Effect of Solenopsis invicta presence on species diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods at Brackenridge Field Laboratory
Access full-text files
Date
2019-12-09
Authors
Sawyer, Weatherly A.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Department
Description
The invasive ant species Solenopsis invicta, more commonly known as the Fire Ant,
made its first appearance in the Southern United States in the 1930’s. These ants adapted
quickly to the landscape of Southern states and grew rapidly in population size. Soon, S.
invicta’s widespread and invasive presence was reflected in vertebrate and invertebrate
populations alike, a trend which encouraged studies over the environmental impact of the
ant. While earlier studies in areas with S. invicta concluded that the species diversity of
ground-dwelling arthropod populations was significantly less, later studies in those same
areas concluded that the species diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods had returned to preinvasion
levels. As a response to these former experiments, I conducted an experiment at
Brackenridge Field Laboratory in Austin, Texas, which replicated previous testing methods
for arthropod diversity. This experiment was conducted using several plots in which bait
traps were first deployed to test for the presence of S. invicta in the plot. Once S. invicta
presence was determined in a plot, pitfall traps were purposefully set in marked plots both
with and without S. invicta in order to test for arthropod species richness. After counting and
identifying the collected arthropods, one-tailed and two-tailed t-tests were run to determine
the significance of the difference between the species richness of arthropod populations in
plots with S. invicta presence and arthropod species richness in plots lacking S. invicta. I
concluded that there was no significant difference in species diversity of arthropod
populations between plots containing S. invicta and plots lacking S. invicta. Despite some
external variables such as inconsistencies of weather and sampling procedures, the resulting
conclusions corresponded with my null hypothesis and expectations from preliminary
research on the subject.