TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Rate of penetration (ROP) enhancement in shales through osmotic processes

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    AHMAD-THESIS-2015.pdf (5.528Mb)
    Date
    2015-05
    Author
    Ahmad, Muneeb
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Shales and other clay-bearing rocks make up 70% to 80% of all formations drilled globally. In addition, according to the US Energy Information Administration, as of June 2013, approximately 26% of the technically recoverable hydrocarbon resources of the United States were in the form of shale tight oil and shale gas. Accordingly, there has been an increasing focus on efficient drilling of deep and tight shale formations. However, serious drilling problems such as bit balling and wellbore instability are encountered while drilling shale, especially in deep, high-pressure wells. Most of these drilling problems are not caused by the mechanical strength of the rock but by the chemically reactive nature of such formations, causing rock cuttings to stick to the bit. Such an undesirable effect decreases the rate of penetration (ROP) and has a damaging effect on the wellbore. Previous approaches to this problem were based on either improving the drilling hydraulics or the polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bit design, or modifying the mud chemistry. This thesis introduces a new approach to prevent adherence of shale cuttings to the bit by taking advantage of the phenomenon of chemical osmosis. Chemical osmosis occurs when fluid movement is governed by chemical potential gradients. Drilling with a high salinity/ low water activity drilling mud gives inception to movement of water out of shale cuttings toward the drilling bit due to the difference of water activity between the shale and the drilling fluid. While previous studies showed that the movement of water out of shales also helps to mechanically stabilize them, this study suggests that such a dehydration of formation rock cuttings also prevents shale cuttings from sticking to the bit, resulting in higher rates of penetration. It is also suggested that the same mechanism is responsible for achieving the ROP benefits from high salinity formate muds, which enabled three times faster drilling than the oil-based mud at high densities during the deep trek testing in 2002. Support for the proposed mechanism is provided by an extensive set of laboratory measurements, ranging from simple hot-rolling tests that measure accretion tendencies of shale on steel to realistic drilling tests on full-scale equipment and actual PDC bits under downhole conditions. Results from the drilling tests indicate that both low and high salinity formate muds outperform the corresponding weight water-based muds in the Mancos shale, by yielding 50% to 60% higher ROP especially at a higher weight on bit (WOB; i.e., corresponding to greater depths). Results from field trials with formate muds for ROP enhancement in Canada indicate significantly enhanced drilling rates with respect to those of oil/synthetic mud causing an approximately 50% reduction in average drilling time, thereby supporting the merits of chemical osmosis for ROP enhancement.
    Department
    Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering
    Description
    text
    Subject
    Chemical osmosis
    Shale drilling
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/32043
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin