Browsing by Subject "Coastal Plain"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 50
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Catahoula Formation of the Texas Coastal Plain: Origin, Geochemical Evolution, and Characterisitics of Uranium Deposits(1979) Galloway, William E.; Kaiser, W. R.Uranium was released from volcanic glass deposited within the Catahoula through early pedogenic and diagenetic processes. Pedogenesis was the most efficient process for mobilizing uranium. Original uranium content in fresh Catahoula glass is estimated to have averaged at least 10 ppM; about 5 ppM was mobilized after deposition and made available for migration. Uranium was transported predominantly as uranyl dicarbonate ion. Chlorinity mapping reveals modern ground-water flow patterns. Six utranium deposits representative of the ores were studied. Uranium-bearing meteoric waters were reduced by pre-ore stage pyrite formed by extrinsically introduced fault-leaked sulfide or intrinsically by organic matter. Uranium was concentrated in part by adsorption on Ca-montmorillonite cutans, amorphous TiO/sub 2/, and/or organic matter followed by uranyl reduction to U/sup 4 +/ in amorphous uranous silicates. Clinoptilolite is not correlative with mineralization. Calcite is pervasive throughout host sands but shows no relationship to uranium mineralization. Presence of marcasite and uranium together at the alteration front strongly supports an acid pH during Catahoula mineralization. Maximum adsorption and minimum solubility of uranium occur at pH 6 in carbonate-rich waters. Log activity ratios of individual waters supersaturated with respect to montmorillonite, taken from montmorillonite-clinoptilolite activity diagrams, show positive correlation with uranium mineralization. High Ca/sup 2 +/, Mg/sup 2 +/, Al(OH)/sub 4//sup -/, and H/sup +/ activities promote the formation of montmorillonite relative to clinoptilolite. High saturation ratios for montmorillonite show fair correlation with mineralization. The mineral-solution equilibria approach is a potential method of geochemical exploration. 56 figures, 8 tables.Item Letter to A.S. Romer from H.B. Stenzel on 1946-09-08(1946-09-08) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to B.W. Blanpied from H.B. Stenzel on 1940-09-27(1940-09-27) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to David Nicol from H.B. Stenzel on 1968-07-09(1968-07-09) Stenzel, H.B.Item Letter to Don R. Anderson from H.B. Stenzel on 1969-09-10(1969-09-10) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to E.Milby Burton from H.B. Stenzel on 1940-12-09(1940-12-09) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to E.N. Goddard from H.B. Stenzel on 1958-01-17(1958-01-17) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to Franklyn B. Van Houten from H.B. Stenzel on 1953-01-29(1953-01-29) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to Gayle Scott from H.B. Stenzel on 1943-01-16(1943-01-16) Stenzel, Henryk B.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from E.Milby Burton on 1940-12-19(1940-12-19) Burton, E.MilbyItem Letter to H.B. Stenzel from E.N. Goddard on 1958-01-22(1958-01-22) Goddard, E.N.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Ernest E. Russell on 1963-11-20(1963-11-20) Russell, Ernest E.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from F.E. Turner on 1945-07-30(1945-07-30) Turner, F.E.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Frederic F. Mellen on 1941-05-11(1941-05-11) Mellen, Frederic F.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Harry S. Ladd on 1967-02-07(1967-02-07) Ladd, Harry S.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from J.E. Elliott on 1957-04-02(1957-04-02) Elliott, J.E.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from James E. Allen on 1968-10-21(1968-10-21) Allen, James E.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from John Emery Adams on 1946-09-08(1946-09-08) Adams, John EmeryItem Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Le Brun N. Smith on 1960-07-13(1960-07-13) Smith, Le Brun N.Item Letter to H.B. Stenzel from Lloyd W. Stephenson on 1944-03-16(1944-03-16) Stephenson, Lloyd W.
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »