The social base of divide-and-rule : left-Islamist opposition alliances in North Africa’s Arab Spring

dc.contributor.advisorBrownlee, Jason, 1974-
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHenry, Clement
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBoone, Catherine
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCharrad, Mounira
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStacher, Joshua
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPedahzur, Ami
dc.creatorBuehler, Matthew J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T18:05:24Z
dc.date.available2020-10-13T18:05:24Z
dc.date.created2013-08
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.date.submittedAugust 2013
dc.date.updated2020-10-13T18:05:25Z
dc.description.abstractUnder what conditions do opposition political parties cooperate across ideological cleavages? Why do such opposition alliances collapse or endure over time? I address these questions by comparing alliances between leftist and Islamist opposition parties in Tunisia, Morocco, and Mauritania. In Tunisia, leftists have joined forces with Islamists on the national-level. In Morocco and Mauritania, such alliances have formed and endured in municipalities and labor unions but they have collapsed on the national-level. Why do these Arab states, despite their similar culture, demography, and French colonial heritage, have such different histories of left-Islamist alliances? Using a multi-method approach, including over 100 Arabic field interviews and an original dataset, this paper argues that left-Islamist alliances form as a mutual-defense strategy against a threat and endure when both parties have a similar social base – urban, educated social classes. If one of the two parties draws on a rural and illiterate social base, however, it becomes vulnerable to co-optation that causes alliance collapse. When leftists and Islamists had similar social origins and class interests in urban areas, they were more likely to build enduring opposition alliances during the 2011 Arab Spring. This finding leads to one overarching point: authoritarian regimes that monopolized rural politics and employed co-optation to fend-off opposition alliances proved more resilient during the Arab Spring
dc.description.departmentGovernment
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/83189
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/10188
dc.subjectIslamists
dc.subjectAlliances
dc.subjectOpposition coordination
dc.subjectPolitical Islam
dc.subjectDemocratization
dc.subjectTunisia
dc.subjectMorocco
dc.subjectMauritania
dc.subjectArab Spring
dc.titleThe social base of divide-and-rule : left-Islamist opposition alliances in North Africa’s Arab Spring
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentGovernment
thesis.degree.disciplineGovernment
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austin
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BUEHLER-DISSERTATION-2013.pdf
Size:
1.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: