Controlling the fire : new-left governments and contentious movements in twenty-first century Latin America
dc.contributor.advisor | Weyland, Kurt Gerhard | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Madrid, Raul | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Hunter, Wendy | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Brinks, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Young, Michael | |
dc.creator | Burt, Thomas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-15T15:25:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-15T15:25:08Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-27 | |
dc.date.submitted | August 2021 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-04-15T15:25:09Z | |
dc.description.abstract | How did the progressive governments of Latin America’s “pink tide” respond to the pressure of contentious social movements? Whereas the conventional wisdom depicts a “bottom-up” dynamic in which leftist presidents helped radical groups achieve long-term goals, I claim instead that left-wing rulers also employed “top-down” mechanisms to bring these organizations under control. In some cases, governments developed friendly ties with movements, helping them pursue long-sought objectives. In others, however, presidents neglected their demands and subjected groups to tactics of suppression. What explains this variation? I argue that two essential variables shape executive responses to radical mobilization: 1) the levels of compatibility between government and movement objectives; and 2) the degree of power concentration enjoyed by the executive. Based on eight months of field research about the new-left presidencies of the Kirchners in Argentina and Evo Morales in Bolivia, I demonstrate how these two factors conditioned the strategies that “pink-tide” presidents employed to handle the pressure of progressive social movements. Specifically, I argue that the interplay between these variables will produce one of the following results: a) alliance; b) cartelization; c) co-optation; and d) coercion. In considering a breadth of possible outcomes, my explanatory framework captures the varied patterns of government-movement interactions, and presents a novel take on the relationship between these actors during Latin America’s political move to the left. | |
dc.description.department | Government | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2152/111150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/38055 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.subject | Latin America | |
dc.subject | Leftist governments | |
dc.subject | Social movements | |
dc.subject | Co-optation | |
dc.subject | Coercion | |
dc.subject | Cartelization | |
dc.subject | Alliance | |
dc.subject | Argentina | |
dc.subject | Bolivia | |
dc.title | Controlling the fire : new-left governments and contentious movements in twenty-first century Latin America | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.type.material | text | |
thesis.degree.department | Government | |
thesis.degree.discipline | Government | |
thesis.degree.grantor | The University of Texas at Austin | |
thesis.degree.level | Doctoral | |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy |
Access full-text files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1