An activity theory interpretation of university ESL students’ experiences of classroom group work

dc.contributor.advisorSchallert, Diane L.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBlyth, Carl S.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHorwitz, Elaine K.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMaxwell, Madeline M.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMuñoz, Lindaen
dc.creatorHardy, Jacques Wilburnen
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-01T22:43:39Zen
dc.date.available2012-02-01T22:43:39Zen
dc.date.issued2011-12en
dc.date.submittedDecember 2011en
dc.date.updated2012-02-01T22:43:47Zen
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the experiences of university-level ESL students engaged in classroom group projects. Using the lens of Activity Theory (Engeström, 1987, 2001; Leont’ev, 1976) I attempted to discover how students’ expectations and goals concerning small group work were enacted in their group interaction and participation. I conducted a qualitative case study of one class of nine students in a university-level English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Advanced Listening and Speaking class. I observed all classes during a 3-month instructional term, recording students’ small group work. In addition, I conducted interviews with 4 focal student participants and their instructor. I investigated students’ goals and expectations for group work, as well as the dynamic interplay between these factors and the local context as it unfolded in the work and interaction of each group. I also investigated the sources, effects, and interconnections of contradictions that emerged within and between activity systems in which the students engaged. An analysis of students’ interaction and self reports indicated that students’ expectations about the objectives, partners, distribution of tasks, and suitability of artifacts for each group task influenced their task-related and social goals for group activity. As the groups worked, contradictions within current activity systems and between current and past activity systems emerged. These contradictions necessitated the formation of new goals and activities, thereby promoting or limiting opportunities for interaction. Creative forms of L2 interaction, including negotiation, joking, teasing, and discussions of language form, emerged in response to contradictions. However, other contradictions involving the division of labor within the group promoted conflict or constrained interaction.en
dc.description.departmentForeign Language Educationen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.slug2152/ETD-UT-2011-12-4734en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-12-4734en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectESLen
dc.subjectGroup worken
dc.subjectActivity theoryen
dc.titleAn activity theory interpretation of university ESL students’ experiences of classroom group worken
dc.type.genrethesisen
thesis.degree.departmentForeign Language Educationen
thesis.degree.disciplineForeign Language Educationen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HARDY-DISSERTATION.pdf
Size:
1.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.13 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: