Arbitrating “Arbitrability”

dc.creatorRau, Alan S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-16T20:32:54Z
dc.date.available2016-09-16T20:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.description“The respective roles of courts and arbitral tribunals is, in one form or another, the foundational, primal question around which our whole law of arbitration revolves. True, there is nothing here that hasn’t been said often before (and often enough–although that can hardly be thought to make things any better–by me). The outlines should be abundantly familiar by now. But the endless downpour of cases, and the overgrowth of commentary (inevitable after heavy rains) suggest that it may still be necessary to clear away some brush. It is somewhat easier for me to justify going over all this ground again in this brief exercise, when I bear in mind Johnson’s admonition that ‘men more frequently require to be reminded than informed.’” – Rau, Introduction paragraph.en_US
dc.description.departmentThe Kay Bailey Hutchison Center for Energy, Law, and Businessen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.15781/T2M32NB56
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/40906
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKBH Energy Center Research and Publicationsen_US
dc.rights.restrictionOpenen_US
dc.subjectarbitrationen_US
dc.subjectcourtsen_US
dc.subjecttribunalsen_US
dc.titleArbitrating “Arbitrability”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2013_01_01_Arbitrating_Arbitrability.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.66 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: