The quality of disclosure and governance and their effect on litigation risk

dc.contributor.advisorStarks, Laura T.
dc.creatorMohan, Saumyaen
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T20:09:36Zen
dc.date.available2015-04-28T20:09:36Zen
dc.date.issued2006-08en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the relationship between three sets of variables: corporate governance and monitoring, the quality of disclosure in annual reports and securities class action litigation. In the first section, I present a game-theoretic model in which shareholders select from ex ante monitoring or ex post litigation mechanisms available to them in order to mitigate the agency problem. Firm characteristics determine the choice of which of these two mechanisms is appropriate for a particular company. I then test predictions from this model and find that firms with poor monitoring are much more likely than those with good monitoring to be sued even after controlling for the common determinants of a lawsuit. The second section of the dissertation relates the quality of disclosure in annual reports to litigation. I use a dataset containing annual reports filed electronically with the SEC in the period 1996-2005. Using two content analysis software programs that analyze the categories of words used in these annual reports, I find that firms that use more numbers, past and future words, and other informative words are much less likely to be sued, even after controlling for the common determinants of lawsuits. In order to avoid subjectively choosing categories, I use principal components analysis to identify the major components of annual report disclosure. When these components are used as regressors to identify causative factors of lawsuits, one component named 'informativeness' has significant power to explain subsequent lawsuits. In head-to-head comparisons of the 'informativeness' principal component with Standard & Poor's Transparency and Disclosure score, my informativeness measure is more effective than the S&P score in predicting the likelihood of a lawsuit. Finally, in cross-sectional tests, I find support for the theory that firms with good boards and managers who are not entrenched have better disclosure practices. Further, monitoring by institutional investors, independent boards and analysts appears to induce better corporate disclosure.en
dc.description.departmentFinanceen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/29642en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen
dc.subjectCorporate monitoringen
dc.subjectQuality of disclosureen
dc.subjectAnnual reportsen
dc.subjectSecurities class action litigationen
dc.subjectLitigation risken
dc.subjectGame theory modelen
dc.subjectLawsuitsen
dc.subjectInformativenessen
dc.titleThe quality of disclosure and governance and their effect on litigation risken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentFinanceen
thesis.degree.disciplineFinanceen
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
mohans73701.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.66 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: