Browsing by Subject "relationships"
Now showing 1 - 17 of 17
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item A Conversation with Lawrence and Karen Kersten: Seeking Love Through Exchange(Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, 1982) Hogg Foundation for Mental HealthItem Differences in Children’s Friendships(2019-02-08) Comstock, HaleyItem Involvement with peers: comparisons between young children with and without Down’s syndrome(2019-09-19) Malkin, LindsayItem Is Your Partner Wrecking Your Financial Literacy?(2018-07-18) Kinonen, JudieItem Let's Talk About Sex Talk: How Gossip Helps Women Navigate the Risks of Hookup Culture(2023-05) Hung, Felicity“Let’s Talk About Sex Talk” explores the role of gossip in helping women navigate hookup culture. Hookup culture, characterized by casual sexual encounters with low commitment, comes with physical and emotional risks for women such as gender-based violence and emotional damage. Gossip between women can provide them with valuable information about potential partners, as well as learn about social norms and expectations within hookup culture. Using literature review, interviews, and participant observation, this study examines the ways in which gossip, through both online and offline formats, is used by women to bond, establish protective social networks, and evaluate sexual partners. The findings suggest that gossip can be a valuable tool for women to understand and combat the complex and often negative aspects of hookup culture, and that the content and context of gossip can reveal important insights into the disciplines of gender, sexuality, and social hierarchies. This thesis contributes to our understanding of how the interpersonal behavior and discourse of women allow them to protect themselves and others from systematic societal dangers in the context of sexual expression.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Curtis J. Hesse on 1943-08-09(1943-08-09) Hesse, Curtis J.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Fred P. Shayes on 1940-10-28(1940-10-28) Shayes, Fred P.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Harold W. Scott on 1950-11-08(1950-11-08) Scott, Harold W.Item Letter to Harry C. Davis from H.B. Stenzel on 1962-01-11(1962-01-11) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to Henryk B. Stenzel from F.Stearns MacNeil on 1957-05-14(1957-05-14) MacNeil, F.StearnsItem Letter to Joseph P. Breuer from H.B. Stenzel on 1964-01-21(1964-01-21) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to R.W. Menzel from H.B. Stenzel on 1967-08-25(1967-08-25) Stenzel, H.B.Item The LIBERATOR Archive, March 2016(University of Texas at Austin, 2016-03) University of Texas at AustinItem The Married Woman: Her Most Important Relationships(Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, 1968) Hogg Foundation for Mental Health; McDanald, Eugene C. Jr."No man is an island." And no person lives a life untouched by others. The married woman, especially, often serves as the pivot or focal point for many of her family's endeavors and goals. Her most important relationships, then, must be those involving herself, her husband, and her children. A good framework for discussion has been provided by the psychiatrist Dr. Karen Horney, who has stated that a person who is reasonably healthy from a mental and emotional standpoint is usually able to carry out three kinds of movement in her relationship to other persons and to herself. These are the ability to move with others, away from others, and against others in a friendly way. This booklet will deal with both the healthy and the neurotic woman and will demonstrate how each of them executes these three movements in action with herself and in relationship to her husband and to her child.Item Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-Type Stars from Kepler(2012-08) Howard, Andrew W.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Bryson, Stephen T.; Jenkins, Jon M.; Rowe, Jason F.; Batalha, Natalie M.; Borucki, William J.; Koch, David G.; Dunham, Edward W.; Gautier, Thomas N., III; Van Cleve, Jeffrey; Cochran, William D.; Latham, David W.; Lissauer, Jack J.; Torres, Guillermo; Brown, Timothy M.; Gilliland, Ronald L.; Buchhave, Lars A.; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jorgen; Ciardi, David; Fressin, Francois; Haas, Michael R.; Howell, Steve B.; Kjeldsen, Hans; Seager, Sara; Rogers, Leslie; Sasselov, Dimitar D.; Steffen, Jason H.; Basri, Gibor S.; Charbonneau, David; Christiansen, Jessie; Clarke, Bruce; Dupree, Andrea; Fabrycky, Daniel C.; Fischer, Debra A.; Ford, Eric B.; Fortney, Jonathan J.; Tarter, Jill; Girouard, Forrest R.; Holman, Matthew J.; Johnson, John Asher; Klaus, Todd C.; Machalek, Pavel; Moorhead, Althea V.; Morehead, Robert C.; Ragozzine, Darin; Tenenbaum, Peter; Twicken, Joseph D.; Quinn, Samuel N.; Isaacson, Howard; Shporer, Avi; Lucas, Philip W.; Walkowicz, Lucianne M.; Welsh, William F.; Boss, Alan; Devore, Edna; Gould, Alan; Smith, Jeffrey C.; Morris, Robert L.; Prsa, Andrej; Morton, Timothy D.; Still, Martin; Thompson, Susan E.; Mullally, Fergal; Endl, Michael; MacQueen, Phillip J.; Cochran, William D.; Endl, Michael; MacQueen, Phillip J.We report the distribution of planets as a function of planet radius, orbital period, and stellar effective temperature for orbital periods less than 50 days around solar-type (GK) stars. These results are based on the 1235 planets (formally "planet candidates") from the Kepler mission that include a nearly complete set of detected planets as small as 2 R-circle plus. For each of the 156,000 target stars, we assess the detectability of planets as a function of planet radius, R-p, and orbital period, P, using a measure of the detection efficiency for each star. We also correct for the geometric probability of transit, R-star/a. We consider first Kepler target stars within the "solar subset" having T-eff = 4100-6100 K, log g = 4.0-4.9, and Kepler magnitude Kp < 15 mag, i.e., bright, main-sequence GK stars. We include only those stars having photometric noise low enough to permit detection of planets down to 2 R-circle plus. We count planets in small domains of R-p and P and divide by the included target stars to calculate planet occurrence in each domain. The resulting occurrence of planets varies by more than three orders of magnitude in the radius-orbital period plane and increases substantially down to the smallest radius (2 R-circle plus) and out to the longest orbital period (50 days, similar to 0.25 AU) in our study. For P < 50 days, the distribution of planet radii is given by a power law, df/d log R = k(R)R(alpha) with k(R) = 2.9(-0.4)(+0.5), alpha = -1.92 +/- 0.11, and R equivalent to R-p/R-circle plus. This rapid increase in planet occurrence with decreasing planet size agrees with the prediction of core-accretion Formation but disagrees with population synthesis models that predict a desert at super-Earth and Neptune sizes for close-in orbits. Planets with orbital periods shorter than 2 days are extremely rare; for R-p > 2 R-circle plus we measure an occurrence of less than 0.001 planets per star. For all planets with orbital periods less than 50 days, we measure occurrence of 0.130 +/- 0.008, 0.023 +/- 0.003, and 0.013 +/- 0.002 planets per star for planets with radii 2-4, 4-8, and 8-32 R-circle plus, in agreement with Doppler surveys. We fit occurrence as a function of P to a power-law model with an exponential cutoff below a critical period P-0. For smaller planets, P-0 has larger values, suggesting that the "parking distance" for migrating planets moves outward with decreasing planet size. We also measured planet occurrence over a broader stellar T-eff range of 3600-7100 K, spanning M0 to F2 dwarfs. Over this range, the occurrence of 2-4 R-circle plus planets in the Kepler field increases with decreasing T-eff, with these small planets being seven times more abundant around cool stars (3600-4100 K) than the hottest stars in our sample (6600-7100 K).Item