Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorArroyo-Martínez, Jossiannaen
dc.contributor.advisorSalgado, César Augustoen
dc.creatorOleen, Garrett Alanen
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-10T18:30:00Zen
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-10T18:30:16Zen
dc.date.available2011-02-10T18:30:00Zen
dc.date.available2011-02-10T18:30:16Zen
dc.date.issued2010-12en
dc.date.submittedDecember 2010en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2429en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractMy purpose in writing this dissertation is to re-evaluate the works of three influential Spanish-Caribbean authors who seem to be remembered more as exceptional historical characters rather than for their literature itself. Although often considered to be important contributors to the Spanish-Caribbean literary canon, these writers have also suffered a measure of marginalization as scholars have relegated them to the status of discursive subjects rather than evaluate them as authorial agents. As a consequence, the majority of their works have not been fully recognized as important factors in nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty first century literary production. I show how in their writings – many of which have been misunderstood, under-evaluated, and/or forgotten altogether – these writers narrated their own precarious situations and lifted their voice in protest against slavery, racism and economic oppression at a time when the dominant discourses and heavy-handed controls of the Spanish colonial government strictly forbid them to do so. These authors are Juan Francisco Manzano, Gabriel de la Concepción Valdés (Plácido) and Eleuterio Derkes. Because these authors lived in Cuba (Manzano and Plácido) and Puerto Rico (Derkes) as colonial subjects underneath the oppressive structures of their respective plantation and hacienda economies based on sugar production and slave labor, they experienced difficult colonial conditions and as such are able to narrate this life through a unique perspective that other writers associated with the dominant discourses of the time could not. While these brands of hegemony were indeed forced upon them as writers and artists, it did not stop them from narrating and communicating their unique Spanish Caribbean perspective. I show how these authors, as marginalized figures of nineteenth century plantation society, engineered their own discourses around these hegemonic institutions – writing between the lines of hegemony and concurrent with it at the same time – in order to create an alternative image of nineteenth century Spanish Caribbean society that requires further critical consideration and perspective.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectCaribbean literatureen
dc.subjectSpanish literatureen
dc.subjectHispanic literatureen
dc.subjectJuan Francisco Manzanoen
dc.subjectPlácidoen
dc.subjectEleuterio Derkesen
dc.subjectGabriel de la Concepción Valdésen
dc.subjectCuban literatureen
dc.subjectPuerto Rican literatureen
dc.title19th century plantation counter-discourses in Juan Francisco Manzano, Gabriel de la Concepción Valdés (Plácido), and Eleuterio Derkesen
dc.date.updated2011-02-10T18:30:16Zen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNicolopolus, James R.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHarney, Michael P.en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSidbury, Jamesen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBernucci, Leopoldoen
dc.description.departmentSpanish and Portugueseen
dc.type.genrethesisen
thesis.degree.departmentSpanish and Portugueseen
thesis.degree.disciplineSpanish-Portugueseen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record