• ... ·1'....---.. . ..... · #./; • uJ rcJ CONTRQ:, : 77!+2Q Action I P? D·1'7 ·c I\ u ..... RECE lVEO : r~OV 2 S, DE RUrUH~1• 802 333 t 300 8 . , 0 ~ D' .J(J ""J.. . ~. ~~NY SSSSS 11 fo P 291200Z NOV $7 DECLASSIFIED -M AMEMBASSY B CHAREST E.O. 12958, Sec. 3.5 70 SECSTATE WASHbC 786 PRIORITi State Dept. Guidel · T\CS s-ATE GR. C . By_,...__,NARA, Date ., f..-o f BT ~T BUCHARES-802 ODIS GOVTO 32 SUBuEC':~ D:scuss:o \V H ·cEAUSESCU NOV 28 •• CEAUSESCU ~ECEIVED ME _NOV 28 AT 1730 FOR TWO HOURS. AL~os: E~T:RE :scuSSi01 CENTERED ON VIETNAM THOUGH TOWARD END CEA SESCU RA.SEO S B ECT OUR POLICY TOWARD CHINA . 2. AF:ER EXPRESSING APPRECIA-ION FOR ~OPPORTUNITY .O CALL 01 1 HIM, I MEt1TI01 ED THE w.~RM IMPRESSION WHICH PR! ·~~ ··nN MAURER HAD l(,riDE 01 PRESIDENT JOH SON AND SEGRE ARY RUSK A1 ' D THE PAGE 2 RUFUh ~ 802 .. ~ E R E I -.... I 1POR A1 CE WITH WHICH WE VIEWED OUR RELATIONS \'JITH ROMAt IA •. I THE SAID I HAD COME TO TALK WITH THE PRIMEMI TO DISCUSS \HAT MIGh BE DO 1E TO BRI G THE VIET 1AM PROB E.·i ""O A ?.:..t;;<..:.~·-L­ SOLU ... 10~'. o , 1ED o u r t9 5 4 sE A T o c o r·i Mi : ME n... c u R Pur~ ? r-i sE '£' o -, .:; · · ;-z sou-H V... E. ,1H"1ESE PEOPLE hMD RIGhT 10 DEC ID~ o -• "· ,-,. L..\: 1-V •\('J. I (, .... lJ• •• ~f.) 1 1 A.'\ I ft1 () /l-. t. "1• f I A 'D VIET, AM TOGETHER. CEAUSEScu·s CPTNIO~~ P1;~y ;:;UCii f11 T 1"~·•• 'l .. v.J WOULD 10T LEAD. -o VERY "SiPSCTf\ "'ULAi<'. l\ESUL 'S UN-IL CESSATI01' ' . PAGE 3 RCFUHT 802 ~ OF RO.. ffilNG, WHILE CEAUSESCU AGREED THAT REUNlFlCATlON OF DlVlDED COU1 1TR IES SHOULD OT BE ACHIEVED THROUGH FORCE, 1.:. BL~.-..;J~Y ARGU:D HAT' NLF HAD PUT FORTH PROGRA M FOR REUNIFICATION ONLY AS L0, 1G-TIME AND PEACEFUL DEVELOPMENT WITH WHICH DRV AGREED. HE ASSE~TED -HMT DRV COULD NOT WAGE WA~ IN SOUTH WHICH DTD N07 HAVE SUPPORT OF PEOPLE THERE AND SUGGESTED US POLICY BASED 0~ 1 INCOrYi?LETE -. FORMAT:ON A.'D INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS. TO MY REPEATED QUES7IO. S WHY HA, OI HA) SLAMMED DOOR I FACE PRESIDENT'S GE1 1EROUS SAN AN-0, IO OF~ER A. D WH' HnNOI REFUSED TO SAY EITHER PUBLICLY OR PRIVA-ELY \HAT WOU .... D HAPPEN AFT ER PERM1~ l1ENT CES SAT I 0 N OF BOMB L 1G CE AUS ES CU T 0 0 K L I ~E vJ E WE RE I MP 0S I NG C 0 ND I T I 0 NS ; TH AT A 8 0 /8 I G PAUSE WOULD BE .01 1LY ANOTHER FORM QF.·ULTIMATUM; THAT ABSENCE . OF FORMAL DECLARA-IO.J OF WAR RAISED PROBLEMS IN I TERNATiONAL LA J (I.E., BOMBING) 1~0T I~ FAVOROF US AND THAT IF US WOULD 01 .... Y CEASE B0~1BING PERMANENTLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY OTHER COUNTRIES WOULD EXERCISC PRESSURE ON BOTH SIDES TO BRING THEM TO NEGOTIATING ABLE.CEAUSESCU ALSO ARGUED THAT CESSATION BOMBING WOULD BE ACT Or POLITICAL WISDOM. 6. CEAUSESCU RAISkD QUESTION WHY US ADOPTED POLICY OF OBSTRUCTION TO CHI. A'S ASSUMPT ON RIGHTFUL PLACE IN LN. EXPRESSED OPINION PAGE 4 RUF UH T 80 2 ~E 6 ft E 'f THAT 1JH ILE us COULD OT I 0 J VOTE IN FAVOR CH I ' ESE ENTRY' I IT COULD STEP "A LIT-LE ASIDE" AND NOT O~POSE IT. HE THOUGH~ TH IS COULD BE GOOD GESTURE AND ADVISED, "Lr.T THI GS EVOLVE BY THEl';S .:.LVES . GE, ERAL RELATIONS BET\JEE CHINA AND ALL COUNTRIES ,JOULD IMPROV~ " REFERRED TO buR rREQUENT TALKS WITH CHI ESE AND 7HEIR REFUS ~ TO CO, SIDER ANY STEPS EVEN I, THE FIELD OF EXCHANGES OR TRAD.:. UNTIL THE US HA~ DED OVER FORMOSA -o THEM ... HIS ~1E \~ERL: NOT ? t;PA., .... '.) TO DO; IT IS A MATTER FOR THE FORMOSA1 PEOPLE 70· DECIDE. , -·--.. • -3 -BUCHAREST 802 Nov 29 7. DESPITE THE .VIGOROUS ARGU~~7NTS r f' f ESc..N 2D ON v·t.T~1AM ALO~~ . LINES TAKEN E1,RLIE:R \·JITH 111un·~n, C.t:AUSEscu 1 EMAINED ~HRou.... Hou· OBDURATE. NEVERT°HELESS DISCUSSION, THOUGH ARGUMEN7ATIVE AT -r~,E:S, • '" OCEEDED IN NOT ·UNFRIENDLY ATMOSPHERE AND AT THE DOOR AS I WAS LEAVING CEAUSESCU MADE PARTICULAR POINT AS HE HAD DONE O, CE OR TWICE EARLIER OF ROMANIA•S DESIRE TO BE HELPFUL IN SOLV~~!G PROBLAMS PEAC~FULLY AND IN . PARTICULAR TO DEVELOP AND IMPROVE GOG RELATIONS WITH THE US . ·· · Plf ?' 1;, . .