The Meaning of Strategy: Part II: The Objectives (February 2018)
dc.creator | Freedman, Lawrence | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-22T19:09:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-22T19:09:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02 | |
dc.description | In this article, I show how little the general meaning of the term changed during the 19th century. Throughout Europe, discussion about strategy and tactics continued to be shaped by the sharp focus on battle and what this required of commanders. Whereas the early discussions concerning strategy in the late 18th century opened up new possibilities for thinking about the changing art of war, later discussion shut it down and thus constrained thinking. Despite the strong nationalist sentiments that shaped thinking about war, the participants in this debate were normally senior military figures who were still serving or were recently retired and were primarily concerned with officer education. They read each other’s books, if necessary in translation, and studied the same great battles of history from which they drew similar lessons.7 | en_US |
dc.description.department | LBJ School of Public Affairs | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.15781/T20863P09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63940 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas National Security Review | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Texas National Security Review | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Texas National Security Review;Vol 1, No 2 | |
dc.rights.restriction | Open | en_US |
dc.subject | Freedman Lawrence | en_US |
dc.subject | strategy | en_US |
dc.subject | tactics | en_US |
dc.subject | Europe | en_US |
dc.subject | TNSR Vol. 1, Iss. 2 | en_US |
dc.title | The Meaning of Strategy: Part II: The Objectives (February 2018) | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |