Subjective and objective quality assessment for advanced videos

dc.contributor.advisorBovik, Alan C. (Alan Conrad), 1958-
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWang, Zhangyang
dc.contributor.committeeMemberThomaz, Edison
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWei, Hai
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKim, Hyeji
dc.creatorShang, Zaixi
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T00:55:43Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T00:55:43Z
dc.date.issued2023-08
dc.date.submittedAugust 2023
dc.date.updated2024-04-16T00:55:43Z
dc.description.abstractThe surge of video streaming services, particularly for high motion content such as sporting events, necessitates advanced techniques to maintain video quality, facing challenges such as capture artifacts and distortions during coding and transmission. The advent of High Dynamic Range (HDR) content, offering a broader and more accurate representation of brightness and color, poses additional complexities due to increased data volume. The critical need for robust Video Quality Assessment (VQA) models arises from these challenges. To meet this need, we conducted three substantial subjective quality studies and constructed corresponding databases. The Laboratory for Image and Video Engineering (LIVE) Livestream Database comprises 315 videos of 45 source sequences from 33 original contents impaired by six types of distortions. This database facilitated the gathering of over 12,000 human opinions from 40 subjects. The LIVE HDR Database, the first of its kind dedicated to HDR10 videos, includes 310 videos from 31 distinct source sequences, processed with ten different compression and resolution combinations. This resource was instrumental in amassing over 20,000 human quality judgments under two different illumination conditions. An additional LIVE HDR AQ was developed with 400 videos from 40 unique source sequences. These videos were processed using varied compression, resolution combinations, and AQ-mode settings, to study the effects of adaptive quantization (AQ) and rate-distortion optimization techniques on HDR video perceptual quality. Building on these invaluable databases, we developed two innovative objective quality models: HDRMAX and HDRGREED. HDRMAX, a pioneering framework designed to create HDR quality-sensitive features, augments the widely-deployed Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) model, yielding significantly improved performance on both HDR and SDR videos. HDRGREED, a novel model leveraging localized histogram equalization and Difference of Gaussian filters, employs the Generalized Gaussian Distribution to model the bandpass responses and measure the entropy variations between reference and distorted videos. This model is particularly sensitive to banding and blocking artifacts introduced by inappropriate AQ settings. In conclusion, the comprehensive subjective quality studies and databases, along with the state-of-the-art objective quality models, HDRMAX and HDRGREED, significantly contribute to the advancement of future VQA models. These tools cater specifically to challenges posed by live streaming and HDR content, providing critical resources for the development, testing, and comparison of future VQA models. These databases, publicly available for research purposes, and the innovative models offer valuable insights to improve and control the perceptual quality of streamed videos.
dc.description.departmentElectrical and Computer Engineering
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/124832
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/51434
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectLivestream
dc.subjectVideo quality assessment
dc.subjectHigh dynamic range video
dc.titleSubjective and objective quality assessment for advanced videos
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentElectrical and Computer Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SHANG-PRIMARY-2024-1.pdf
Size:
12.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
4.45 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: