Voting as a Positive Right: A Reply to Flanders
| dc.creator | Fishkin, Joseph | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-27T14:05:44Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2013-03-27T14:05:44Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-06 | en |
| dc.description | Chad Flanders' thoughtful article1 demonstrates that the Murkowski litigation raised questions with surprisingly fundamental implications for election law. This brief response addresses just one of the those questions. The question, which at first blush sounds awfully narrow and wonkish, is this: Can a state allow write-in votes, but discourage them by making them difficult to cast?2 I will argue that the answer is no - for reasons that highlight two fundamental, but underappreciated, aspects of election law. | en |
| dc.description.department | Law | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Fishkin, J. (2011). Voting as a positive right: A reply to Flanders. Alaska Law Review, 28(1), 29-38. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss1/2 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/19777 | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | Alaska Law Review | en |
| dc.subject | voting | en |
| dc.subject | Flanders, Chad | en |
| dc.subject | Flanders | en |
| dc.subject | write-in votes | en |
| dc.subject | election law | en |
| dc.subject | Murkowski litigation | en |
| dc.title | Voting as a Positive Right: A Reply to Flanders | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
Access full-text files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- fishkin_AlaskaLawReview.pdf
- Size:
- 102.12 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- admin_deposit_fairuse.pdf
- Size:
- 68.52 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Administrative Deposit
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- alaska_law_review.pdf
- Size:
- 23.26 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Language from Author Agreement