The impact of the inappropriate modeling of cross-classified data structures

dc.contributor.advisorBeretvas, Susan Natashaen
dc.creatorMeyers, Jason Leonen
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-28T22:32:09Zen
dc.date.available2008-08-28T22:32:09Zen
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.description.abstractHierarchical linear modeling (HLM) is typically used in the social sciences to model data from clustered settings, such as students nested within classrooms. However, not all multilevel data are purely hierarchical in nature. For example, students can be nested within the neighborhoods in which they live and within the schools they attend. But, most likely, students from a given neighborhood do not all attend the same school and students from a given school do not all reside within the same neighborhood. Because neighborhoods are not nested within schools nor vice-versa, the two are said to be cross-classified. Cross-classified random effects modeling (CCREM) is used to model data from these non-hierarchical contexts. While use of CCREM has increased in various disciplines such as medicine, it is seldom used in educational research. CCREM is mentioned in most multilevel modeling textbooks (for example, Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002; Hox, 2002; Snijders & Boskers, 1999). However, it remains infrequently used, most likely because the models are technically sophisticated and can be somewhat difficult to interpret. Little research has been conducted assessing when it is necessary to use CCREM, so this dissertation involved several studies. A Monte Carlo Simulation Study was conducted in order to investigate potential factors affecting the need to use CCREM as well as the impact of ignoring cross-classification. As a follow-up study, CCREM was applied to a large-scale national data set in order to provide insight into the potential effects of ignoring the cross-classified data structure. Results of both studies indicated that when using HLM instead of CCREM, the fixed effect estimates were unaffected but the standard error estimates associated with the variables modeled incorrectly were biased. In addition, the estimates of the variance components displayed bias. The observed bias was related to the proportion of the total variance that was between each cross-classified factor, the sample size, and the similarity of the cross-classified factors. Implications and limitations are discussed and suggestions for future research are presented.
dc.description.departmentEducational Psychologyen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.identifierb60824049en
dc.identifier.oclc68904362en
dc.identifier.proqst3145342en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/2086en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en
dc.subject.lcshMultilevel models (Statistics)en
dc.subject.lcshEducation--Research--Mathematical modelsen
dc.subject.lcshAnalysis of varianceen
dc.subject.lcshSampling (Statistics)en
dc.subject.lcshMonte Carlo methoden
dc.titleThe impact of the inappropriate modeling of cross-classified data structuresen
dc.type.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Psychologyen
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Psychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Access full-text files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
meyersjl042.pdf
Size:
327.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.65 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: