New approaches to model and analyze diagnostic fracturing injection tests

dc.contributor.advisorSharma, Mukul M.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCramer, Dave
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFoster, John
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSepehrnoori, Kamy
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMcClure, Mark
dc.creatorWang, HanYi
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T15:58:57Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T15:58:57Z
dc.date.created2019-08
dc.date.issued2019-08-12
dc.date.submittedAugust 2019
dc.date.updated2019-09-25T15:58:58Z
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades, Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT), which have also been referred to as Injection-Falloff Tests, Fracture Calibration Tests, MiniFrac Tests in the literature, have evolved into a commonly used and reliable technique to evaluate reservoir properties, fracturing parameters and obtain in-situ stresses. However, the established methods for modeling analyzing DFIT data make two simplifying assumptions: (1) Carter’s leak-off and, (2) Constant fracture compliance (or stiffness) during fracture closure. Both assumptions are violated during fracture closure and this is why G-function based models and subsequent related work can lead to an incorrect interpretation of closure pressure and are not capable of consistently fitting both before and after closure data coherently. In addition, current after-closure analysis relies on impulse solutions with short-term injection assumption and assumes that all injected fluid leaks off into formation. In reality, fluid continues leaking into formation with variable fracture-wellbore system storage, and some injected fluid stay inside wellbore due to pressurization and some stay inside fracture because of residual fracture width. Thus, without considering variable system storage and the associated fluid leak-off, the shortterm impulse solution may introduce significant errors in our interpretation of afterclosure data. In this dissertation, a global DFIT model is developed, which not only preserves the physics of unsteady-state reservoir flow behavior, elastic fracture mechanics, material balance, but also accounts for variable fracture stiffness/compliance and fracture pressure dependent leak-off during fracture closure. For the first time, the before-closure and afterclosure data can be analyzed coherently in a single mathematical model. With our new global DFIT model, we investigated how different mechanisms impact pressure fall-off behavior in a coupled manner. This had been oversimplified in existing literature. In addition, based on this global model, we present a new method to estimate the minimum in-situ stress and to history match DFIT data globally using forward modeling and inverse modeling approaches. New workflows have been proposed to analyze the DFIT data to obtain pore pressure, formation permeability, fracture surface roughness properties and the associated un-propped fracture conductivity. In addition, the normalized fracture conductivity as a function of effective normal stress can be obtained from the DFIT data. Unique pressure fall-off signatures that are associated with naturally fractured reservoirs are presented and discussed, along with representative field cases. Finally, a modified DFIT, rapid injection and fall-off test (RIFT) is proposed to estimate in-situ stress and pore pressure in a single test, without having to shut-in these wells for weeks. RIFT can be used to estimate the minimum in-situ stress in naturally fractured reservoirs with strong pressure-dependent permeability, where DFIT often fails to identify the closure pressure. In addition, the cumulative flow-back volume in the wellbore storage regime on a stiffness plot provides an estimate of the effective fracture volume.
dc.description.departmentPetroleum and Geosystems Engineering
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/75999
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/3098
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectDFIT
dc.subjectStress determination
dc.subjectPore pressure
dc.subjectFracture conductivity
dc.subjectNatural fracture
dc.subjectUnconventional resources
dc.titleNew approaches to model and analyze diagnostic fracturing injection tests
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentPetroleum and Geosystems Engineering
thesis.degree.disciplinePetroleum Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WANG-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf
Size:
14.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
4.45 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: