Show simple item record

dc.creatorFishkin, Josephen
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-27T14:05:44Zen
dc.date.available2013-03-27T14:05:44Zen
dc.date.issued2011-06en
dc.identifier.citationFishkin, J. (2011). Voting as a positive right: A reply to Flanders. Alaska Law Review, 28(1), 29-38. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss1/2en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/19777en
dc.descriptionChad Flanders' thoughtful article1 demonstrates that the Murkowski litigation raised questions with surprisingly fundamental implications for election law. This brief response addresses just one of the those questions. The question, which at first blush sounds awfully narrow and wonkish, is this: Can a state allow write-in votes, but discourage them by making them difficult to cast?2 I will argue that the answer is no - for reasons that highlight two fundamental, but underappreciated, aspects of election law.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherAlaska Law Reviewen
dc.subjectvotingen
dc.subjectFlanders, Chaden
dc.subjectFlandersen
dc.subjectwrite-in votesen
dc.subjectelection lawen
dc.subjectMurkowski litigationen
dc.titleVoting as a Positive Right: A Reply to Flandersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.departmentLawen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record