Expert Survey to Understand and Optimize Part Orientation in Direct Metal Laser Sintering

dc.creatorHoelzle, David
dc.creatorPeng, Hao
dc.creatorGhasri-Khouzani, Morteza
dc.creatorGong, Shan
dc.creatorAttardo, Ross
dc.creatorOstiguy, Pierre
dc.creatorAboud Gatrell, Bernice
dc.creatorBudzinski, Joseph
dc.creatorTomonto, Charles
dc.creatorNeidig, Joel
dc.creatorShankar, M. Ravi
dc.creatorBillo, Richard
dc.creatorGo, David B.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-04T14:00:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-04T14:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe additive manufacturing (AM) process Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) uses a layer-by-layer workflow to build complex architecture metal structures in low-volumes. The primary process failure mechanism is a thermal stress driven thermal distortion that yields out-of-tolerance manufacture or complete process failure. However, DMLS design experts have developed heuristic rules to optimize the part orientation and support structure to reduce the likelihood of failure. We believe that experts innately attempt to minimize the design metrics of support volume (V), support-to-part surface area (A), maximal cross-sectional area of the slicing planes (X), parallelism of part faces with the recoater blade (P), and part height (H); however, it is unclear what relative weighting of each metric the expert uses. This manuscript details an interactive expert survey, the statistical analysis of the survey responses, and the synthesis of an automatic algorithm for part orientation based on survey data. We received responses from 18 experts and 151 total part orientation responses. The median survey respondent had greater than four years of DMLS experience. Our analysis shows that the expert attempts to minimize metric V the most, metric X the second most, and metric H the third most; experts put essentially no weight on metrics A and P. The manuscript concludes with two orientation design studies where the expert survey responses are used in a least squares minimization algorithm to automatically orient the part for DMLS manufacture. As a comparison set, novice users were instructed to orient the parts for best DMLS printing success without using the tool and required multiple attempts to successfully print the test parts. The automatically oriented parts failed on our first iteration of the code. The manuscript concludes with our proposed modifications to the code to improve results.en_US
dc.description.departmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/89962
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Texas at Austinen_US
dc.relation.ispartof2017 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposiumen_US
dc.rights.restrictionOpenen_US
dc.subjectadditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectDMLSen_US
dc.subjectoptimizationen_US
dc.subjectbuild orientationen_US
dc.subjectsupport structureen_US
dc.subjectheuristic learningen_US
dc.subjectexpert surveyen_US
dc.titleExpert Survey to Understand and Optimize Part Orientation in Direct Metal Laser Sinteringen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-120-Hoelzle.pdf
Size:
903.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.64 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: