Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVan Rensburg, W. C. J.en
dc.contributor.advisorSepehrnoori, Kamy, 1951-en
dc.creatorXu, Liying, 1962-en
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-17T18:43:32Zen
dc.date.available2012-07-17T18:43:32Zen
dc.date.created2010-12en
dc.date.issued2012-07-17en
dc.date.submittedDecember 2010en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2549en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis study is to establish a binomial lattice method to apply real options theory to valuation and decision making in the petroleum exploration and production industry with a specific focus on the switching time from primary to water flooding oil recovery. First, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) historical oil price evolution in the past 25 years is studied and modeled with the geometric Brownian motion (GBM) and one-factor mean reversion price models to capture the oil price uncertainty. Second, to conduct real options evaluation, specific reservoir simulations are designed and oil production profile for primary and water flooding oil recovery for a synthetic onshore oil reservoir is generated using UTCHEM reservoir simulator. Third, a cash flow model from producing the oil reservoir is created with a concessionary fiscal system. Finally, the binomial lattice real options evaluation method is established to value the project with flexibility in the switching time from primary to water flooding oil recovery under uncertain oil prices. The research reaches seven conclusions: 1) for the GBM price model, the assumptions of constant drift rate and constant volatility do not hold for WTI historical oil price; 2) one-factor mean reversion price model is a better model to fit the historical WTI oil prices than the GBM model; 3) the evolution of historical WTI oil prices from January 2, 1986 to May 28, 2010 was according to three price regimes with different long run prices; 4) the established real options evaluation method can be used to identify the best time to switch from primary to water flooding oil recovery using stochastic oil prices; 5) with the mean reversion oil price model and the most updated cost data, the real options evaluation method finds that the water flooding switching time is earlier than the traditional net present value (NPV) optimizing method; 6) the real options evaluation results reveals that most of time water flooding should start when oil price is high, and should not start when oil price is low; and 7) water flooding switching time is sensitive to oil price model to be used and to the investment and operating costs.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectReal optionsen
dc.subjectPetroleum E&Pen
dc.subjectDecision makingen
dc.subjectPrice modelen
dc.subjectWater floodingen
dc.subjectSwitching timeen
dc.subjectMean reversionen
dc.titleApplication of real options to valuation and decision making in the petroleum E&P industryen
dc.date.updated2012-07-17T18:44:02Zen
dc.identifier.slug2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2549en
dc.description.departmentPetroleum and Geosystems Engineeringen
dc.type.genrethesisen
thesis.degree.departmentPetroleum and Geosystems Engineeringen
thesis.degree.disciplinePetroleum Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record