Modality in flux
dc.contributor.advisor | Dever, Josh | en |
dc.contributor.advisor | Asher, Nicholas | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Beaver, David I. | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Kamp, Hans | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Sainsbury, Richard M. | en |
dc.creator | Willer, Malte | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-05T21:38:42Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-05T21:38:42Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-05T21:38:48Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2010-05 | en |
dc.date.submitted | May 2010 | en |
dc.date.updated | 2010-10-05T21:38:48Z | en |
dc.description | text | en |
dc.description.abstract | I develop a novel semantic theory for modals that has important consequences for contemporary work in epistemology, metaphysics and ethics. My theory replaces the dominant view about semantics--that our best theory of meaning should ascribe truth-conditions to modalized sentences--with a non-truth-conditional yet fully compositional semantics for modals. Its contributions to current debates in analytic philosophy include an explanation of the possibility of modal disagreement that avoids relativism, a solution to the paradoxes about conditional obligations (including the gentle murder paradox), and new impulses for a generalized solution to the Frege-Geach problem for noncognitivism. | en |
dc.description.department | Philosophy | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-1097 | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.subject | Dynamic semantics | en |
dc.subject | Conditionals | en |
dc.subject | Deontic modals | en |
dc.subject | Epistemic modals | en |
dc.subject | Frege-Geach problem | en |
dc.subject | Noncognitivism | en |
dc.title | Modality in flux | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
thesis.degree.department | Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Texas at Austin | en |
thesis.degree.level | Doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |