TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Simulation study of surfactant transport mechanisms in naturally fractured reservoirs

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ABBASI-ASL-THESIS.pdf (1.921Mb)
    Date
    2010-08
    Author
    Abbasi Asl, Yousef
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Surfactants both change the wettability and lower the interfacial tension by various degrees depending on the type of surfactant and how it interacts with the specific oil. Ultra low IFT means almost zero capillary pressure, which in turn indicates little oil should be produced from capillary imbibition when the surfactant reduces the IFT in naturally fractured oil reservoirs that are mixed-wet or oil-wet. What is the transport mechanism for the surfactant to get far into the matrix and how does it scale? Molecular diffusion and capillary pressure are much too slow to explain the experimental data. Recent dynamic laboratory data suggest that the process is faster when a pressure gradient is applied compared to static tests. A mechanistic chemical compositional simulator was used to study the effect of pressure gradient on chemical oil recovery from naturally fractured oil reservoirs for several different chemical processes (polymer, surfactant, surfactant-polymer, alkali-surfactant-polymer flooding). The fractures were simulated explicitly by using small gridblocks with fracture properties. Both homogeneous and heterogeneous matrix blocks were simulated. Microemulsion phase behavior and related chemistry and physics were modeled in a manner similar to single porosity reservoirs. The simulations indicate that even very small pressure gradients (transverse to the flow in the fractures) are highly significant in terms of the chemical transport into the matrix and that increasing the injected fluid viscosity greatly improves the oil recovery. Field scale simulations show that the transverse pressure gradients promote transport of the surfactant into the matrix at a feasible rate even when there is a high contrast between the permeability of the fractures and the matrix. These simulations indicate that injecting a chemical solution that is viscous (because of polymer or foam or microemulsion) and lowers the IFT as well as alters the wettability from mixed-wet to water-wet, produces more oil and produces it faster than static chemical processes. These findings have significant implications for enhanced oil recovery from naturally fractured oil reservoirs and how these processes should be optimized and scaled up from the laboratory to the field.
    Department
    Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering
    Description
    text
    Subject
    Wettability
    IFT
    Simulation
    Imbibition
    Fractured
    Oil-wet
    Mixed-wet
    Water-wet
    Interfacial tension
    UTCHEM
    Capillary
    Gravity
    Microemulsion
    Surfactant
    Alkali
    Polymer
    Recovery
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-08-1707
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin