Automated testing and sketching of alloy models
MetadataShow full item record
Models of software systems, e.g., designs, play an important role in the development of reliable and dependable systems. However, writing correct designs is hard. What makes formulating desired design properties particularly hard is the common lack of intuitive and effective techniques for validating their correctness. Despite significant advances in developing notations and languages for writing designs, techniques for validating them are often not as advanced and pose an undue burden on the users. Our thesis is that some foundational and widely used techniques in software testing -- the most common methodology for validating quality of code -- can provide a basis to develop a familiar and effective new approach for checking the correctness of designs. We lay a new foundation for testing designs in the traditional spirit of testing code. Our specific focus is the Alloy language, which is particularly useful for building models of software systems. Alloy is a first-order language based on relations and is supported by a SAT-based analysis tool, which provides a natural backend for building new analyses for Alloy. In recent work, we defined a foundation for testing Alloy models in the spirit of the widely practiced unit testing methodology popularized by the xUnit family of frameworks, such as JUnit for Java. Specifically, AUnit, our testing framework for Alloy, defines test cases, test outcomes (pass/fail), and model coverage, and forms a foundation that enables development of new testing techniques for Alloy. To provide a more robust validation environment for Alloy, we build on the AUnit foundation in four primary ways. One, we introduce test generation algorithms, which automate creation of test inputs, which is traditionally one of the most costly steps in testing. Two, we introduce synthesis of parts of Alloy models using sketching by enumeration and constraint checking, where the user writes a partial Alloy model and outlines the expected behavior using tests, and our sketching framework completes the Alloy model for the user. Three, we investigate optimizations to improve the efficacy of our core model sketching techniques targeting improved scalability. Four, we introduce a second approach for sketching Alloy models that incorporates attributes from our test generation efforts as well as our initial sketching framework and uses equivalent formulas to outline expected behavior rather than tests. To evaluate our techniques, we use a suite of well-studied Alloy models, including some from Alloy's standard distribution, as well as models written by graduate students as part of their homework.