Can Institutions Build Unity in Multiethnic States?
MetadataShow full item record
We investigate whether political institutions can promote attachment to the state in multiethnic societies. Building on literatures on nationalism, democratization, and conﬂict resolution, we discuss the importance of attachment, understood as a psychological identiﬁcation with, and pride in, the state. We construct a model of state attachment, specifying the individual-, group-, and state-level conditions that foster it. Then, using cross-national survey data from 51 multiethnic states, we show that, in general, ethnic minorities manifest less attachment to the states in which they reside than do majorities. Combining the survey data with minority group attributes and country-level attributes, we show that the attachment of minorities varies importantly across groups and countries. Our central ﬁnding is that federalism and proportional electoral systems—–two highly touted solutions to ethnic divisions—–have at best mixed effects. These results have implications for state-building and democratic consolidation in ethnically heterogeneous states.
CitationElkins, Zachary and John Sides. “Can Institutions Build Unity in Multiethnic States?” 2007. American Political Science Review 101: 693-708.
The following license files are associated with this item: