TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Understanding political leaders and political processes through language

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JORDAN-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf (1.550Mb)
    Date
    2020-05-08
    Author
    Jordan, Kayla Nicole
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Political leaders and processes have long been studied by many disciplines including political science, communication, and psychology. Developments in technology and methodology make it possible expand and refine our understanding of how people move in the political realm. The current work builds from existing multidisciplinary work to explore political questions using psychological text analysis. Beyond the content of what people say, how people use words like pronouns, articles, and prepositions can illuminate deeper psychological traits such as thinking style, authenticity, and confidence (Boyd, 2017; Kacewicz et al., 2014; Pennebaker et al., 2014; Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010). By combining psychological text analytic methods with traditional questions and methods, a more holistic understanding of how people act and interact within the political sphere can be developed. This dissertation presents a set of three studies exploring political leaders and processes through the lens of leaders, citizens, and the media. The first published study examined trends in leadership traits over time with a focus on a narrative, confident communication styles (Jordan, Sterling, Pennebaker, & Boyd, 2019). The second published study explored how citizens during the 2016 presidential election talked about the candidates on Twitter and what impact that conversation had on people’s perceptions of the candidates (Jordan, Pennebaker, & Ehrig, 2018). The third study looked at the media as a mediator of perceptions of political candidates by analyzing coverage of major party presidential candidates in the last five U.S. election (Jordan, in preparation).
    Department
    Psychology
    Subject
    Text analysis
    Political psychology
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/2152/85409
    http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/12373
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin