=-' 
'
·.'' . " ' 
, 	.. 
\ 
, I:· 
1 ..  ,. ;  I '· r ' ' ' '  :I  "' ,, ..  ~~g:c­. j' .DEPARTMENT OF STATE I CZECH TASK FORCB:·' .  •  


i " l, ~i.gns·. P.t.~Cze..e:.ho~ l.~':'~k £0.!1£.e~·~...0~.!1 I~.<:_r_e!l.s.e: Evidence is incl:'ea~ing • I that the Czachos~ovaks are knuckli.ng under ·to. Soviet demand a·. Two indi­
' I 
"
I,. 	cations of ~ Qan on independ~nt political activity have appeared. First, the .Interior Ministry refused to legalize tl1e existence of two quas1­poli.tical . clubs-""t.he .11 231 Club," (composed o~ former victims of political persecution)' and thei. "Club ·of Commi.tted Non-Party People. · (FBIS 72) Second the. Presidium of 'the .Conl:ral Conuuit.tee of the National Fron.t issued a state.' 
. I 	ment claiming that there. is no reason for political activities outside the Front. (FBlS (>3) On the quest.ion of censc>rship, the Slovak Central Commit• tee on September 5 said th~ conclusions of '. the Moscow meeting on the press, redio• and te,lcvision were -"an unavoidable.step.to normalize relations 
· bet.ween social·ist states"· and a·nnounced its determin.ation to reali.ze them 
·as a temporary measu1:e, "with ,all thoroughn~ss.·" (FBIS 6) National Assembly .President1Smrkovs~y t.old an 1.nLerviewer·.th&t the Assembly would discuss · ·draft laws .on tho Hat.1onal Fi:ont, on the press 1 and on as.scmbly and associa• 
~ion (FBIS 57); it ae~ma inescapable that all three law• will be repressive
. \ 
in n<\ t.1.' re• 	I . 
This spirit of increasing cooper~tivencss with the occupiers was also refle.cted in the. speech to the Slovak party pl.en.um by the. liberal Gustav Hosakt newly elected Slovak party ·Chief. Hµsa.k attacked those who re­jected the Moscow Etgreement 1 as well as tho~e who wanted to i 4 et:ul."n to the Novotny epl; he asserted that "no for~i.gn ~rgans in our c<mntry are cal'ry­
·1ng <'Ut ai.·rests or U\eddling in sec.uri.ty problems;" he urged Slovak media I to accopt press restrictions voluntarily and threatened "harsh measures" L for non-compliance; and he admitted that the Dubcek regime had been guilty I I of 0 inconsistencies'' .in policy and of a ''l~ck of full appreciati.on of inter• 
national factors." (FBIS 10•14) 
2. .S.19.VJtks A,PP:.rove Sta.teho.q,c!,: Th~ Slovak ;party plen.\.tm recommended the 
. acceptance by October 28 of a proposal to ~stablish a federation embodying --as one Slovak leader put ~t-·"the statehood of the independent Slovak nation as a free pllrtner of the equal Cz~ch nation in a ·federal socialist 
.· 	Czechoslovakia." .Slovaks at the plenum showed sensitivity to charges that thC!y woro taking ·advan~age' of the Cze~hs · a~ a ti.me. of weakness. (FBIS 4; 6) 
3. Pravda Dissatisfj~c.ct,,_wi_~h. :~_Q...I'Jll~lizatio~" Pace: A Scptembe.r 6 Pravdf\ srti.c1e took note of some i"normalization" pt·ogi·ess but concerned it;eAlf! chi('!ly wf.th continuing dc·fi~ic~c'ies in this process. lt claimed that ¢hanges in Czech political and publi.c life :are only in the initifll stage 
· ·and that "co-.\,~dorab'l~ efforts" would have ·to be exetted to "liquidate the 
I : · ·· f 	.... . . 
' 	DECLASSIFIED 
I 
!. 

•
E.0. 12356, Sec. 3.4 .;·-, 
.~LJ 7t> ~/6~.. ?: 
. 
' . 'I 
I 	H~·7NARA~ :Dat .C,0,-~.-?0 
• I ' I 
... 
.... 

1 • 
' 
' 
I' 

§.it~JJ..on Re,£oyt 0800_1lour{! E,.DT,,,, Septcru.be,r 6, 1968 
heavy losses inflicted by the actio1\R of the ant:i..soci.alist forces." Among the activities of those for~es, th~ ·article· listed terrorism subversion slandering· of the Moscow talks, attempts ' to d1.scredit the Cz~ch leadership, and intimidation of those. responding to the; appeal.a of the Czech party and . • government • . It also claimed th~t the r1ght~wingers are trying to spread the noti.on that "normalization" means merely the withdrawal of Warsaw Fact 
.
. 	troops. (FBIS 27) An Izv.£.sti 1!. ai.•ticle S~ptcmber 5 struck.some of the 
·same notes, but· put.. more accent on posi.tive moves toward normali.zation, 
(FBIS 1) 

'· 
."r 	4. poviets AttRc)< Yugos.lP-vi.a: In the sharpest language used against Yugoslavia in yell rs·, t.~e Soviet pi.·ess (in .fuld Star) brAnded the Yugoslavs . " as "revisi.onists whose anti-Soviet 'theses' . are readily used by imperialist propaga1tda." Red Star. lumped thei. Yugoslav "~evisi.oniats" with the Chinese "spl ittet's" as abettors. of i.mperiAlisro, bu·t ". it significantly omitted the Romanians from .its atta.cl<. (1''BIS 31) .BefC1:i.-e the fil~l Star article appeared, a leading Y"'gosl.av politician, $erbian party chief l'etar Stambolic, referred 
. publicly to orgap°tzed and deliberate _attacks on Yugoslavia comi.ng from the socialist countries engaged in the occupa'tion of C~echoslovt\kia; St~nnbolic also emphasized. th~ necessity of defending rugoslavia 0 £r011\ possible attacks, froln whatever side they may come." (FBIS 75) 
There is still no hard evidence of a So~iet and/or allied milit~ry build­up against either Yugoslavia or Romania. 
5. J:.on>)O. EKri1:csses R~s.ery!Jj._~s on t...'o;rld _Cppmuni~t J1~eti,n.s,: ltalian Com­munist leader Longo told a journal ''it is .not uscful ••• to hold the world communist confer.ence ".scheduled for Moscow ·next November "until the sitoa'.'9 ·tion in Ci;echoslovakia is satisf~ctori.ly normalized •., , .Only a return to normal can now av£n't still tnoi·c serious splits in the int()rnational com­
munist movement.•• (AFl~, Ron:u) • . FBIS 73) 
,/I
I ' 
I . 	I' 

I . 


• 
I 
I.. 
I • 
... 1 

! . 	I
' 
..;; 
1-. 
.·