Show simple item record

dc.creatorBradley, D.
dc.creatorDoran, E.E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T20:12:45Z
dc.date.available2019-02-11T20:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2329-5724
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2152/72860
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on Texas House Bill 51 (TX HB 51) and its impact as a performance-based funding policy. Specifically, TX HB 51 incentivized regional comprehensive institutions towards high research activity in pursuit of academic excellence and nationally recognized prestige. Employing critical policy analysis, we considered the societal and economic costs of the state priorities that informed TX HB 51 for various stakeholders across the state. Through this lens, we offered a critical interrogation of the potentially negative economic and social impacts of this funding mechanism through a lens that considers historical and persistent racial inequity and power differentials across dominant and non-dominant groups within U.S. society at large.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Education Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTexas Education Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTexas Education Review;Vol. 7, Issue 1
dc.subjectperformance-based fundingen_US
dc.subjectcritical policy analysisen_US
dc.subjectequity and accessen_US
dc.titleTexas House Bill 51—An incognito performance-based funding policy: Implications for access and equity in Texasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.departmentEducationen_US
dc.rights.restrictionOpenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record