Community reconstruction in benthic paleoenvironments : trophic structure in living and dead macroinvertebrate associations, Corpus Christi and Aransas Bay systems, Texas

dc.contributor.advisorScott, Alan J. (Alan Johnson), 1933-2016
dc.creatorHarwood, Roderick J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T19:08:47Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T19:08:47Z
dc.date.issued1980
dc.description.abstractA non-transported fossil deposit is a time-averaged accumulation of the preservable, hard-part-bearing portion of a community. A simulated fossil deposit can be created by combining repeated collections of the shelled part of a Holocene living community. This study is a comparison of time-averaged monthly collections of Holocene macrobenthos, made over a two and one half year period from 21 stations in the Corpus Christi and Aransas Bay Systems, with the potential fossil deposit represented by dead shell material collected from surface sediments at the same stations. Of 112 Biologically Important Species (B.I.S.) of living macrobenthos, representing 265,050 individuals, 20 were molluscs, the rest were soft-bodied members of nine other phyla, primarily polychaetes and crustaceans. The molluscs comprised 28.4% of the total fauna --0.8% gastropods, 27.6% bivalves. Of 64 dead shelled B.I.S., representing 252,305 individuals, 63 were molluscs and one a crustacean. The molluscs comprised essentially 100% of the fauna -- 19.9% gastropods, 79.9% bivalves. Application of normal-mode numerical classification (cluster analysis) to the B.I.S. living macrobenthic, living mollusc, and dead mollusc faunal data identified station groups (communities) based on the similarity of their faunal composition. The recognition of two station groups in each of the three sets of data suggests that the faunal components at these stations represent characteristic associations of species from a single community, each association carrying with it enough of the pattern or structure of the total community to be a reflection of the distribution of that community. The Open Bay Hard Sandy Shelly Mud Community is characterized by bioturbated sandy or shelly mud that forms a hard substrate. The Open Bay Soft Mud Community is characterized by bioturbated slightly shelly mud with a soft surface layer, probably caused by shrimp dredging. Application of inverse-mode numerical classification and constancy and fidelity nodal analysis of two-way tables of the data identified the characteristic species associations for each of these two communities. Subsequent trophic analysis arranged these associations into trophic pyramids of numbers according to the feeding modes of the component species. Neither the species composition nor the trophic structure of the living and dead mollusc associations resembles those of the corresponding living macrobenthic association. Mollusc-only associations tend to overemphasize suspension-feeding primary consumers and shelled carnivores; living macrobenthic associations have more soft-bodied interface- and deposit-feeding forms, and few shelled carnivores. The species composition of the dead-mollusc associations bear little resemblance to that of the corresponding living-mollusc associations, probably because the dead fauna represents a much longer time-averaging than the years represented by the living fauna. However, the observation that living- and dead-mollusc trophic proportions, especially at the primary consumer level, are closely similar suggests a constancy of mollusc feeding niches over time, even though the species filling the niches may be different. These findings signal extreme caution in extrapolating from a fossil assemblage to the total living community from which it was derived. It is suggested, however, that if a fossil fauna similar to that of the Open Bay Hard Sandy Shelly Mud Community were interpreted to be from a similar physical environment, inferences could be made about its non-preserved soft-bodied fauna, based on the trophic comparisons in this studyen_US
dc.description.departmentEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.format.mediumelectronicen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/119163
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/46041
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUT Electronic Theses and Dissertationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en_US
dc.rights.restrictionOpenen_US
dc.subjectPaleoecologyen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.subjectTexas Gulf Regionen_US
dc.subjectAquatic invertebratesen_US
dc.subjectFossil invertebratesen_US
dc.subjectEstuarine ecologyen_US
dc.subjectBenthic ecologyen_US
dc.subjectBenthic paleoenvironmentsen_US
dc.subjectTrophic structureen_US
dc.subjectMacroinvertebratesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPaleoecology--Texas--Gulf Region
dc.subject.lcshAquatic invertebrates--Texas--Gulf Region
dc.subject.lcshInvertebrates, Fossil
dc.subject.lcshEstuarine ecology--Texas--Gulf Region
dc.subject.lcshBenthic ecology--Texas--Gulf Region
dc.titleCommunity reconstruction in benthic paleoenvironments : trophic structure in living and dead macroinvertebrate associations, Corpus Christi and Aransas Bay systems, Texasen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
thesis.degree.departmentGeological Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGeology/Geological Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Austinen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023_0353-txu-oclc-07963178.pdf
Size:
130.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final pdf File
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2023_0353-txu-oclc-07963178-TEXT.txt
Size:
279.73 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
XML Text File
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.64 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: