Evaluation of test methods and specifications for supplementary cementitious materials for concrete

dc.contributor.advisorJuenger, Maria C. G.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFerron, Raissa P.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFolliard, Kevin J.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFowler, David W.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWheat, Harovel G.
dc.creatorKalina, Ryan David
dc.date.submittedMay 2019
dc.description.abstractWith the decrease in availability of Class F fly ash as a result of stricter emission standards imposed on coal combustion in power plants, the concrete industry is taking measures to find new sources of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to be used in concrete that behave similarly to, or better than, Class F fly ash. A problem that is encountered when evaluating SCMs is that test methods and standards designed to evaluate fly ashes and traditional sources of natural pozzolans are inadequate for evaluating new sources of materials, including quarry by-products. The research presented in this dissertation examined several test methods used to qualify natural pozzolans and fly ashes in the US to determine their suitability for assessing new material sources. First, test methods specified by ASTM C618 were compared against results from advanced characterization techniques for material pozzolanicity, including calcium hydroxide (CH) content via thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and the recently developed rapid, relevant, and reliable (R³) method. This was done to determine how whether or not ASTM C618 can effectively screen inert materials. The research also evaluated the use of standardized tests for resistance to alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and their application to natural pozzolans and fly ashes, particularly in the context of SCMs with high alkali contents. The literature suggests that the more rapid test for ASR, ASTM C1567, is ineffective for evaluating the contribution of high-alkali fly ash in controlling ASR expansion, and this research examined the role of alkali solubility on the test results for both high-alkali fly ashes and natural pozzolans. Concerns with the relevance of the ASTM C311 standard method for determining available alkalis were explored by evaluating modifications to the standard available alkali test method that included varying the length of curing and increasing the pH of the reagent solution to better represent conditions in real concrete. The results of the research showed that ASTM C618 does not adequately screen inert materials for use in concrete and fails to test for pozzolanicity. The research also showed that natural pozzolans behave differently than high-alkali fly ashes in standardized tests for ASR in that ASTM C1567 is sufficient in predicting the outcome of ASTM C1293 for natural pozzolans, primarily due to the lower available alkalis of natural pozzolans compared to fly ashes. It was also found that modifying the ASTM C311 standard method for determining available alkalis to better represent realistic conditions is not necessary, since the results of the modifications were not significantly different than the results of the standard method. For several of the materials, the available alkalis determined using the standard method were useful in understanding the role of alkalis in SCMs when assessing their performance in ASR testing
dc.description.departmentCivil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering
dc.subjectSupplementary cementitious materials
dc.subjectNatural pozzolans
dc.titleEvaluation of test methods and specifications for supplementary cementitious materials for concrete
thesis.degree.departmentCivil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
1.82 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
4.45 KB
Plain Text
No Thumbnail Available
1.84 KB
Plain Text