TexasScholarWorks
    • Login
    • Submit
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    • Repository Home
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The credibility consequences of managers' disclosure decisions

    View/Open
    Restricted to EID users (353.1Kb)
    Date
    2001-08
    Author
    Mercer, Maureen Ann
    Share
     Facebook
     Twitter
     LinkedIn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The purpose of this dissertation is two-fold. I first provide a model of the determinants of disclosure credibility. In my model, the four primary determinants of a disclosure’s credibility are situational incentives at the time of the disclosure, reactions of others, management’s credibility (i.e., management’s competence and trustworthiness), and characteristics of the disclosure itself. Developing a model of disclosure credibility is important, as anecdotal evidence indicates that managers are concerned about the credibility of their disclosures. Managers’ concerns are warranted; the academic literature suggests that firms who are able to credibly communicate information have a lower cost-of-capital. Given the importance of disclosure credibility to managers and the significant role that management credibility plays in disclosure credibility, the second part of my dissertation explores factors influencing management vii credibility. Specifically, I provide a theoretical framework and experimental evidence on how managers’ disclosure decisions affect their credibility with investors. Further, I examine whether investors’ judgements of management’s credibility are based on different factors in the short- and longer-term. My experimental results show that in the short-term, management disclosure decisions regarding negative news have larger effects on perceived management credibility than disclosure decisions regarding positive news. The results also show that these short-term credibility effects do not persist over time. That is, in the longer-term, perceived management credibility is primarily a function of the valence of the news disclosed. Managers of firms who report positive earnings news are rated as having higher credibility than managers of firms who report negative earnings news, regardless of their disclosure decisions. Implications of these results are discussed.
    Department
    Accounting
    Description
    text
    Subject
    Disclosure in accounting--United States
    Corporate profits--Forecasting
    Disclosure of information--United States
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/10748
    Collections
    • UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin

     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentsThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartments

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Information

    About Contact Policies Getting Started Glossary Help FAQs

    University of Texas at Austin Libraries
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • CONTACT US
    • MAPS & DIRECTIONS
    • JOB OPPORTUNITIES
    • UT Austin Home
    • Emergency Information
    • Site Policies
    • Web Accessibility Policy
    • Web Privacy Policy
    • Adobe Reader
    Subscribe to our NewsletterGive to the Libraries

    © The University of Texas at Austin