TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Testing the validity of a non-associative theory of Pavlovian learning, Rate Estimation Theory (RET)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    geane35393.pdf (1.115Mb)
    Date
    2006
    Author
    Gean, Emily Grace
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract: The current dissertation tested the validity of a non-associative account of Pavlovian conditioning. Pavlovian conditioning involves the presentation of an arbitrary stimulus (the CS) followed by a stimulus that elicits an innate response (the US), such as food. After at least one presentation of the CS-US pairing, responding begins to develop to the presentation of the CS alone (the CR). Associative theories claim that the CR develops as a result of the association between the CS and the US strengthening. An alternative, non-associative account of Pavlovian conditioning, Rate Estimation Theory (RET), has been proposed. In this theory, the CR develops when the ratio of the rate of US occurrences during the CS presentation (T) exceeds the rate of US occurrences when the subject is in the experimental environment (I) and the CS is absent vi by a specific amount, or a large I/T ratio. The present dissertation tested the validity of RET. In Experiments 1 and 2, RET’s claim that the order of occurrence of the context exposure and the CS presentation do not affect the CR was tested. The results of these tests indicated that, contrary to RET, the order of presentation of these components of the conditioning trial did affect the CR. In Experiment 3, it was tested whether an alternative type of CR, goal tracking, was elicited in a similar pattern as the CR described by RET. RET only allows for one type of CR, sign tracking. The results indicated that the pattern of goal tracking was not the same as the pattern of sign tracking. Experiments 4, 5, and 6 tested the effect of the CS type on the development of the CR. Contrary to RET’s prediction that the CS type has no effect on the CR, CSs of higher visual salience elicited more approach responding to the CS than did less visually salient CSs. Contrary to RET’s claim that the I/T ratio is the sole determiner of the CR, the results of the present experiments indicated that the order of presentation of the I and the T, and the type of CS used affect the CR.
    Department
    Psychology
    Description
    text
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/2692
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin