Browsing by Subject "Petroleum -- Geology -- Texas -- Texas Panhandle"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Lower Permian facies of the Palo Duro Basin, Texas : depositional systems, shelf-margin evolution, paleogeography, and petroleum potential(University of Texas at Austin. Bureau of Economic Geology, 1980) Handford, C. RobertsonLower Permian (Wolfcampian) strata of the Palo Duro Basin consist of thick, terrigenous clastic and carbonate facies that were deposited in (1) fan-delta, (2) high-constructive delta, (3) carbonate shelf and shelf-margin, and (4) slope and basinal systems. Through Early Permian time, terrigenous detritus was eroded from surrounding highlands and transported by fluvial processes into the Palo Duro Basin. On the Amarillo Uplift and Bravo Dome, exposures of Precambrian basement yielded large quantities of arkosic sand and gravel (granite wash) that were deposited in progradational fan-delta systems. Concomitantly, high-constructive deltas transported subarkosic sand and mud into the southeastern Palo Duro Basin from the Wichita Uplift, or the Ouachita tectonic belt in Texas, or from both areas. During earliest Wolfcampian time, high-constructive deltas prograded westward beyond the shelf margin into deep, open marine water. As a result, thick (200 ft) delta-front sands were deposited. By middle Wolfcampian time, the supply of terrigenous sediment was reduced and shelf margins had prograded far into the basin. Deltas were restricted to the shallow shelf behind the shelf margin where thin (50 ft) delta-front sands accumulated. A carbonate bank and shelf-margin complex, probably composed of calcareous algae, foraminifers, and sponges, was present seaward of delta systems and faced southward into the Midland Basin. Thicknesses of stratigraphic sequences indicate that shelf-margin complexes probably stood approximately 200 to 400 ft (60 to 120 m) above the basin floor. Basinward termination of shelf-margin strata is sharp in many places, giving rise to thick basinal and slope shales and dark-colored micritic limestones. Lenticular, basinward-thickening accumulations of shale occur along shelf margins in slope or submarine fan-head feeder channels that served as major pathways for clastic input to the deep basin. Feeder channels occur near seaward limits of delta lobes, which suggests that most deepwater sediment was derived from delta systems. Interplay between delta-lobe advances and episodes of carbonate bank development provided a mechanism for shelf-margin progradation. As deltas prograded across shallow-shelf environments into shelf-margin terrain, carbonate productivity was reduced, and large quantities of fine-grained deltaic sediment were carried into the basin by feeder channels. As a result of increased terrigenous sedimentation, thick sediment wedges, or submarine fans, were built across the slope and the basin. Eventually, delta lobes were abandoned, clear-water conditions returned, and carbonate productivity increased. Coalescing carbonate banks accreted basinward over slope wedges and formed a new shelf margin seaward of the previous shelf margin. In contrast to highly progradational shelf margins in eastern Palo Duro Basin, western shelf margins are mainly aggradational. No major delta systems were present to furnish large quantities of sediment needed for development of thick slope wedges. Consequently, western shelf margins were not able to prograde significantly. Repeated cycles of slope-fan sedimentation followed by carbonate shelf-margin progradation quickly filled the Palo Duro Basin. By the end of Wolfcampian time the basin was transformed from a relatively deep basin into a wide, peritidal shelf environment. Potential hydrocarbon reservoirs occur in shelf-margin carbonates, delta-front sandstones, and fan-delta arkoses. Zones of porous (greater than 10 percent) dolomite are concentrated near shelf margins and have configurations similar to productive Lower Permian shelf-margin trends in New Mexico. Delta-front sandstones (log-computed porosity of 18 to 25 percent) are similar to producing deltaic sandstones of Morris Buie-Blaco Fields in North-Central Texas. Porous (18 percent) fan-delta sandstones along the south flank of the Amarillo Uplift may form reservoirs similar to that of the Mobeetie Field on the north side of the Amarillo Uplift in Wheeler County, Texas. Potential hydrocarbon source beds occur in slope and basinal environments. Total organic carbon generally ranges from 1 to 2.3 percent by weight and averages 0.589 percent by weight.Item Stratigraphy and petroleum potential of pre-Pennsylvanian rocks : Palo Duro Basin, Texas Panhandle(University of Texas at Austin. Bureau of Economic Geology, 1985) Ruppel, Stephen C.Pre-Pennsylvanian rocks in the Palo Duro Basin include (1) basal transgressive marine Cambrian(?) sandstones deposited over Precambrian basement, (2) overlying Lower Ordovician dolomites of the Ellenburger Group that formed when shallow seas covered much of the North American continent, and(3) Mississippian limestones and dolomites deposited when the area was inundated again after middle Paleozoic uplift and erosion. A generally similar stratigraphic sequence exists in the adjacent Dalhart and Hardeman Basins. Mississippian deposits, the most widespread and best known pre-Pennsylvanian rocks, exhibit considerable facies and paleoenvironmental diversity throughout the Texas Panhandle. The lowermost Mississippian "Osage" contains cherty and shaly dolomites and limestones. In the eastern Palo Duro Basin and in the Hardeman Basin further to the east, these rocks are interbedded carbonate mudstones and limestone turbidites that were deposited below wave base in relatively deep, quiet water. Westward, the "Osage" includes progressively shallower water facies."Meramec" limestones are remarkably similar throughout the Texas Panhandle. These coarse-grained, light-colored, skeletal (bryozoan/echinoderm) grainstones record the establishment during the middle to late Meramecian of a widespread, shallow-water, carbonate sand shoal. However, before this shoal developed in the Hardeman Basin, numerous local carbonate buildups formed (Chappel Formation).The uppermost Mississippian "Chester" contains interbedded ooid grainstones and shales that attest to (1) the maintenance of shallow-water marine conditions and (2) the development of terrigenous clastic source areas associated with early phases of Late Carboniferous tectonic activity. Uppermost "Chester" shales (Barnett Formation) and limestones (Comyn Formation) in the Hardeman Basin to the east are not present in the Palo Duro Basin owing to facies change or erosion or both.All pre-Pennsylvanian units contain sufficient porosity and permeability, at least locally, to be hydrocarbon reservoirs. Potential structural and stratigraphic traps are plentiful throughout the area. Carbonate buildups are productive in the nearby Hardeman Basin; similar buildups may exist in at least the eastern part of the Palo Duro Basin. However, suitable top seals may be lacking in the Palo Duro Basin.Although the quality of organic matter contained in the pre-Pennsylvanian deposits in the Palo Duro Basin is good, there is probably too little organic carbon for these rocks to be hydrocarbon sources. The "Osage" of the eastern Palo Duro Basin contains the highest amounts of organic matter. The Barnett Formation, which contains organic- matter-rich shales in the Hardeman Basin to the east, does not extend into the Palo Duro Basin.Calculations of thermal maturity based on vitrinite reflectance indicate that although pre-Pennsylvanian rocks in the Palo Duro Basin are substantially less mature than those in the Hardeman Basin, most have attained at least the minimum degree of heating necessary to produce hydrocarbons. Thermal maturity in the area generally correlates with the present-day geothermal gradient, which increases toward the east.Petroleum potential of the pre-Pennsylvanian rocks of the Palo Duro Basin is relatively low. Future exploration in these rocks should concentrate on areas where source rock quality, maturity, and reservoir conditions are optimum. The extreme southern and eastern parts of the basin appear to offer the greatest promise.