,855 + 12.1 0.2 (thousands) ---------------------------------$37,912 + 30.2 -12.7 Placements in employment (area) 1,792 -52.5 Placements in employment____________ 452 -36.2 + 3.2 + 2.6 Civilian labor force (areal ----------93,655 -1.5 + 1.0 Civilian labor force__________________________ 34,869 + 45.1 + 0.9 was 8 points higher than a year ea~lier. Accordi~1g to tl.1e United States Department of Agnculture, the mdex m April was 50% higher than the 1934-39 averag~, 187o higher than the 1919-29 average, but it was still con­siderably below the 1919 peak. PRICES OF TEXAS FARM PRODUCTS Source: Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U.S. Department or Airriculture Commodity Unit Apr. 1946 Mar.1946 Apr. 1945 Cotton........ ·--------­lb. $' 0.244 $ 0.2U $ 0.189 Cottonseed........... -­ton 55.00 54.00 53.00 Wheat..-----·­····-····· bu. 1.55 1.55 1.47 Corn... -------············· bu. 1.36 1.35 1.23 Grain sorghums .... cwt. 2.45 2.35 1.72 Oats.......................... bu. 0.84 0.81 0.79 Rice_______________________, bu. 1.88 1.92 1.89 Cattle_____·······--·-···­cwt. 12.50 12.20 11.70 Calv.......................... cwt. 13.80 13.50 13.00 Hogs............. ---·····-·· cwt. 14.00 14.00 13.60 Sheep ...................... cwt. 7.80 7.70 7.90 WooL---··-----··­·-···· lb. 0.42 0.40 0.41 Eggs ..­..................... doz. 0.295 0.304 0.312 Butterfat.. ------··-··· lb. 0.49 0.49 0.48 Grapefruit_________ box 1.31 1.14 1.33 Oranges•----­-----------box 2.59 2.50 2.46 Beets........... ·------~ crate 1.65 2.73 2.58 Cabbage ·············-··· ton 50.80 55.06 30.18 P otatoes........ ---····" 50 lb, sack 1.88 2.22 2.66 Carrots..................... crate 2.89 2.43 1.95 Tomatoes..... L ......... lugs 3.23 3.26 Onions............... -­~ 50 lb. sack 2.37 1.80 •Equivalent on-tree returns for all methods of sale. Marketings (The level of farm Income is affected not only by changes in prices, but by the volume of products farmers send to market in a l'iven month. Data on shipments of farm products must also be used to explain the changes in the level of farm Income from month te montlo..) Marketings of fruits and vegetables, poultry and eggs, and livestock, as reflected by rail shipments of those items from principal producing areas, showed large gains over last month and over April of last year. Rail shipments of fruits and vegetables, totaling 15,862 carloads, were 58.5% higher in April than a month RAIL SHIPMENTS OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES Chi carloads) Percent change Item Apr. 19.(6 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 from from Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 15,862 9,245 10,855 +46.1 +58.5 TOTAL -------------------­ Beets ---------------------­ 222 443 466 - 52.4 -49.9 Cabbage ----------············ 476 1,858 469 + 1.5 -74.4 Carrots --------------­ 776 1,537 863 - 10.1 -49.5 Corn ---­--------------------­ 333 481 - 30.8 Cucumbers ---­-------­ 141 Grapefruit ----------­ 3,628 4,021 3,037 +19.5 -9.8 Onions ----­---------------­ 5,837 2,588 + 125.5 Oranges -----------------­ 591 1,174 769 - 23.2 -49.7 Potatoes ------------------­ 1,987 212 708 + 180.6 +837.2 Tomatoes ·­---------­-­-- 1,871 1,474 + 26.9 *Fi2urea for oranges and irrapefruit include both rail and truck shipmenta. earlier. A record onion crop along with large potato and tomato shipments helped to swell the total, while shipments of beets, cabbage, carrots, oranges, and grape­fruit fell off as their respective seasons drew to a close. Shipments of fruits and vegetables last month exceeded the April, 1945, volume by 4.6.1%. Cabbage, grapefruit, onions, potatoes, and tomatoes were shipped in greater quantities than a year ago, whereas shipments of beets, carrots, and oranges showed declines under April, 1945. A year ago between March and April the total ship­ments dropped off 2.1 ){, and only oranges, onions, and potatoes went up. Livestock shipments by rail showed outstanding gains in all categories of livestock animals, both when com­pared to April, 1945, and to March, 1946. Total ship­ments in April this year were more than twice the size of those in April a year ago and were more than one­fifth larger than in the preceding month of this year. In the yearly comparison April sheep marketings climbed over 100%, calves 50%, hogs 21 %, and cattle about 14%. Over the month, cattle and sheep ship­ments were up more than 100%, calves more than 50%, but the movement of hogs was cut down 8%. SHIPMENTS OF LIVESTOCK (in carloads)• Source: Bureau of Busine£!1:s Research in co-operation with the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U.S. Department of Agriculture Percent change Classification Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 Apr. 194& Apr. 1946 from from Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 TOTAL SHIPMENTS ...... 14,882 7,220 12,210 + 21.9 +106.1 Cattle ·····-···················-------11,478 4,935 10,086 + 13.8 +132.6 Calves --------------------------·--­1,089 713 725 + 50.2 + 52.7 Hogs ----------------------------­-­ 740 804 613 + 20.7 -8.0 Sheep ----­-------­------------------­ 1,575 768 786 +100.4 +105.l INTERSTATE PLUS FORT WORTH _________13,604 6,238 11,139 + 22.1 +118.1 Cattle ·----------·········-······­-10,516 4,157 9,189 + 14.4 +153.0 Calves --------------------······-­ 939 552 594 + 58.1 + 70.1 Hogs -----------------­------·-·------­ 733 787 607 + 20.8 -6.9 Sheep --·­---···-­---------------·····-­ 1,416 742 749 + 89.1 + 90.8 INTRASTATE MINUS FORT WORTHt -···-··· 1,278 982 1,071 + 19.3 + 30.1 Cattle --·--·--·······--·-----------·-·· 962 778 897 + 7.2 + 23.6 Calves -------------·-·--------····· 150 161 131 + 14.5 -6.8 Hogs ···-----------------------------·-7 17 6 + 16.6 -58.8 Sheep --------------··-·-----------·-·· 159 26 37 +829.7 +511.5 •Rail-car basis : cattle, 30 head per car; calves, 60; hogs, 80; and sheep, 250. · tintrastate truck shipments are not included. Fort Worth ship­ ments are combined with interstate forwardings in order that the bul,k of market disappearance for the mollth may be shown. Poultry and eggs shipped from Texas stations in April did not differ materially from the amount shipped dur­ing March this year. Chicken shipments showed no change (20 cars each month); turkey shipments ad­vanced by some 30 carloads. On the other hand, the shell-egg equivalent of shell, frozen, and dried eggs shipped fell about 75 carloads. The bulk of Texas poultry and egg shipments continued to go to markets outside the State. In comparison with April a year ago, considerably more chickens and turkeys were marketed, but fewer eggs, especially eggs in the shell, were shipped. There was an increase in the volume of frozen eggs marketed, however, of some 15 carloads. As shipments of eggs from Texas declined during the past month, receipts from out of the State went up markedly. A similar movement prevailed between March and April, 1945, in the interstate receipts of eggs at Texas stations. More than five times as many carloads of eggs were shipped from this State in April, however, as came in from out of the State. RAIL SHIPMENTS OF POULTRY AND EGGS FROM TEXAS STATIONS (in carloads ) Source: Bureau of Business Research in cooperation w ith the Division of Agricultural Statistics, Bureau of Airr!cu!tural Economics, U .S. Department of Agriculture Apr. Mar. Apr. Claaslf!cat!on 1946 1946 1945 TOTAL SHIPMENTS Chickens ··········-··-·--·--····-··-·-····· 20 20 2 Turkeys ····----------·······­-····---------­ 44 14 0 Eggs---i!hell equivalent* ····--··-·······-·· 807 882 1,110 Shell ----­-·············-··--­·········-··-·-··-·· 25 21 86 Frozen ··············--·-··························--··· 135 114 120 Dried ·····················-·····--·-···--···········-· 64 79 98 INTRASTATE SHIPMENTS Chickens ····-·-·······-·-···················-······-····· 0 2 0 Turkeys ··················-····-·········-····-···········-· 5 4 0 Eggs--<1hell equivalent* --······················ 148 82 308 Shell ·-········------------·····-·-·····-·--····· 12 6 26 Frozen ·····--------··········--·--·····-·-···· 40 34 73 Dried ·····-----·······-················--··-·········· 7 17 INTERSTATE SHIPMENTSt Chickens ····················---···-·······-·--··-··-· 20 18 2 Turkeys ··-·­···­········--········--·-·········-· 39 10 0 Eggs---i!hell equivalent* -·······--·····-· 659 799 802 Shell ······-··-····-··-·····-···--···-·-··········· 13 15 60 Frozen ······------·-······-··-···-·········-­ 95 80 47 Dried ···---~----····--·-·····-····-··-··---­ 57 78 81 •Dried eggs and frozen eggs are converted to a shell-egg equivalent on the following basis: 1 rail-carload of dried eggs= 8 carloads of shell eggs and 1 carload of frozen eggs=2 carloads of shell eggs. tThe destination above is the first destination as shown by the ori~inal waybill. Changes in destination brought about by diversion factors are not shown. INT.ERSTATE RECEIPTS OF EGGS BY RAIL AT TEXAS STATIONS (in carloads) Source : Bureau of Business Research in co-operation with the Division of Agricultural Statistics, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. Department of Agriculture Type Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 TOTAL RECEIPTS­SHELL EQUIVALENT* ······--··-·-·-···-·····-·· 133 67 357 Shell ·······-·····································-·······-··· 15 3 29 Frozen ······--····-······························-····--·-·· 55 28 76 Dried ···············-···································-···-··· 22 *Dried eggs and frozen eggs are converted to a shell-egg equivalent on the following basis: 1 rail-carload of dried eggs = 8 carloads of shell eggs and 1 carload of frozen eggs = 2 carloads of shell eggs. Cotton (The cotton balance sheet shows the basic demand and supply factors affecting cotton, which is an outstanding element In the farm income of the State.) Figures in the cotton balance sheet do not tell the whole story of the cotton supply. For one thing, the commitments for exports for the remainder of this crop year are much larger than is indicated by the average of exports to the end of March, the latest official figures. The proportion of qualities making up the balance is much more important. The prospective carryover of all cotton outside of mills in the United States promises to be less than 6,000,000 bales on August 1, of which an unusually large percentage will be low grade long staple cotton or very short staple. Because of the reduced supply and the unusual quality of it, the cotton market will be very sensitive to weather changes for the next six months. The size and quality of the new crop have already assumed dominant position in price movements. It is the first time in eight year!! that we have had such a condition as can be inferred from the balance sheet. (The foregoing table and analysis of the cotton bal­ance sheet were prepared by Dr. A. B. Cox, professor of cotton marketing in the College of Business Administra­tion at The University of Texas.) COTTON BALANCE SHEET FOR THE UNITED STATES AS OF MAY 1, 1946 CarryoTer Year Auirust 1 1936-37 5,397 ·-··-----------------------------· 1937-38 ---------------------------4,498 1938-39 ··-·········-····-············--11,533 1939-40 ·-·········-········-········--·· 13,033 1940-41 ----10,596 --------------------------·-­ 1941-42 ----·········-··········--· 12,367 1942-43 10,590 1943-44 10,687 -------------·--------·--··---­ 1944-45 10,727 1945-46 11,164 (in thousands of running bales except as noted) Imports to May 1* Final ginnings Total Consumption to Mayl Exports to Mayl Total Balance as of Mayl 167 12,130 17,694 6,017 4,762 10,779 6,915 99 18,242 22,839 4,430 5,034 9,464 13,375 108 11,621 23,262 5,153 2,964 8,117 15,145 123 11,477 24,638 5,955 5,695 11,650 12,893 119 12,287 23,002 6,993 885 7,878 15,124 t 10,489 22,856 8,250 t 8,250 14,606 t 12,437 23,027 8,440 t 8,440 14,687 80 11,121 21,888 7,580 975 8,555 13,333 106t 11,806 22,638 7,286 1,150t 8,436 14,202 200§ 8,781 20,145 6,772 2,001§ 8,773 11,372 °Fieurea are in 600-pound bales. tFigures not available. tFigures to January 31 (New York Cotton Exchange). §Figures to April l , 1946. TEXAS BUSINESS REVIEW Reports from banks in 20 Texas c1t1cs indicate that FINANCE bank debits in April were 21.6% above those in April, 1945. The increase was general and occurred in all of Bank Credit the reporting centers, although there was considerable (Since bank: credit is essential to all business, the condition of the variation in the amounts of increase. The largest per­commercial banks and the Federal Reserve Banks is a significant indicator of the state of business. Changes in the volume of credit centage gains occurred in Abilene, El Paso, San Angelo, the banks have outstanding reflect the state of business. The con· dition of the Federal Reserve Banks in like manner reflects the con­dition of credit available to commercial banks.) CONDITION OF WEEKLY REPORTING MEMBER BANKS* Total loans of weekly reporting member banks in the Dallas Federal Reserve District showed little change Source : Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System between March and April, 1946, but were approxi­mately 70% greater than those of a year earlier. Hold­Percent change ings of Treasury bills at the end of April this year were Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1945 10% below those a year ago and there was a slight re­from from from Item Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Mar, 1945 duction in holdings of United States Treasury notes. ASSETS Weekly reporting member banks reduced their holdings Loans and investments ----------------------------+ 25.4 -14.0 + 0.4 of Treasury certificates of indebtedness and Treasury -1.0 -1.0 Loans ----------------------------------------------------------+ 69.7 Treasury bills _______________:_____________________________ -10.0 bonds during April, but at the end of the month hold­+ 14.9 -7.7 Treasury certificates of indebtedness ...... + 8.2 -7.7 + 2.1 ings of both types were larger than a year earlier. De­ Treasury notes ---------------------------------------------5.8 + 0.5 + 1.8 mand deposits at the end of April were 11 % higher United States bonds ---------------------------------+ 22.7 -1.7 + 0.4 than a year ago, while during the same period time Other securities ------------------------------------------+ 41.7 + 3.0 + 4.3 deposits increased 26% and United States Government Reserve with Federal Reserve Banks...... + 13.5 -2.0 + 5.6 Cash in vault-----------------------------------------------4.2 -11.1 deposits increased 143%. Balances with domestic banks__________________ -2. 7 -0.5 -3.9 The Dallas Federal Reserve Bank reduced its hold­ LIABILITIES ings of United States Government securities 4.1 % dur­ Demand deposits adjusted............ ------------+ 11.3 + 0.4 + 3.1 ing April, but they were still about 20% greater than a Time deposits ----------------------------------------------+ 25.5 + 1.7 + 3.0 year ago. The volume of Federal Reserve notes of that United States Government deposits ........ + 142.7 -17.1 -27.5 Bank outstanding declined slightly during the month, Interbank deposits: but was still 4.0% above that at the end of April, 1945. Domestic banks ------------------------------------+ 5.4 -2.3 + 5.1 Foreign banks -----------------------------------------33.3 -33.3 CAPITAL ACCOUNTS --------------------------+ 18.0 + 3.6 Bank Debits *Percentage comparisons based on ending close (Since the bulk of business transactions are settled by check, week nearest the of calendar month. changes in bank debits represent changes in the volume of transac­tions and are a basic measure of business activity.) SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF THE FEDERAL , RESERVE B.ANK OF DALLAS BANK DEBITS* (in thousands of dollars) (in thousands of dollars) Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Source : Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Percent change Percent change Apr. Apr. 1946 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 from from Apr. Mar. Apr. from from May 1 Mar. 27 May2 Apr. Mar. City 1946 19·46 1945 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Classification 1946 1946 1945 1945 1946 TOTAL ----------------2,387,615 2,423,969 1,963,287 +21.6 -1.5 ASSETS Abilen~ _________________ 22,901 23,477 15,724 +45.6 -2.5 Gold certificate reserves__ 517,918 477,743 528,024 -1.9 + 8.4 Amarillo ______________ 54,442 54,100 45,481 +19.7 + 0.6 U.S. Government securi­ties 867,512 904,421 723,868 +19.8 -4.1 Austin -----------------­84,142 105,825 66,252 +27.o -20.5 Discounts and advances_ 1,280 1,380 1,250 + 2.4 -7.3 Beaumont ------------55,627_ 58,774 52,777 + 5.4 -5.4 Corpus Christi..____ 67,564 70,547 51,984 -4.2 10,924 13,443 8,529 +28.1 -18.7 +30.0 89,114 93,307 76,876 +15.9 -4.5 Corsicana ------------7,402 7,573 5,840 + 26.7 -2.3 Other cash ----------------------­ Other assets -------------------­ Dallas -------------------699,336 634,528 545,684 +28.2 + 10.2 ______ l ,486,748 TOTAL ASSETS _____1,490,294 1,338,547 + 11.1 -0.2 El Paso ---------------­79,546 81,172 56,351 +41.2 -2.0 Fort Worth --------209,835 218,050 192,011 + 9.3 -3.8 LIABILITIES Galveston ___________ 50,697 58,571 40,865 + 24.1 -13.5 Federal Reserve notes_____ 589,007 590,223 566,231 + 4.0 -0.2 Houston -------------­624,524 666,873 564,337 +lo.7 -6.4 Deposits 802,422 802,922 696,684 +15.2 -0.1 ----------------------------Laredo -----------------­15,495 14,858 12,223 + 26.8 + 4.3 Other liabilities --------------73,769 76,191 58,550 +26.0 -3.2 38,559 39,310 28,667 1.9 Lubbock --------------·-· +34.5 ­Port Arthur ________ 25,855 25,899 23,058 + 12.1 -0.2 TOTAL LIABILITIES.. _l,465,198 1,469,336 1,321,465 + lo.9 -0.3 San Angelo ----------23,929 21,026 15,374 +55.6 +13.8 in____________ 6,570 6,306 San Antonio _______ 201,146 205,436 147,452 +36.4 -2.1 Capital paid 5,656 +16.2 + 4.2 Texarkanat ---------­20,489 21,185 20,391 + 0.9 -3.3 Surplus ------------------------11,977 11,977 7,332 + 63.4 Other capital accounts__ 3,003 2,675 4,094 -26.7 +12.3 Tyler --------------------31,021 29,853 23,627 +31.3 + 3.9 Waco -------------------37,193 43,472 26,063 +42.7 -14.4 TOTAL LIABILITIES Wichita Falls ------37,912 43,440 29,126 +30.2 -12.7 AND CAPITAL AC­COUNTS -------------------1,486,748 1,490,294 1,338,547 + 11.1 -0.2 *Debits to deposit accounts except interbank accounts tlncludes two banks in Arkansas, Eighth District. · and Waco, each of which showed increases of more than 40%. San Angelo registered the largest percentage gain, the increase being 55.6%. Compared with March this year, bank debits were somewhat smaller during April, although six reporting cities showed increases ranging up to 13.9%. Life Insurance Sales (Since the sales of life insurance are relatively sensitive to the changes in consumer income, they may be used as a measure of the consumer market.) According to data compiled by the Life Insurance Agency Management Association, sales of ordinary life insurance in Texas increased 9% during April and were almost twice as large as in April, 1945. Compared with a year earlier the percentage increase in Texas was substantially above that for the rest of the nation. Sales in Texas during April, 1946, amounted to $69,008,000 as compared with $35,208,000 in April, 1945. ORDINARY LIFE INSURANCE SALES (in thousands of dollars) Source: Life Insurance Agency Management Association Percent change Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. Mar. Apr. from from Place 1946 1946 1945 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Texas -········-·--· 69,008 63,283 35,208 +96.0 + 9.0 United States.. 1,473,519 1,356,821 842,011 +75.0 + 8.5 ·---------­ Failures (The number of failures and the amount of liabilities vary In­versely with the prosperity of business and reflect in simple and direct manner what is happening to business.) According to information supplied by Dun and Brad­street, there were no business failures in Texas during April. This is the third consecutive month in which no failures have been reported, and for the year to date only one failure has been reported. Credits and Collections (Expansion of retail sales depends to a considerable degree upon the expansion of credit, but the soundness of the expansion is related to the soundness of the extension of credit. Changes in the ratios of credit sales to total sales and collections to outstanding accounts indicate what is happening to this phase of business activity.) During April total sales of 61 department and apparel stores in Texas were almost evenly divided between cash and credit sales. The ratio of credit sales to total net sales during April was substantially larger than during the same month last year. The larger ratio of credit sales during April occurred in all parts of the State, although it was highest in Dallas where the ratio amounted to 53.1 %. The ratio of collections to out­standing accounts, which had risen to 70.6% in March, declined to 68.6% in April as compared with 66.0% in April, 1945. The ratio of credit salaries to credit sales continued to decline, amounting to 1.0% in April. (The foregoing analysis of financial conditions in Texas was written by Dr. W. Nelson Peach, Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at The Uni­versity of Texas.) LABOR Employment (Employment statistics are among the most important indicators of Texas business and economic activity. The Bureau's statistics of manufacturing employment comprise production and related workers, whereas all employees are included in nonmanufacturinS' workers. Proprietors, officers of corporations, and other principal executives are excluded from both series.) Employment in Texas turned upward in April. The aggregate number of wage earners employed by 1,857 reporting firms rose 2.9%; that is, from 130,517 em­ployed in March, 1946, to 134,323 in April. The reports represented in these totals were collected by the Bureau of Business Research in co-operation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, and the percentage changes were computed for identical establishments reporting for the two months. This reversal of the downward movement of Texas employment since December of last year suggests that Texas employment has begun to recover from the impact of reconversion. The favorable employment statistics for Texas in April parallel the national employment sit­uation. Plagued by strikes in major industries for the past five months, nationwide civilian employment has moved ahead slowly, rising 3.0% between March and April. It is also interesting to note that Texas employ­ment went up in some fields closely allied with major industries now on strike. Excluding eight shipbuilding establishments that ex­perienced an 81.5% drop in employment from April, 1945, the over-all change in employment in 1,857 estab­lishments was an increase of 3.6%. This improvement, though still slight, was better than the 0.5% rise for the March, 1945-to-March, 1946, comparison. It would aiso seem to indicate a definite upturn for the longer period. The total number of persons working in Texas manu­facturing establishments during March was 296,000, as compared with 294,000 in February and 402,100 in March, 1945. These monthly estimates were prepared by the Bureau of Business Research in co-operation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. The gain for the month was an even 1.0%; for the 12-month comparison employment in manufac­turing fell 26.2%. The largest employers df manufacturing labor in the State during March of this year were the food products and petroleum and coal products industries with 56,000 and 37,800 workers, respectively. Following these two industries as job-providers were companies producing machinery (except electrical) with 29,300 workers, lum­ber and timber basic products with 26,500 workers, apparel and finished textile products with 22,200 work­ers, and transportation equipment (except automobiles) with 21,800 workers. TEXAS BUSINESS REVIEW PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF EMPLOYMENT AND PAY ROLLS IN IDENTICAL ESTABLISHMENTS Source: Bureau of Business Research in co-operation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor EMPLOYMENT PAY ROLLS Number N umber of wage earners • Percent change Amount (weekly) Percent change Industrial group of establish­ments -----­Apr. 1946 Apr. Mar. 1946 1946 from Apr. 1945 Apr. 1946 from Mar. 1946 Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1946 from Apr. 1945 Apr. 1946 from Mar. 1946 ALL ESTABLISHMENTS ---------­ 1,857 134,323 130,517 + 3.6t + 2.9 $5,665,349 $5,436,458 + l.7t + 4.2 = MANUFACTURING Food products ------­-----------­­Textiles --------------­---­ 187 19 9,875 5,020 9,791 4,909 -5.9 + 12.1 + + 0.9 2.3 350,114 168,686 355,256 162,798 -5.5 + 31.1 1.4 + 3.6 Apparel -----------------­Finished lumber products -----­Forest products ----------------­Paper products -----­-­---­Printing and publishing --­----------­Commercial products -----------­Stone and clay products ---------­Iron and steel products ------------------­Nonferrous metal products -­-­Machinery (except electrical) _ _ 36 32 20 10 38 136 35 38 13 50 3,128 2,562 2,435 1,533 1.427 32,413 3,210 4,046 3,616 9,990 3,204 2,564 2,473 1,581 1,395 32,180 3,081 3,814 3,576 9,025 -13.8 + 8.6 + 7.0 + 13.7 + 23.3 + 2.6 + 61.2 -19.1 -0.4 -36.4 2.4 0.1 1.5 3.0 + 2.3 + 0.7 + 4.2 + 6.1 + 1.1 + 10.7 78,738 85,250 74,969 62,835 72,451 1,760,522 114,929 172,180 180,122 504,653 77,866 84,905 75,315 62,674 70,345 1,789,209 106,801 160,712 177,544 411,686 -10.8 + 17.8 + 18.1 + 38.1 + 34.6 -3.2 + 59.3 -21.4 -6.8 -35.9 + 1.1 + 0.4 0.5 + 0.3 + 3.0 1.6 + 7.6 + 7.1 + 1.5 + 22.6 Other manufacturing ---------­ 22 9,331 8,356 -77.2 + 11.7 398,439 325,827 -82.6 + 22.3 NONMANUFACTURING Crude petroleum production ---­­Dyeing and cleaning -----­--­Hotels ---------------­--­Insurance -----­----­-------­ 60 10 18 128 5,540 147 1,822 2,787 5,493 147 1,841 2,643 + 12.9 + 10.2 + 2.5 + 20.8 + + 0.9 0.0 1.0 5.4 287,731 5,069 42,250 123,406 289,996 4,950 42,318 114,587 + 7.5 + 27.6 + 10.7 + 28.2 0.8 + 2.4 0.2 + 7.7 Laundri.., ---­-------­Public utilities -----------· Quar ryinir Retail trade ------------­---­Wholesale trade ---------­-­ 14 218 14 547 179 792 6,380 1,519 20,298 4,523 758 6,304 1,496 19,344 4,459 -6.4 + 26.3 + 3.3 + 15.3 + 11.8 + + + + + 4.5 1.2 1.5 4.9 1.4 17,272 286,334 72,506 565,536 184,534 16,622 261,232 70,095 530,001 178,872 -3.5 + 34.5 -3.3 + 31.6 + 19.2 + 3.9 + 9.6 + 3.4 + 6.7 + 3.2 Other n~onmanufacturing 33 1,929 2,083 + 55.3 7.4 56,723 66,847 + 32.4 -15.1 •Does not include proprietors, firm members, officers of corporations, or other principal executives. Manufacturing employment comprises production a.nd related workers; nonmanufacturing employment comprises all employees. tExcluding eight aircraft-shipbuilding establishments that declined 81.5% in employment and 85.3% in pay rolls from April, 1945. The most significant change in the number of workers ESTIMATED CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE employed between February and March of this year was the addition of 5,800 by the iron and steel products Source: United States Employment Service group. The outstanding decrease was the dropping of Percent change 1,100 workers by the food products industries. In the 12 months from March, 1945, to March, 1946, Apr. 1946 Apr.1946 there have been widespread shifts in manufacturing em­Apr. Mar. Apr. from from Area 1946 1946 1945 Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 ployment in Texas. Last year the number one industry of the State was the manufacture of transportation Abilene ---------------------20,872 20,660 120,600 -82.7 + 1.0 equipment, principally aircraft and ships; this industry Amarillo 27,655 27,000 28,943 4.5 + 2.4 alone employed 109,100 workers. It was followed in Austin ---------------------45,690 46,506 42,100 + 8.5 -1.8 size by the food products industries (59,000 workers), Beaumont-Port Ar­thur-Orange --------93,655 92,706 95,076 1.5 + 1.0 petroleum and coal products industries (39,300 work­ Brownsville --------------18,054 17,820 11,535 + 56.5 +u ers) , machinery manufacturing ( 36,300 workers), and Corpus Christi 54,800 54,000 60,000 8.7 +1.5 the iron and steel products industries (with 30,300 work­ Dallas ------------------------207,932 199,600 195,200 + 6.5 + u ers). From every standpoint the 80.0% fall in the El Paso --------------------48,000 47,600 46,925 + 2.3 + 0.8 number of persons working for companies turning out Fort Worth 123,900 120,933 136,140 9.0 + 2.5 ---------.-­ transportation equipment is the most important change. Galveston-Texas Approximately 87,300 workers left this industry in the City -------------------·--52,600 52,133 56,202 6.4 + 0.9 period from March, 1945, to March, 1946. The next Houston-Baytown --309,235 307,304 310,145 0.3 + 0.6 Longview --------------28,400 27,616 52,767 -46.2 + 2.8 largest decrease for the 12·month interval was the loss Lubbock -------------------30,979 30,849 21,172 + 46.3 + 0.4 of 13,900 workers by the iron and steel products indus­ San Antonio ------------177,404 174,200 126,519 + 40.2 + 1.8 tries. Other changes that would be significant in more 0.0 Texarkana -------------51,500 51,520 21,900 + 135.2 stable times appear nominal in comparison with these Waco ---------------------52,000 51,500 47,610 + 9.2 + 1.0 enormous shifts. Wichita Falls 34,869 34,561 24,035 + 45.1 + 0.9 Estimates of changes in the civilian labor force in 19 Total ---------------------1,377,545 1,356,508 1,396,869 -1.4 +u urban areas of the State made by the United States Em­ployment Service show a 1.6% rise between March and TEXAS BUSINESS REVIEW ESTIMATES OF TOTAL MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT IN TEXAS (in thousands) Source: Bureau of Business Research in cowoperation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U . S. Department of Labor Percent change Mar. 1946 Mar. 1946 from from Industrial group Mar. 1946 Feb. 1946 Mar. 1945 Mar.1945 Feb. 1946 ALL MANUFACTURING 296.9 294.0 402.1 -26.2 + 1.0 Iron and steel and their products---------------------------------------------------------------------····---------16.4 10.6 30.3 -45.9 +54.7 Machinery, except electrical ------------------------------·-·--····--·-····-·--···-···-·---···-------------------29.3 29.1 36.3 -19.3 + 0.7 Transportation equipment, except autos.......... ·--------··-------·-----------------------------------------------21.8 24.7 109.1 -80.0 -11.7 Nonferrous metals and their products---------------------··-···-·-·--···--------------------------------------·-·· 9.0 9.6 10.0 -10.0 -6.3 Lumber and timber basic products____________________·-----------···-·-··-------------····--····-·-···--·······-·-····--· 26.5 26.3 23.4 +13.2 + 0.8 Furniture and finished lumber products..... -..-------------------------------------······-······-·-····----11.1 11.0 10.1 + 9.9 + 0.9 Stone, clay, and glass products------------------------·-·-·--·----------------------------------------------····-··-·--·· 9.4 9.0 7.0 +au +·U Textile mill products and other fiber manufactures ______·----------------···--·--------------------------· 8.5 8.4 7.8 + 9.0 + 1.2 Apparel and other finished textile products·-··-----------------------------------------------------------------·· 22.2 21.4 22.3 -0.4 + 3.7 57.1 59.0 -5.1 -1.9 Food --------------------------------------------------------------------···-·--·----·-······----·-···-···--·---·----------------········------56.0 Paper and aJlied products_____···-··-········------------------·-····----···-------------------------····-·····--···--····----· 3.9 3.8 3.6 + 8.3 + 2.6 Printing, publishing, and allied industries....-------------------------------------------····-----------------·-17 .1 16.6 14.6 +17.1 + 3.0 Chemicals and allied products______··-·------·-----··-···-··-------------------------------------------·-······------18.1 18.7 20.8 -13:0 -3.2 Products of petroleum and coaL.............. -------------------------------------------------------····--·-·-···· 37.8 37.7 39.3 -3.8 + 0.3 MisceJlaneous industries -------------------------·-------------·-··------····------------·-····---·-·· 3. 7 3.7 3.6 + 6.7 0.0 6.3 5.0 + 22.0 -3.2 All other ··----------·---·······-·······-··-·--····-------·-········-----------------------------·-·····-··-··-· 6.1 April, 1946. Austin was the only city to show a decrease Pay Rolls (1.8% ) in its labor force for this period, although no (Pay roll figures are generally recognized as significant indicators change was reported for Texarkana. The civilian labor of income and purchasing power by both economists and businessmen. Emphasis on the maintenance of purchasing power as a goal for the force in the 19 areas covered by the estimates declined country's postwar economy gives particular importance to theae fisurea 1.4'/o from April, 1945, to April, 1946, with gains and at this time.) losses fairly evenly distributed among the major cities The rise of 4.2% in pay rolls in April over March of the State. for the 1,857 establishments reporting to the Bureau of HOURS AND EARNINGS Source: Bureau of Business Research in co-operation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U . S. Department of Labor Average weekly hours Average hourly earnings (in cents) Average weekly earnings (in dollars) Percent change April 1946 from April 1946 Industrial group Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Apr. 1946 Weekly hours Hourly earnings Weekly earnInge MANUFACTURING Food products -----------------------------­ 46.9 47.3 71.2 67.0 32.93 31.90 0.8 + 6.3 + 3.2 Textiles ·····-··-··-··---····-----·-----------·-·· 43.0 44.2 79.8 67.6 34.19 29.79 2.7 + 18.0 + 14.8 Apparel ----------------­--------­Finished lumber products_________ Forest' products -------------------------­ 39.0 44.1 45.4 38.4 45.3 47.7 65.0 76.6 74.3 61.6 66.8 61.8 26.36 33.69 33.79 23.73 30.13 29.63 + 1.6 2.6 4.8 + + + 5.6 14.7 20.2 + 6.9 + 11.8 + 14.4 Paper products -------------------------­--­ 45.6 42.8 89.3 78.5 40.65 33.47 + 6.6 + 13.8 + 21.6 Printing and publishing ··--------------­Commercial products ---------------------------­ 43 .3 45.3 42.6 50.8 116.3 108.8 105.9 99.2 49.81 48.40 44.87 49.38 + 1.6 -10.8 + + 9.8 9.7 + - 11.0 2.0 Stone and clay products--·········--···-----­ 42 .2 47.0 81.5 71.3 34.21 33.69 -10.2 + 14.3 + 1.6 Iron and steel products--··········-----­-Nonferrous metal products_________ ___ _______ Machinery (except electrical) 44.2 42.8 45.4 48 .8 47.9 48.9 96.6 116.8 105.3 89.0 100.9 100.3 42.67 49 .73 47.59 36.74 48.22 49 .16 -9.4 -10.6 -7.2 + + + 8.5 16.8 6.0 + + - 16.1 3.1 3.2 Other manufacturing ----··-------------··------­ 36.4 48.8 -117.5 114.6 42.77 55.92 -25.4 + 2.6 - 23.5 NONMANUFACTUIUNG Crude petroleum p:roduction -------------­Dyeing and cleaning_______ __________ Hotels ----------------------­---------­--------­Laundries ----------­---------------------------­ 40.8 50.4 45.1 48.6 45.7 44.9 36.7 46.7 127.9 70.8 38.5 42.4 119.2 58.7 46.6 46 .1 52 .18 35.68 17.36 20.61 54.47 26.36 16.74 20.61 -10.7 + 12.2 + 22.9 + 6.3 + 7.3 + 20.6 -16.6 -6.0 -4.2 + 36.4 + 3.7 0.0 Public utilit ies ------·---­------------------------­Quarrying -------------------------------------------­ 46:3 41.7 46.3 48.7 98.9 114.4 94.4 100.9 45.79 47.70 43.71 49 .14 0.0 4.4 + + 4.8 13.4 + 4.8 2.9 Retail trade ----------------­---------------------­Wholesale trade ---------·-····--------·· Other nonmanufacturing --------------­ 42.3 46.0 36.1 41.5 46.9 45.0 71.1 86.0 69.0 62.5 78.3 67.9 30.08 39.66 24.91 25.94 36.72 30.66 + 1.9 1.9 -19.8 + + + 13.8 9.8 1.6 + + - 16.0 7.7 20.1 Business Research was somewhat greater than the 2.9% increase in employment. If the eight aircraft and ship­building establishments which suffered an 85.3 % de­crease in pay rolls from April, 1945, to April, 1946, are excluded from the comparison, total pay rolls in Texas last month were 1.7% higher than in the same month a year ago. In April of this year as in March the decreases in manufacturing pay rolls (exclusive of aircraft and ship­building) were more than offset by increases in manu­facturing pay rolls both for the month and the 12-month interval. Ten of the 13 manufacturing groups showed higher pay rolls in March than in April, 1946, while only six groups had larger pay rolls in April this year than in the same month a year earlier. In the nonmanu­facturing category, on the other hand, 7 out of 10 groups reported larger pay rolls for the month, and eight groups registered increases in the April-to-April comparison. Hours and Earnings (Statistics on hours and earnings show clearly the effects of the shift of the State's economy and the general upward move­ment of wages since V-J Day. Average hourly earnings are com­puted by dividinir the total number of man-hours worked in re­porting establishments into total pay rolls.) The average hours worked per week in Texas manufac­turing during April was approximately 44 hours, as com­pared with over 47 hours in the same month of 1945. Only 3 of the 13 industrial groups-apparel, paper products, and printing and publishing-in the manufac­turing category worked longer hours in April, 1946, than a year earlier. The tendency toward a shorter work week was less noticeable in the nonmanufacturing category. Hours were up for the 12-month period for dyeing and clean­ing establishments (12.2%), hotels (22.9% ), laundries (6.3% ), and retail trade (1.9% ). No change was re­ported in the hours worked by public utilities. Without exception every major industrial group in the manufacturing classification showed an increase in hourly earnings and all but two (commercial products and ma­ chinery-except electrical) reported a rise in weekly earnings. Hotels and laundries indicated decreases of 15.6% and 6.0% in average hourly earnings between April, 1945, and April, 1946; all other nonmanufactur­ ing groups registered increases. Weekly earnings were down in crude petroleum production, quarrying, and other nonmanufacturing. There was no change in the weekly earnings of laundry workers. Other nonmanufac­ turing groups experienced a rise in weekly earnings. Man-hours (The reports which the Bureau receives on employment include every employee who worked any part of the week. This means that changes in the number of employees in an industry do not always measure the changes in the volume of output. Changes in the number of man-hours worked, however, are closely associated with the rate of manufacturing activity, and may be used as a measure of the volume of production.) A hopeful sign on the Texas business horizon in April was the upturn in the man-hours worked in manufactur­ing establishments. The increase for April over March was small (0.2% ) , but it was a movement in the right direction and was generally shared by the several lines of manufacturing. Only 3 of the 13 major industrial groups failed to show a rise in man-hours worked in April. They were the groups engaged in the manufac­ture of food products (down 5.1 % ) , commercial products (down 4.4 % ) , and stone and clay products (down 0.1 % ) . The biggest monthly increase (10.0%) was made in machinery manufacturing. The slump in industrial production, which accom­panied the end of the war, is evidenced in the 41.3% drop in man-hours worked in Texas manufacturing plants from April, 1945, to April, 1946. Gains and losses were generally large, with losses occurring in seven, and gains in six groups. Among the food products industries, the only man­hour gains for the month and year were in the manufac­ture of ice and ice-cream. Man-hours worked in car­bonated beverage plants were up for the month, but down in the April-to-April comparison. All other food products industries reported declines in the number of man-hours. Furniture factories in Texas worked fewer man-hours in April than in March, but more man-hours than in April, 1945. Gains and losses in man-hours worked in planing and saw mills canceled out into small increases for the month and year. The stone and clay products, the paper products, and the printing and publishing in­dustries turned in large increases in man-hours over April of last year, but showed little change from March to April of this year. Every branch of the machinery manufacturing indus­try in Texas showed a larger number of man-hours for April than for March, but a much smaller number of man-hours for April, 1946, than for April, 1945. MAN-HOURS WORKED IN IDENTICAL MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS Source: Bureau of Business Resear ch in co~operation wit h the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. S. Department of Labor Number Percent change of establish­ Apr. 1946 from Apr. 1946 from Industrial group ments Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 AL L MANUFACTURING ............ 508 -41.3 -0.2 Food products .................................... 123 -15.7 -5.1 Textiles ··············································­ 15 + 9.0 -1.1 Apparel ···························-················· 24 -15.4 + 0.9 F inished lumber products_.............. 28 + 5.5 + 1.6 Forest products ············-·················· 17 + u +M Paper products .................................. 10 +22.1 + 0.1 Printing and publishing.................. 31 +25.6 + 3.0 Commercial products ··-·-··········-·­122 -H.O -H Stone and clay products.......... ·-····· 32 + n.& -0.1 Iron and steel ·products·-················· 36 -26.3 + 5.2 Nonferrous metal products.............. 12 -15.3 + 0.6 Machinery (except electrical) ........ 40 -43.5 + lo.o Other manufacturing ·········--····-··· 18 -82.9 + lo.4 Unemployment (Data on the payment of unemployment benefits provide a rou1h m easure of unemployment in Texas. Only establishments emplcry­ing 8 or more workers for 20 or more weeks per year are covered in the series, but it is the most inclusive current information on unemployment for the State. Veteran's claim actions and dishurae­menta are less inclusive, but throw llsht on the important prob­lem of veteran re-employment. The number of placements reported by the United States Employment Service indicates the relationship of the supply of and demand for jobs in various parts of the State.) Unemployment benefit payments in Texas dropped back sharply in April to $1,378,202 from a high of $1,628,817 in February and $1,931,968 in March. Con­tributions to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the month totaled $1,906,435, once more exceeding disburse­ments by a substantial figure. This situation is interest­ing in view of the facts that industrial pay rolls in Texas dropped approximately $100,000,000 after V-E Day and lower tax rates have been awarded to 68% of the 20,634 covered employers with a small labor turnover. An offsetting factor was the addition of 1,276 employer-contributors thus far this year. The balance in the Unemployment Trust Fund on April 30 ($154,404,434) was up slightly over the total at the end of March. Disbursements to veterans rose almost 75% in April to a total of $9,143,206 for the month. To date veterans' disbursements in Texas have amounted to $31,394,842, of which $23,017,987 has been made in the first four months of this year. These sums completely dwarf the amounts paid out for regular unemployment compen­sation. Placements in employment by the United States Em­ployment Service were 6.4% greater in April than in March for 17 Texas cities. Of the cities covered in the tabulation only four-Brownsville, Dallas, El Paso, and Fort Worth-reported fewer placements last month than in the previous month. Placements for April, 1946, however, were 38.1 % fewer than in April, 1945, in the same cities. Nevertheless, Abilene, Austin, Corpus Christi, Longview, Lubbock, and Texarkana placements were greater this month than in the same month a year ago. The present situation has its brighter side. The United States Employment Service predicts a drop in unemploy­ment for the entire State, as more jobs open up. The Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission also points out that some 26,000 claimants have voluntarily removed themselves from the rolls of those claiming benefits, presumably because they have obtained jobs. The regional C. E. D. goal of a 20 to 25% increase in employment in private enterprise and a 35% increase in production have already been exceeded. Construction, however, is a critical problem and material shortages have retarded the absorption of unemployed workers into the construction industry. GOVERNMENT Federal Finance (Federal collections of income, pay roll, and excise taxes vary directly with the level of business prosperity. Durins the war period federal taxation has likewise become an important determi­nant of seneral business activity.) Federal internal revenue collections in Texas during April totaled $72,288,435, a decline of 5.4% from the total collected in April of last year. Collections in the First (or South Texas) District were up 9.3% over 1945 figures, hut not enough to affect the 30.3% decrease in collections in the Second (or North Texas) district. For the first ten months of the current fiscal year (July 1, 1945-April 30, 1946) the federal government collected $912,569,123 in Texas, or 4.9% less than in the same 10 months of the fiscal year 194~6. First District collections were down 9.6%, and Second District figures were up 1.2%. April saw the return of the federal government to a current deficit, after three months operation in the black. The federal deficit for the first ten months of the present fiscal period aggregated $20,000,000,000, PLACEMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT Source : United States Employment Service Percent change Area Apr. 1946 Mar. 1946 Apr. 1945 Apr. 1946 Apr. 194'6 from from Apr. 1945 Mar. 1946 Abilene -------------------------­ 682 621 505 +35.0 + 9.8 Amarillo -----------------------­ 738 682 1,100 -32.9 + 8.2 Austin -------------­-------------­ 1,047 936 1,041 + 0.6 +11.9 Beaumont-Port Arthur- Orange -----------------.----­ 1,792 1,746 3,776 -52.5 + 2.6 Brownsville ·------------------­ "148 191 1,264 -88.8 -22.5 Corpus Christi ------------­ 1,008 561 814 +23.8 + 79.5 Dallas ----------­---------------­ 4,153 4,319 6,922 -40.0 -3.8 El Paso ---------------------------­ 531 619 1,047 -49.3 -14.2 Fort Worth ---------­---------­ 2,907 3,000 4,513 -35.6 -3.1 Galveston-Texas City.... 1,641 1,582 2,077 -21.0 + 3.7 Houston-Baytown -------­ 4,488 3,946 10,457 -57.1 +13.7 Longview ------------------------­ 556 512 280 +98.6 + 8.6 Lubbock -----------------------­ 788 607 461 + 10.9 +29.8 San Antonio ----·-----------­ 2,016 2,003 3,010 -33.0 + 0.6 Texarkana --·----­-----------­ 911 736 859 + ·6.1 +23.8 Waco -------------------------------­ 725 601 859 - 15.6 +20.6 Wichita Falls -------------­ 452 43 8 708 -36.2 + 3.2 Total --------------------------­ 24,583 23,100 39,693 -38.1 + 6.4 FEDERAL INTERNAL REVENUE COLLECTIONS Source: Office of the Collector, Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Department April July 1-April 30 Percent Percent District 1946 1945 change 1945-46 1944-45 chani,re TEXAS ··-······-···-····-····-····-··--·---·--$72,288,435 $76,395,654 -5.4 $912,569,123 $959,695,936 -4.9 First District ·······--···-·---··---------45,825,785 41,923,433 + 9.3 489,761,216 541,997,412 -9.6 Second District ···-·········-· 26,462,650 $34,4 72,221 -30.3 422,807,907 417,698,524 + 1.2 as compared with $44,000,000,000 for the comparable period of 1944-45. State Finance (Statistics on State finance are closely connect~ with chan.ges in the level of business activity. State occupation, production., use, and sales taxes and license fees vary directly with changing hualnesa conditions.) According to the latest monthly rep?rt of the S~ate Comptroller of Public Accounts, Apnl cash receipts totaled $33, 717 ,629, raising the total receipts for the first eight months of the current fiscal . year to ~226,364,85?. This figure represents an 18.2% mcrease m the States cash receipts over the corresponding 1944-45 fiscal period. In dollar terms the greatest increases in receipts items this year over last came in the ad valorem, inheritan?e, and poll taxes, and in the use and sales taxes. Sig­nificant decreases occurred in receipts from occupation, gross receipts, and production taxes, and from contribu­tions and aid. Principal factors in these decreases were the declines in receipts from taxes on crude petroleum production and unemployment compensation taxes. Non­revenue receipts thus far this fiscal year were up 52.2%. One unusual feature of the State financial picture is the growth of State income from franchise taxes. This increase can be attributed to the flurry of activity in chartering new corporations, increasing the capitaliza­tion of old ones, and paying taxes on accumulated sur­plus and undivided profits. On April 30 of this year, the State's cash balance was $100,731,800, a gain of approximately $2,500,000 during the month. The balance of $29,928,109 on the same date in the general revenue fund hit an all-time high. In November, 1942, the general revenue fund showed a deficit of $34,244,864. The size of the changes in the State's financial picture indicates their significance. CASH RECEIPTS OF STATE COMPTROLLER Source : State Comptroller of Public Accounts September 1-April 30 Item Apr. 1946 1946-46 1944-46 P ercent change TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS -·-----·--$33. 717.629 $226.364,856 $191,488,484 +18.2 TOTAL REVENUE RECEIPTS --·------30,746,647 200,212,289 174,305,965 + 14.9 Ad valorem, inheritan ce, and poll t u es--.----··­ 1,693,286 28,631,980 20.139,935 +42.2 Occupation, gross re­ ceipts, and production taxes -----------------­ 6,026,687 38,774,707 40,073,384 -3.2 Use a nd sales tax_________ 10,100,414 76,619,368 60,732,010 +26.2 License fees a nd m ainte-­ nance taxes ----­ 1,629,220 6,468,708 6,622,701 + 17.l I n come from public lands a nd buildings --­ 681,702 9,931,531 7,771,491 +27.8 I nterest ---­---­ 986.870 5,958,613 6,976,608 -0.3 Miscellaneous revenues -8,109,211 11,427,349 7,711,022 +48.2 Contr ibutions and aid.. _ 6,624,641 89,689,789 41,051,484 -3.3 N ON R EVENUE R ECEIPTS --------­ 2,970,982 26,162,667 17,182,630 + 62.2 PRICES Wholesale Prices (Changes in the prices of commodities are of fundamental Im· portance to businessmen, since the level of prices bas an Important effect on profits. The Index of wholesale price• compiled by t ... United States Bureau of Labor Stati1tica la the moet comprehensive measure of price changes publlahed In the United States.) The national level of wholesale prices continued to rise in March. The index of wholesale prices compiled by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics stood at 108.9 in March, 1946, compared with 107.7 a month earlier. This index is based on 889 price series, and is the most comprehensive measure available of the changes in the level of all commodities at wholesale. The base of the index is 1926, which means that prices now aver· age 8.9% above the level of that year. There has been a wide variation in the changes in prices of different groups of commodities; the price of farm products in March, 1946, was 133.4 in relation to 1926, while the average of all commodities other than farm products was 103.4. Building materials were 124.9, with lumber 167.6, but cement prices were only 102.3% of 1926. In the last year all commodity groups have been ad· vancing, although not at the same rate. The index of all commodities increased 3.4% over March, 1945, but farm products increased 4.9% and all other commodi· ties 3.0%. Building materials increased more than any other group, with a 6.7% increase for the group and and 8.6% increase for lumber. INDEXES OF WHOLES.ALE PRICES (1926= 100) Source: Bureau of Labor Sta tistics, U. S. Department of Labor Percent chan1re Group Mar. 1946 F eb. 19'46 Mar. 1946 Mar. 1946 Kar. 19'6 from from Mar. 1946 Feb. 1946 ALL COMMODITIES -·-··· 108.9 107.7 106.3 +u + 1.1 F arm products ··-····-·-··--··­--­ 133.4 130.8 127.2 +u + 2.0 F oods ·--·-······-·----·--···-­·---··-·--­10 9. 4 107.8 104.6 +u + u Hides and leather products 119.8 119.6 117.8 + 1.7 + 0.2 Textile products -·---··------­-­-104. 7 102.2 99.7 + 6.0 +u Buildin g materials -----­-­124.9 120.9 117.1 + 6.7 +s.s Cement --·-···---·--------­102.3 101.6 99.4 + 2.9 + 0.8 Lumber -----·--------------·-­167.6 160.1 164.3 + 8.6 +u All commodities other t han farm products --··-·----­103.4 102.6 100.4 + 3.0 + 0.9 All commodities oth er tha n farm products and foods 102.2 101.3 99.2 + 3.0 + 0.9 Consumers' Prices (All income figures must he used In connection with a m...unf of changes in consumers' prices, since tile purchulq po,,.,. e income is more significant than the &&"gre&"ate amount ID clollan; The increasing cost of llvin&", u measured by Indexes of CODS-• prices, is of vital importance to all hualneaamen and conaumwa.) The index of consumers' prices for moderate-income families in large cities was 130.2 for all cities on March 15, 1946. The base of this index number is the five·year average 1935-39, which means that consumers' prices have risen approximately 30% since the beginning of the war. This index, formerly known as the "cost of living index" measures the average changes in retail prices of selected goods, rents, and services, weighted by quantities bought by families of wage earners and moderate-income workers in large cities in 1934-36. The items priced for the index constituted about 70% of the expenditures of city families whose incomes aver­aged Sl,524 in 1934-36. The index shows only partially the wartime effects of changes in the quality and avail­ability of consumer goods, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that an adjustment of approximately 5% should be made in the index to take these factors into account. The index for Houston, the only Texas city included in the index, stood at 127.6, or 2.6 points below the average for all cities. The greatest increase for Houston prices was in housefurnishings (146.5 in relation to the base period) followed closely by clothing (145.6). The cost of food was 139.6, while rent (109.2) increased much less than the average of all prices. The index for fuel, electricity, and ice (88.7) declined. The miscel­laneous group at 125.5 was not significantly different from the average of all prices. The index for Houston increased 2.2% over March of last year. The greatest increase was in clothing (up 4.7%). The price of food increased 3.6% over March, 1945, housefurnishings increased 1.9%, and miscella­neous items 1.8%. The fuel, electricity, and ice group showed a 2.6% decrease, whereas rent remained almost unchanged. INDEXES OF CONSUMERS' PRICES (1935-1939=100) Source: Bureau o{ Labor Statistics, U. S. Department of Labor Percent change Mar. Feb. Mar. Mar. 1946 Mar. 1946 Group 1946 1946 1945 from from Mar. 1945 Feb. 1946 Houston ALL ITEMS ................ 127.6 126.8 124.8 + 2.2 + 0.6 Food ........................................ 139.6 139.3 134.8 + 3.6 + 0.2 Clothing ---------------------------145.6 140.0 139.1 + 4.7 + 4.0 Rent ---------------------------------109.2 109.4 + 0.2 Fuel, electricity, and ice .... 88.7 88.7 91.1 -2.6 Houaefurniahlngs --------------146.5 145.7 n3.8 + 1.9 + 0.6 Miacell•neowi 125.5 123.3 + 0.3 -----------------------125.1 + 1.8 U. S. Average ALL ITEMS -------------------130.2 129.6 126.8 + 2.7 + 0.5 Directory of Texas Manufacturers The release date of the 1946 Directory has been delayed for reasons beyond the Bureau's control, but the printers promise delivery within the next few weeks. Attention is again called to the fact that the number of copies of the 1946 edition is limited and those desiring to order the Directory should notify the Bureau immediately. Price $2.50, postpaid, invoiced when shipped. TEXAS BUSINESS REVIEW Published monthly by the Bureau of Business Research, College of Business Administration, The University of Texas, Austin 12, Texas Material contained in this publication is not copyrighted and may be reproduced freely. Acknowledgment of source will be appreciated. Entered as second class matter on May 7, 1928, at the post c.ffice at Austin, Texas, under the Act of August 24, 1912. Subscription $1.00 per year. J. Anderson Fitzgerald ............. ______________________________________... Dean STAFF OF THE BUREAU OF BUSINESS RESEARCH Robert W . French J ohn R. S tockton Director Statistician Elsie Watters Elmer H. J ohnson Office Manager Industrial Geographer Clara H. Lewis Helen Woodcock Editorial Assistant Secr etary Marjorie Campbell B.L.S. Representative Business Research Council J. Anderson Fitzgerald John H. Frederick~ (ex officio) Transportation and Industry Banking and Insurance E. Karl McGinnis Robert W. French (ex officio) Business Law and Real E state Everett G. Smith \.. George W. Stocking Marketing Economics Asaistanta Evelyn Balagia Loraine Campbell Doris Coffee Marjorie Kidd Fred Comstock Evalyn Limmer Bettye Decatur Ernest Litzler George DeGraff Nora Dell MasseyNellie Dyer Neal McDonald Peggy Doole Mary McLain Alpha Elam June Perry Mr s. Ada Fenlaw Meta Ann Scott Leroy Geist J ean Swenson Edwin Gell Ila Mae Taylor Mary Grann Camilla Tetley Kenneth Irwirr Donald Tolliver Calvin Jayroe Andrew Vlasman J immy Witt I CONTENTS Highlights of Texas Business -------------------------·---------1 Figures for the Month --------------------------··------------·------2 The Business Situation in Texas --,---------------·-·-----3 Trade Retail Trade ------·---·-··--------------·--··--4 Wholesale Trade ---·------·-------·-------··-------·-7 Production Manufacturing ----------------------------------------------7 Construction --------------------·-------------------------------------··--9 Public Utilities ......... -... -----·-------·----------10 Natural Resources --·-------·-·-·----------·------·-----10 Agriculture Income .............. ·-------------------------------·-·-----·------··-· 11 Prices --·-···---·--··--·--·----------·----------·---·-··-·----·-·· 11 Marketings ..... _ ..................... -..................... ·-·----·-----14. Cotton ··--------··-------------·--···----------··--·-···--···· .. ·--·-··--------15 Local Business Conditions --=-·---·--·----·----------·-12 Finance Bank Credit ... -... -----·----··--------···---.. -·----------16 Bank Debits -------------------·-·-·-----·--..-----------·-16 Failures ---------..---·-·---·-·---------·-------·-17 Life Insurance Sales ··---------·-------··-------·----17 Credits and Collections ·---··--···--------..·---·-·-·-------·-17 Labor Employment .........·---··---·-·-------..------·-----··-----·--· 17 Pay Rolls ····-----········--·-----------·---····--·--··------·-19 Hours and Earnings --·---------·--··----···--·---·-19 Man-hours ---------··---··------·-·-·-.. 20 Unemployment --·-·--·-·----··---·----·-···---·-------·-------20 Government Federal Finance ---------------·-21 State Finance ............ ---·--·-·--------------22 Prices Wholesale Prices -·----·-----------·-·----·---· 22 Consumers' P rices ------------------------------22 ·Barometers of Texas Business ------------·~·------·--···-------24 BAROMETERS OF TEXAS BUSINESS 1NDEX OF MSC FREIGHT CAALOADINGS IN SOUTHWE.SrERN DIST •t)<. :£..,.....4, u,Q,•T¢" P("l(.[N1 INDEX OF CEMENT PRODUCTION IN TEXAS INDEX OF SOUTHERN PINE 'PRODUCTION INDEX OF CRUDE PET OLEUM PRODUCTION IN TE 0''1. ~ i Yt lUM ..,~ · '9• IOO AS """"' "' 11