Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCharrad, M. (Mounira)
dc.contributor.advisorKurtz, Lester R.
dc.creatorRitter, Daniel Philipen
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-22T17:07:07Zen
dc.date.issued2010-05en
dc.date.submittedMay 2010en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-910en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/21097en
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractFrom angry torch-swinging Parisians attacking the Bastille and Russian workers rising up against the Tsar to outraged Chinese peasants exacting revenge on their landlords and Cuban guerrillas battling Batista’s army, revolutions without violence have in the past been near inconceivable. But when unarmed Iranians after an extended popular struggle forced Muhammad Reza Pahlavi, the last king of Iran, to flee Tehran on January 16, 1979, they had gifted the world a new and seemingly paradoxical phenomenon: a nonviolent revolution. Far from a historical oddity, such revolutions have since occurred on almost every continent. Over the past thirty years the function of guerrilla tactics, military coups, and civil war has increasingly been replaced by demonstrations, boycotts, and strikes. How can social scientists account for this “evolution of revolution” that have so altered the appearance of the phenomenon that by Arendt’s definition events in places like Iran, the Philippines, Chile, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Serbia, Georgia, and Ukraine may not even qualify as revolutions? Yet, the popular overthrows of authoritarian regimes in each and every one of those countries were nothing less than revolutionary. The dissertation seeks to understand this recent development in the nature of revolutions by historically examining the phenomenon’s signal case, the Iranian Revolution. The core question asked is: what are the structural and historical forces that caused the Iranian Revolution to be the world’s first nonviolent revolution? The central argument is that both the emergence and success of the nonviolent Iranian Revolution can be explained by its internationalization. In other words, the Iranian Revolution turned out to be successfully nonviolent because, unlike previous revolutions, it was a global affair in which the revolutionaries intentionally and strategically sought to bring the world into their struggle against the state. Indirectly, the aim of this study is to generate the genesis of a theoretical framework that can explain more broadly the emergence and success of nonviolent revolutions in the late 1970s and beyond.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectNonviolenceen
dc.subjectRevolutionen
dc.subjectIranen
dc.subjectGlobalizationen
dc.subjectKhomeinien
dc.subjectCarteren
dc.subjectMuhammad Reza Shahen
dc.subjectMuhammad Reza Pahlavien
dc.subjectHuman rightsen
dc.subjectIron cage of liberalismen
dc.subjectPolitical sociologyen
dc.titleWhy the Iranian Revolution was nonviolent : internationalized social change and the iron cage of liberalismen
dc.date.updated2013-08-22T17:07:08Zen
dc.description.departmentSociologyen
thesis.degree.departmentSociologyen
thesis.degree.disciplineSociologyen
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Austinen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record