An evaluation of the effects of mandatory reporting on students’ likelihood of disclosing sexual violence

dc.contributor.advisorMeston, Cindy M.
dc.creatorSears, Mackenzie Alexis
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T21:00:52Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T21:00:52Z
dc.date.created2021-12
dc.date.issued2021-11-29
dc.date.submittedDecember 2021
dc.date.updated2022-11-08T21:00:54Z
dc.description.abstractIn the United States, employees of federally funded universities are mandated to report knowledge of any nonconsensual sexual experiences (NSEs) to their universities under Title IX. Few studies have assessed students’ opinions or likelihood of disclosing sexual violence to someone at their university under these policies and they returned mixed results. The NSE literature indicates that people with NSE histories are less likely to disclose sexual violence with mandatory reporting (MR) policies in place. Additionally, there are discrepancies in likelihood to disclose even without the presence of MR policy; people who do not identify their NSEs with sexual violence labels (e.g. rape) are less likely to disclose their experience than people who do use those labels. The current study aims to (1) evaluate students’ likelihood of reporting to someone at the university by introducing a manipulation of the presence of MR policies while (2) evaluating how NSE identification rather than NSE history impacts that likelihood. 184 undergraduate students at UT were randomized into two groups, one given language indicating the presence of MR policies and the other given language about confidential reporting. Each student was shown four gender-neutral vignettes, two describing penetrative assault and two non-penetrative assault with alternating professor and student perpetrators. After each vignette, the students were asked how likely they would be to tell a professor at the university about the event if they were the student in the vignette. Students also completed the Non-Consensual Sexual Experiences Inventory to assess NSE identification (NSEI; Kilimnik et al., 2018). Results from a mixed factor repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences in likelihood to disclose between the vignettes (p <0.01), but not between conditions or NSE identification groups (p= 0.44; p=0.71). Though there is concern in the field about the impact of MR policies based on previous NSE literature, these results indicate that MR policies do not decrease disclosure likelihood. Future research should further evaluate this relationship to determine replicability of these results
dc.description.departmentPsychology
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/116580
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/43475
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectTitle IX
dc.subjectMandatory reporting
dc.subjectSexual violence
dc.subjectUndergraduate students
dc.subjectNonconsensual sexual experiences
dc.titleAn evaluation of the effects of mandatory reporting on students’ likelihood of disclosing sexual violence
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SEARS-THESIS-2021.pdf
Size:
390.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
4.45 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: