• Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Investigation of the pore size and structure in organic-rich shales

    Icon
    View/Open
    EZIDIEGWU-THESIS-2015.pdf (2.025Mb)
    Date
    2015-05
    Author
    Ezidiegwu, Sandra Nkechinyere
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Permeability in source rocks allows the flow of reservoir fluids during production and is dependent on the pore size distribution. In organic shales, the level of porosity of organic material (OM) is based on its range of pore sizes. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images are commonly used to examine OM-hosted pores, but this technique is limited by resolution, which is in the order of ~5 nm. This study seeks to increase this range of pore size distribution (PSD) to ~ 0.38 nm, in organic-rich shales by using low-pressure carbon dioxide (CO₂) adsorption coupled with density functional theory (DFT). In addition, we coupled low-pressure nitrogen (N₂) adsorption with the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) and DFT models to quantify pore sizes between ~2 to 170 nm. To characterize the entire range of pore sizes, we used high-pressure mercury intrusion because it is commonly used to quantify larger pores. The samples used in this study include a bulk sample and isolated kerogen of Green River shale (Eocene, Utah), Woodford shale (Upper Devonian, Oklahoma), and Cameo Coal (Cretaceous, Colorado). These samples represent type I, II and III, kerogen, respectively, at similar maturity levels and thus provide a good experimental basis for evaluating the PSD. The methodology consisted of four steps: i) Kerogens were isolated from the bulk samples by demineralization, ii) Samples were divided into sizes of ~ 0.5 grams into test tubes and degassed, iii) Samples were analyzed in the Porosimeter using low-pressure N₂ and CO₂ adsorption techniques, iv) Isotherm data from the adsorption measurement were extracted to create the PSD. Our results showed the presence of pore sizes as small as ~ 0.38 nm, based on combining techniques of N₂ adsorption at 77 K and CO₂ adsorption at 273 K in all three samples. Hence, we have expanded our understanding of the range of pore sizes contained in organic-rich material. In addition, the majority of pores in Green River shale and cameo coal fell below the SEM resolution limit of ~5 nm. Lastly, the kerogen and bulk samples of the Green River and Woodford shales showed a variation in the PSD, with the larger pores in the kerogen, which indicates that kerogen constitutes the majority of the pores in the samples. In conclusion, we developed a novel approach to investigate OM-hosted pore sizes. This approach increased the range of pore sizes from ~ 5 nm to ~ 0.38 nm, thus improving the estimation of flow rates during production in shale and in applicable reservoirs.
    Department
    Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering
    Description
    text
    Subject
    Organic-rich shales
    Porosity
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/32040
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    Login

    Information

    AboutContactPoliciesGetting StartedGlossaryHelpFAQs

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin