Time, saecularity, and the first century BCE Roman world

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorRiggsby, Andrew M.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGalinski, Karl
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHaimson Lushkov, Ayelet
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDavies, Penelope
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPasco-Pranger, Molly
dc.creatorHay, Paul Jerome
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T14:41:25Z
dc.date.available2017-07-14T14:41:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2017
dc.date.updated2017-07-14T14:41:25Z
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the practice of historical periodization by Roman thinkers in the first century BCE and demonstrates that this discourse binds many of the intellectual developments of that time. I argue that during the dictatorship of Sulla, the concept of the saeculum (an Etruscan divinatory term) became adapted into a new idea for historical narrativization among the Roman intellectual community. The result of this development was saecularity, a discursive mode that applied periodization to both the past and the future and thus situated present activity within a broader historical arc. The adoption of saecularity affected the progress of intellectual engagement in a variety of sociopolitical topics. Roman moral decline narratives, traditionally focused on the selection of a single turning point, subsequently developed a more sophisticated vocabulary for explaining the changes in Roman habits, and offered a look to the future of social mores. The rising class of Romans with expert knowledge could historicize the development of their chosen field with “technical histories,” tightly focused narratives inflected by saecularity. The customary trope of attempting literary immortality was transformed, through saecularity, into a weapon against one’s rivals and a source of anxiety for poets seeking a stable fame despite shifting popular tastes. Transitions between each saeculum became a model for Romans who sought to explain instability in their own time. Such transitions increased the Roman interest in a new kind of period, the “post-Roman world,” which saecularity helped hypothesize and structure. Simultaneously, the language of saecularity also influenced the ways that the new Roman Principate and the aristocratic community negotiated their relative statuses within Rome at the end of the first century BCE. My dissertation thus demonstrates how many of the sociopolitical preoccupations typical of the Augustan world emerge from a longer tradition of Roman explorations in temporality.
dc.description.departmentClassics
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierdoi:10.15781/T2PZ5222H
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/60430
dc.subjectRome
dc.subjectHistory
dc.subjectLiterature
dc.subjectSulla
dc.subjectAugustus
dc.subjectPeriodization
dc.subjectTime
dc.subjectSaeculum
dc.subjectSaecularity
dc.subjectFirst century BCE
dc.subjectRome first century
dc.subjectHistorical periodization
dc.subjectPost-Roman world
dc.subjectRoman temporality
dc.subject.lcshRome—History--Augustus, 30 B.C.-14 A.D.--Historiography
dc.subject.lcshRome--History--Periodization
dc.subject.lcshRome--Intellectual life--History
dc.subject.lcshRome--Historiography
dc.titleTime, saecularity, and the first century BCE Roman world
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentClassics
thesis.degree.disciplineClassics
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HAY-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
4.45 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations