Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations

Repository

Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations

Show full record

Title: Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations
Author: Elkins, Zachary
Abstract: A group of influential scholars has argued emphatically that democracy should be measured dichotomously. This position challenges--on both theoretical and methodological grounds--the widespread practice of measuring democracy with graded scales, a practice which has been endorsed by leading methodologists who study democracy. This article proposes several empirical tests that evaluate the competing strategies. The evidence suggests that, on the whole, graded measures have superior validity and reliability. Hence, we should understand that specific cases correspond to the concept of democracy to varying degrees--degrees that can and should be measured.
Department: Government
Subject: Methodology Political Science Dichotomous Democracy Gradation Continuous Gradations of Democracy Variables Quantitative
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/15335
Date: 2000-04

Files in this work

Description: "Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations." 2000. American Journal of Political Science 44: 293-300.
Size: 1.011Mb
Format: application/pdf
Description: "Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations." Appendix 1
Size: 30.20Kb
Format: application/msword
Description: "Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations." Data
Download File: elkins_AJPS2000_data.dta
Size: 762.5Kb
Format: application/octet-stream
Description: "Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations." Documentation
Size: 25.08Kb
Format: application/msword

This work appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full record


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Information